Beth A Cloud1, Kristin D Zhao2, Arin M Ellingson3, Ahmad Nassr3, Anthony J Windebank4, Kai-Nan An3. 1. Mayo Graduate School, Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 2. Rehabilitation Medicine Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Electronic address: zhao.kristin@mayo.edu. 3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 4. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To quantify and compare spinal curvature and shoulder kinematics throughout the manual wheelchair (MWC) propulsion cycle for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) who were seated at 2 different seat dump angles. DESIGN: Single-group, repeated-measures study. SETTING: Academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N=28) with SCI or spinal cord disease who used MWCs completed a telephone screening, and 21 of them were eligible and completed the study. INTERVENTIONS: Participants' personal MWCs were modified to have seat dump angles of 0° or 14°, with a vertical backrest. Participants completed at least 3 propulsion cycles in each condition, during which spine and shoulder motion data were collected with fiberoptic and electromagnetic sensors, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thoracolumbar spinal curvature, glenohumeral kinematics, and scapulothoracic kinematics at the start of push (SP), mid-push (MP), end of push (EP), and mid-recovery. RESULTS: Participants had significantly less lordosis in the 14° condition for all propulsion events. Median differences ranged from 2.0° to 4.6°. Lordosis differences were more pronounced in those with low SCI. Scapulothoracic internal rotation was increased in the 14° condition at SP and MP (mean differences, 2.5° and 2.7°, respectively). Relative downward rotation increased in the 14° condition at SP and MP (mean differences, 2.4° and 2.1°, respectively). Scapulothoracic differences were more pronounced in those with high SCI. No glenohumeral rotations were significantly different between the conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Scapulothoracic kinematics and spinal curvature differences during propulsion may be associated with the position of other body segments or postural stability. Because no differences were observed at the glenohumeral joint, the risk of subacromial impingement may not be affected by this seat angle change.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify and compare spinal curvature and shoulder kinematics throughout the manual wheelchair (MWC) propulsion cycle for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) who were seated at 2 different seat dump angles. DESIGN: Single-group, repeated-measures study. SETTING: Academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N=28) with SCI or spinal cord disease who used MWCs completed a telephone screening, and 21 of them were eligible and completed the study. INTERVENTIONS:Participants' personal MWCs were modified to have seat dump angles of 0° or 14°, with a vertical backrest. Participants completed at least 3 propulsion cycles in each condition, during which spine and shoulder motion data were collected with fiberoptic and electromagnetic sensors, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thoracolumbar spinal curvature, glenohumeral kinematics, and scapulothoracic kinematics at the start of push (SP), mid-push (MP), end of push (EP), and mid-recovery. RESULTS:Participants had significantly less lordosis in the 14° condition for all propulsion events. Median differences ranged from 2.0° to 4.6°. Lordosis differences were more pronounced in those with low SCI. Scapulothoracic internal rotation was increased in the 14° condition at SP and MP (mean differences, 2.5° and 2.7°, respectively). Relative downward rotation increased in the 14° condition at SP and MP (mean differences, 2.4° and 2.1°, respectively). Scapulothoracic differences were more pronounced in those with high SCI. No glenohumeral rotations were significantly different between the conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Scapulothoracic kinematics and spinal curvature differences during propulsion may be associated with the position of other body segments or postural stability. Because no differences were observed at the glenohumeral joint, the risk of subacromial impingement may not be affected by this seat angle change.
Authors: Lucas H V van der Woude; Arianne Bouw; Joeri van Wegen; Harry van As; Dirkjan Veeger; Sonja de Groot Journal: J Rehabil Med Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 2.912
Authors: Melissa M B Morrow; Meegan G Van Straaten; Naveen S Murthy; Jonathan P Braman; Elia Zanella; Kristin D Zhao Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-08-11 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Joseph D Mozingo; Mohsen Akbari-Shandiz; Meegan G Van Straaten; Naveen S Murthy; Beth A Schueler; David R Holmes; Cynthia H McCollough; Kristin D Zhao Journal: J Electromyogr Kinesiol Date: 2019-08-23 Impact factor: 2.368
Authors: Megan Gill; Margaux Linde; Kalli Fautsch; Rena Hale; Cesar Lopez; Daniel Veith; Jonathan Calvert; Lisa Beck; Kristin Garlanger; Reggie Edgerton; Dimitry Sayenko; Igor Lavrov; Andrew Thoreson; Peter Grahn; Kristin Zhao Journal: Front Syst Neurosci Date: 2020-11-19