Literature DB >> 22475294

Time course of free-choice priming effects explained by a simple accumulator model.

Uwe Mattler1, Simon Palmer.   

Abstract

Unconscious visual stimuli can be processed by human observers and modulate their behavior. This has been shown for masked prime stimuli that influence motor responses to subsequent target stimuli. Beyond this, masked stimuli can also affect participants' behavior when they are free to choose one of two response alternatives. This finding demonstrates that an apparently free-choice between alternative behaviors can be subject to influences that are outside of awareness. We report three experiments which exhibit that the temporal dynamic of free-choice priming effects corresponds to that of forced-choice priming effects. Forced-choice priming effects were relatively robust against variations of prime stimuli but sensitive to physical features of target stimuli. Free-choice priming effects, in contrast, depended largely on the stimulus-response compatibility of the prime. A simple accumulator model which accounts for forced-choice response priming can also explain free-choice priming effects by the assumption that unconscious stimuli can initiate motor responses when participants are engaged in a speeded choice-reaction time task. According to our analyses free-choice priming results from a response selection mechanism which integrates conscious and unconscious information from external, stimulus driven sources and also from internal sources.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22475294     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  14 in total

1.  Why free choices take longer than forced choices: evidence from response threshold manipulations.

Authors:  Christoph Naefgen; Michael Dambacher; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-08-03

2.  Influencing choices with conversational primes: How a magic trick unconsciously influences card choices.

Authors:  Alice Pailhès; Gustav Kuhn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The benefit of no choice: goal-directed plans enhance perceptual processing.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Michael Dambacher; Maik Bieleke; Peter M Gollwitzer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-12

4.  Response priming with motion primes: negative compatibility or congruency effects, even in free-choice trials.

Authors:  Christina Bermeitinger; Ryan P Hackländer
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2018-02-24

5.  Response control by primes, targets, and distractors: from feedforward activation to controlled inhibition.

Authors:  Filipp Schmidt; Thomas Schmidt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-08-05

6.  Effect of Aging on Change of Intention.

Authors:  Ariel Furstenberg; Callum D Dewar; Haim Sompolinsky; Robert T Knight; Leon Y Deouell
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  No differences in dual-task costs between forced- and free-choice tasks.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Sophie Nolden; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-06-20

8.  Cross-modal plasticity in the deaf enhances processing of masked stimuli in the visual modality.

Authors:  Seema Prasad; Gouri Shanker Patil; Ramesh Kumar Mishra
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  What We Talk about When We Talk about Unconscious Processing - A Plea for Best Practices.

Authors:  Marcus Rothkirch; Guido Hesselmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-23

10.  Temporal dynamics of sequential motor activation in a dual-prime paradigm: Insights from conditional accuracy and hazard functions.

Authors:  Maximilian P Wolkersdorfer; Sven Panis; Thomas Schmidt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.