Literature DB >> 22480478

Role of endothelial shear stress in stent restenosis and thrombosis: pathophysiologic mechanisms and implications for clinical translation.

Konstantinos C Koskinas1, Yiannis S Chatzizisis, Antonios P Antoniadis, George D Giannoglou.   

Abstract

Restenosis and thrombosis are potentially fatal complications of coronary stenting with a recognized multifactorial etiology. The effect of documented risk factors, however, cannot explain the preponderance of certain lesion types, stent designs, and implantation configurations for the development of these complications. Local hemodynamic factors, low endothelial shear stress (ESS) in particular, are long known to critically affect the natural history of atherosclerosis. Increasing evidence now suggests that ESS may also contribute to the development of restenosis and thrombosis upon stenting of atherosclerotic plaques, in conjunction with well-appreciated risk factors. In this review, we present in vivo and mechanistic evidence associating ESS with the localization and progression of neointimal hyperplasia and in-stent clotting. Clinical studies have associated stent design features with the risk of restenosis. Importantly, computational simulations extend these observations by directly linking specific stent geometry and positioning characteristics with the post-stenting hemodynamic milieu and with the stent's thrombogenicity and pro-restenotic potential, thereby indicating ways to clinical translation. An enhanced understanding of the pathophysiologic role of ESS in restenosis and thrombosis might dictate hemodynamically favorable stent designs and deployment configurations to reduce the potential for late lumen loss and thrombotic obstruction. Recent methodologies for in vivo ESS profiling at a clinical level might allow for early identification of patients at high risk for the development of restenosis or thrombosis and might thereby guide individualized, risk-tailored treatment strategies to prevent devastating complications of endovascular interventions.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22480478     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  59 in total

1.  Impact of bifurcation dual stenting on endothelial shear stress.

Authors:  Henry Y Chen; Bon-Kwon Koo; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2015-07-16

2.  Two-year longitudinal evaluation of a second-generation thin-strut sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold with hybrid cell design in porcine coronary arteries.

Authors:  Pawel Gasior; Yanping Cheng; Jinggang Xia; Gerard B Conditt; Jennifer C McGregor; Renu Virmani; Juan F Granada; Grzegorz L Kaluza
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.737

3.  Impact of stent implantation on endothelial shear stress.

Authors:  F Economou; S Katranas; G Giannoglou; K Gemitzis; I Styliadis; G Efthimiadis; H Karvounis; A Ziakas
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Computer methods for follow-up study of hemodynamic and disease progression in the stented coronary artery by fusing IVUS and X-ray angiography.

Authors:  Arso M Vukicevic; Nemanja M Stepanovic; Gordana R Jovicic; Svetlana R Apostolovic; Nenad D Filipovic
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Coronary stent thrombosis: what have we learned?

Authors:  Carlos Collet; Yohei Sotomi; Rafael Cavalcante; Pannipa Suwannasom; Erhan Tenekecioglu; Yoshinobu Onuma; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  MicroRNA mediation of endothelial inflammatory response to smooth muscle cells and its inhibition by atheroprotective shear stress.

Authors:  Li-Jing Chen; Li Chuang; Yi-Hsuan Huang; Jing Zhou; Seh Hong Lim; Chih-I Lee; Wei-Wen Lin; Ting-Er Lin; Wei-Li Wang; Linyi Chen; Shu Chien; Jeng-Jiann Chiu
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 7.  Mechanisms of drug-eluting stent restenosis.

Authors:  Jiro Aoki; Kengo Tanabe
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2020-11-21

Review 8.  Efficacy and safety of cilostazol based triple antiplatelet treatment versus dual antiplatelet treatment in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation: an updated meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jun Chen; Haoyu Meng; Lei Xu; Jie Liu; Deyu Kong; Pengsheng Chen; Xiaoxuan Gong; Jianling Bai; Fengwei Zou; Zhijian Yang; Chunjian Li; John W Eikelboom
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Walking the right path: the story of bioresorbable stents.

Authors:  Stephen Ellis
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Rheolytic effects of left main mid-shaft/distal stenting: a computational flow dynamic analysis.

Authors:  Gianluca Rigatelli; Marco Zuin; Fabio Dell'Avvocata; Thach Nguyen
Journal:  Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2018-03-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.