BACKGROUND: This observational study followed a cohort of pregnant women during the 2010-2011 influenza season to determine factors associated with vaccination. METHODS: Participants were 1105 pregnant women who completed a survey assessing health beliefs related to vaccination upon enrollment and were then followed to determine vaccination status by the end of the 2010-2011 influenza season. We conducted univariate and multivariate analyses to explore factors associated with vaccination status and a factor analysis of survey items to identify health beliefs associated with vaccination. RESULTS: Sixty-three percent (n=701) of the participants were vaccinated. In the univariate analyses, multiple factors were associated with vaccination status, including maternal age, race, marital status, educational level, and gravidity. Factor analysis identified two health belief factors associated with vaccination: participant's positive views (factor 1) and negative views (factor 2) of influenza vaccination. In a multivariate logistic regression model, factor 1 was associated with increased likelihood of vaccination (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=2.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.72-2.78), whereas factor 2 was associated with decreased likelihood of vaccination (aOR=0.36; 95% CI=0.28-0.46). After controlling for the two health belief factors in multivariate analyses, demographic factors significant in univariate analyses were no longer significant. Women who received a provider recommendation were about three times more likely to be vaccinated (aOR=3.14; 95% CI=1.99-4.96). CONCLUSION: Pregnant women's health beliefs about vaccination appear to be more important than demographic and maternal factors previously associated with vaccination status. Provider recommendation remains one of the most critical factors influencing vaccination during pregnancy.
BACKGROUND: This observational study followed a cohort of pregnant women during the 2010-2011 influenza season to determine factors associated with vaccination. METHODS:Participants were 1105 pregnant women who completed a survey assessing health beliefs related to vaccination upon enrollment and were then followed to determine vaccination status by the end of the 2010-2011 influenza season. We conducted univariate and multivariate analyses to explore factors associated with vaccination status and a factor analysis of survey items to identify health beliefs associated with vaccination. RESULTS: Sixty-three percent (n=701) of the participants were vaccinated. In the univariate analyses, multiple factors were associated with vaccination status, including maternal age, race, marital status, educational level, and gravidity. Factor analysis identified two health belief factors associated with vaccination: participant's positive views (factor 1) and negative views (factor 2) of influenza vaccination. In a multivariate logistic regression model, factor 1 was associated with increased likelihood of vaccination (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=2.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.72-2.78), whereas factor 2 was associated with decreased likelihood of vaccination (aOR=0.36; 95% CI=0.28-0.46). After controlling for the two health belief factors in multivariate analyses, demographic factors significant in univariate analyses were no longer significant. Women who received a provider recommendation were about three times more likely to be vaccinated (aOR=3.14; 95% CI=1.99-4.96). CONCLUSION: Pregnant women's health beliefs about vaccination appear to be more important than demographic and maternal factors previously associated with vaccination status. Provider recommendation remains one of the most critical factors influencing vaccination during pregnancy.
Authors: Mark G Thompson; Manjusha J Gaglani; Allison Naleway; Sarah Ball; Emily M Henkle; Leslie Z Sokolow; Beth Brennan; Hong Zhou; Lydia Foster; Carla Black; Erin D Kennedy; Sam Bozeman; Lisa A Grohskopf; David K Shay Journal: Vaccine Date: 2012-04-01 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Noel T Brewer; Gretchen B Chapman; Frederick X Gibbons; Meg Gerrard; Kevin D McCaul; Neil D Weinstein Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Sonja A Rasmussen; Dmitry M Kissin; Lorraine F Yeung; Kitty MacFarlane; Susan Y Chu; Reina M Turcios-Ruiz; Elizabeth W Mitchell; Jennifer Williams; Alicia M Fry; Jeffrey Hageman; Timothy M Uyeki; Denise J Jamieson Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-02-18 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Ousseny Zerbo; G Thomas Ray; Lea Zhang; Kristin Goddard; Bruce Fireman; Alyce Adams; Saad Omer; Martin Kulldorff; Nicola P Klein Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2020-11-02 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Amanda F Dempsey; Sarah E Brewer; Carter Sevick; Jennifer Pyrzanowski; Sara Mazzoni; Sean T O'Leary Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2015-10-02 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Carmen S Arriola; Nancy Vasconez; Mark Thompson; Sara Mirza; Ann C Moen; Joseph Bresee; Ivy Talavera; Alba María Ropero Journal: Vaccine Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Matthew Z Dudley; Rupali J Limaye; Daniel A Salmon; Saad B Omer; Sean T O'Leary; Mallory K Ellingson; Christine I Spina; Sarah E Brewer; Robert A Bednarczyk; Fauzia Malik; Paula M Frew; Allison T Chamberlain Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2021-01-28 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Gillian K SteelFisher; Hannah L Caporello; Cheryl S Broussard; Thomas J Schafer; Eran N Ben-Porath; Robert J Blendon Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2021-02-02 Impact factor: 3.017