OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a theory-based, culturally targeted intervention on adherence to follow-up among low-income and minority women who experience an abnormal Pap test. METHOD: 5,049 women were enrolled and underwent Pap testing. Of these, 378 had an abnormal result and 341 (90%) were randomized to one of three groups to receive their results: Intervention (I): culturally targeted behavioral and normative beliefs + knowledge/skills + salience + environmental constraints/barriers counseling; Active Control (AC): nontargeted behavioral and normative beliefs + knowledge/skills + salience + environmental constraints/barriers counseling; or Standard Care Only (SCO). The primary outcome was attendance at the initial follow-up appointment. Secondary outcomes included delay in care, completion of care at 18 months, state anxiety (STAI Y-6), depressive symptoms (CES-D), and distress (CDDQ). Anxiety was assessed at enrollment, notification of results, and 7-14 days later with the CDDQ and CES-D. RESULTS:299 women were included in intent-to-treat analyses. Adherence rates were 60% (I), 54% (AC), and 58% (SCO), p = .73. Completion rates were 39% (I) and 35% in the AC and SCO groups, p = .77. Delay in care (in days) was (M ± SD): 58 ± 75 (I), 69 ± 72 (AC), and 54 ± 75 (SCO), p = .75. Adherence was associated with higher anxiety at notification, p < .01 and delay < 90 days (vs. 90+) was associated with greater perceived personal responsibility, p < .05. Women not completing their care (vs. those who did) had higher CES-D scores at enrollment, p < .05. CONCLUSIONS: A theory-based, culturally targeted message was not more effective than a nontargeted message or standard care in improving behavior.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a theory-based, culturally targeted intervention on adherence to follow-up among low-income and minority women who experience an abnormal Pap test. METHOD: 5,049 women were enrolled and underwent Pap testing. Of these, 378 had an abnormal result and 341 (90%) were randomized to one of three groups to receive their results: Intervention (I): culturally targeted behavioral and normative beliefs + knowledge/skills + salience + environmental constraints/barriers counseling; Active Control (AC): nontargeted behavioral and normative beliefs + knowledge/skills + salience + environmental constraints/barriers counseling; or Standard Care Only (SCO). The primary outcome was attendance at the initial follow-up appointment. Secondary outcomes included delay in care, completion of care at 18 months, state anxiety (STAI Y-6), depressive symptoms (CES-D), and distress (CDDQ). Anxiety was assessed at enrollment, notification of results, and 7-14 days later with the CDDQ and CES-D. RESULTS: 299 women were included in intent-to-treat analyses. Adherence rates were 60% (I), 54% (AC), and 58% (SCO), p = .73. Completion rates were 39% (I) and 35% in the AC and SCO groups, p = .77. Delay in care (in days) was (M ± SD): 58 ± 75 (I), 69 ± 72 (AC), and 54 ± 75 (SCO), p = .75. Adherence was associated with higher anxiety at notification, p < .01 and delay < 90 days (vs. 90+) was associated with greater perceived personal responsibility, p < .05. Women not completing their care (vs. those who did) had higher CES-D scores at enrollment, p < .05. CONCLUSIONS: A theory-based, culturally targeted message was not more effective than a nontargeted message or standard care in improving behavior.
Authors: K Robin Yabroff; Kathleen Shakira Washington; Amy Leader; Elizabeth Neilson; Jeanne Mandelblatt Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: A C Marcus; L A Crane; C P Kaplan; A E Reading; E Savage; J Gunning; G Bernstein; J S Berek Journal: Med Care Date: 1992-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Electra D Paskett; Donald Dudley; Gregory S Young; Brittany M Bernardo; Kristen J Wells; Elizabeth A Calhoun; Kevin Fiscella; Steven R Patierno; Victoria Warren-Mears; Tracy A Battaglia Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Siu-Kuen Azor Hui; Suzanne M Miller; Kuang-Yi Wen; Zhu Fang; Tianyu Li; Joanne Buzaglo; Enrique Hernandez Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2014-04-09
Authors: Shannon M Christy; Stacy N Davis; Kimberly R Williams; Xiuhua Zhao; Swapomthi K Govindaraju; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil; Hui-Yi Lin; Steven K Sutton; Richard R Roethzeim; David Shibata; Cathy D Meade; Clement K Gwede Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Priscilla Healey; Megan L Stager; Kyler Woodmass; Alan J Dettlaff; Andrew Vergara; Robert Janke; Susan J Wells Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2017-01-05 Impact factor: 2.655