Literature DB >> 22480224

Recency of Pap testing and future testing plans among women aged 18-64: analysis of the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey.

Mahima Ashok1, Zahava Berkowitz, Nikki A Hawkins, Florence Tangka, Mona Saraiya.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer incidence has declined as a result of Papanicolaou (Pap) test use. Current guidelines recommend increasing screening intervals for women of average risk. The objective of this study is to examine current screening intervals, factors associated with recency of Pap testing, and future testing plans.
METHODS: We analyzed data from 2915 female respondents, aged 18-64, using the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS), a biennial national survey of access and use of cancer information in the United States. We divided time since last Pap test into ≤1 year (n=1960), >1 to ≤3 years (n=512), >3 years/never had Pap test (n=443). We performed univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression, using proportional odds model with cumulative logit link.
RESULTS: Sixty-five percent of women had their most recent Pap test within 1 year. Most expected to be screened again within 1 year (81%). This expectation was highest among women who were tested within the previous year (90.9%). Having had a test within 1 year was positively associated with age groups 31-45 vs. 46-64 years; with being non-Hispanic black vs. non-Hispanic white; with being a college graduate vs. having less education; with being married, divorced, or separated vs. widowed; with having at least one visit to a healthcare provider in the past year; and with being aware of the human papillomavirus (HPV).
CONCLUSIONS: Most women currently are tested and anticipate future testing at annual intervals. To implement guidelines, increased communication and systematic or policy changes may be needed to reduce overtesting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22480224     DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2012.3562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  10 in total

1.  Correlates of Cervical Cancer Screening Adherence Among Women in the U.S.: Findings from HINTS 2013-2014.

Authors:  John S Luque; Yelena N Tarasenko; Chen Chen
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2018-08

2.  Predictors of human papillomavirus awareness and knowledge in 2013: gaps and opportunities for targeted communication strategies.

Authors:  Kelly D Blake; Allison J Ottenbacher; Lila J Finney Rutten; Meredith A Grady; Sarah C Kobrin; Robert M Jacobson; Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Utilization of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Hispanic Immigrant Women in Coastal South Carolina.

Authors:  John S Luque; Yelena N Tarasenko; Hong Li; Caroline B Davila; Rachel N Knight; Rosa E Alcantar
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2017-07-12

4.  Adherence to the 2012 national cervical cancer screening guidelines: a pilot study.

Authors:  Deanna G K Teoh; Amity E Marriott; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Ryan T Marriott; Charles W Lais; Levi S Downs; Shalini L Kulasingam
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Cervical cancer screening among young adult women in the United States.

Authors:  Katherine B Roland; Vicki B Benard; Ashwini Soman; Nancy Breen; Deanna Kepka; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Intervention to improve follow-up for abnormal Papanicolaou tests: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Lauren Dawson; James J Grady; Daniel M Breitkopf; Carolyn Nelson-Becker; Russell R Snyder
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  A population-based evaluation of cervical screening in the United States: 2008-2011.

Authors:  Jack Cuzick; Orrin Myers; William C Hunt; Michael Robertson; Nancy E Joste; Philip E Castle; Vicki B Benard; Cosette M Wheeler
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  The utility of Google Trends data to examine interest in cancer screening.

Authors:  M Schootman; A Toor; P Cavazos-Rehg; D B Jeffe; A McQueen; J Eberth; N O Davidson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  The Possible Effects on Socio-Economic Inequalities of Introducing HPV Testing as Primary Test in Cervical Cancer Screening Programs.

Authors:  Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Flavia Baldacchini; Guglielmo Ronco
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Cervical cancer and screening: knowledge, awareness and attitudes of women in Malta.

Authors:  Michelle Deguara; Neville Calleja; Kathleen England
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2021-01-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.