BACKGROUND: The relative importance of different attitudes in predicting vaccination among healthcare personnel (HCP) is unclear. We hypothesized that HCP who feel at risk without vaccination or say they would regret not getting vaccinated would be more likely to get vaccinated than HCP who do not expect these emotional benefits. METHODS: A prospective cohort of 1544 HCP with direct patient care was enrolled from September 18 to December 18, 2010 at Scott & White Healthcare in Texas and Kaiser Permanente Northwest in Oregon and Washington. An Internet-based questionnaire assessed pre-season intention to be vaccinated and included 12 questions on attitudes about vaccination: single-item measures of perceived susceptibility and vaccine effectiveness, 5 items that were summed to form a concerns about vaccine scale, and 5 items summed to form an emotional benefits of vaccination scale. Influenza vaccination status for the 2010-2011 season and for 5 prior seasons was confirmed by medical record extraction. RESULTS: There were significant differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated HCP on all attitude items; 72% of vaccinated HCP agreed that they "worry less about getting the flu" if vaccinated, compared to only 26% of the unvaccinated (odds ratio=7.4, 95% confidence interval=5.8-9.5). In a multivariate model, the emotional benefits scale was the strongest predictor of 2010-2011 seasonal influenza vaccination, after adjusting for other attitude measures, prior vaccination history, and pre-season intention to be vaccinated. The predictive value of the emotional benefits scale was strongest for HCP with low pre-season intention to be vaccinated, where HCP vaccine receipt was 15% versus 83% for those with low versus high scores on the emotional benefits scale. CONCLUSIONS: The expected emotional benefits of vaccination strongly affect seasonal influenza vaccination among HCP, even after taking into account other attitudes, pre-season intentions, and prior vaccination history. These attitudes are promising targets for future vaccination campaigns. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
BACKGROUND: The relative importance of different attitudes in predicting vaccination among healthcare personnel (HCP) is unclear. We hypothesized that HCP who feel at risk without vaccination or say they would regret not getting vaccinated would be more likely to get vaccinated than HCP who do not expect these emotional benefits. METHODS: A prospective cohort of 1544 HCP with direct patient care was enrolled from September 18 to December 18, 2010 at Scott & White Healthcare in Texas and Kaiser Permanente Northwest in Oregon and Washington. An Internet-based questionnaire assessed pre-season intention to be vaccinated and included 12 questions on attitudes about vaccination: single-item measures of perceived susceptibility and vaccine effectiveness, 5 items that were summed to form a concerns about vaccine scale, and 5 items summed to form an emotional benefits of vaccination scale. Influenza vaccination status for the 2010-2011 season and for 5 prior seasons was confirmed by medical record extraction. RESULTS: There were significant differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated HCP on all attitude items; 72% of vaccinated HCP agreed that they "worry less about getting the flu" if vaccinated, compared to only 26% of the unvaccinated (odds ratio=7.4, 95% confidence interval=5.8-9.5). In a multivariate model, the emotional benefits scale was the strongest predictor of 2010-2011 seasonal influenza vaccination, after adjusting for other attitude measures, prior vaccination history, and pre-season intention to be vaccinated. The predictive value of the emotional benefits scale was strongest for HCP with low pre-season intention to be vaccinated, where HCP vaccine receipt was 15% versus 83% for those with low versus high scores on the emotional benefits scale. CONCLUSIONS: The expected emotional benefits of vaccination strongly affect seasonal influenza vaccination among HCP, even after taking into account other attitudes, pre-season intentions, and prior vaccination history. These attitudes are promising targets for future vaccination campaigns. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Authors: Irvin Jo Takayanagi; Maria Regina Alves Cardoso; Silvia F Costa; Marion Elke S Araya; Clarisse M Machado Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Silvia Vírseda; María Alejandra Restrepo; Elena Arranz; Purificación Magán-Tapia; Mario Fernández-Ruiz; Agustín Gómez de la Cámara; José María Aguado; Francisco López-Medrano Journal: Vaccine Date: 2010-05-14 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Michelle L Henninger; Stephanie A Irving; Mark Thompson; Lyndsay Ammon Avalos; Sarah W Ball; Pat Shifflett; Allison L Naleway Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Sarah Spencer; Manjusha Gaglani; Allison Naleway; Sue Reynolds; Sarah Ball; Sam Bozeman; Emily Henkle; Jennifer Meece; Mary Vandermause; Lydia Clipper; Mark Thompson Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2013-10-09 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Mary Patricia Nowalk; G K Balasubramani; Mallory Schaffer; Rhett H Lieberman; Heather Eng; Shakala Kyle; Stephen Wisniewski; Richard K Zimmerman; Donald B Middleton Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2015-07
Authors: Mary Patricia Nowalk; G K Balasubramani; Richard K Zimmerman; Todd M Bear; Theresa Sax; Heather Eng; Michael Susick; Samantha E Ford Journal: Health Promot Pract Date: 2018-07-13
Authors: Mark G Thompson; Allison Naleway; Alicia M Fry; Sarah Ball; Sarah M Spencer; Sue Reynolds; Sam Bozeman; Min Levine; Jacqueline M Katz; Manjusha Gaglani Journal: Vaccine Date: 2016-02-10 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Ryan Malosh; Suzanne E Ohmit; Joshua G Petrie; Mark G Thompson; Allison E Aiello; Arnold S Monto Journal: Vaccine Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 3.641