Literature DB >> 22469798

Prognostic impact of lymph node harvest and lymph node ratio in patients with colon cancer.

Ole H Sjo1, Marianne A Merok, Aud Svindland, Arild Nesbakken.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of the number of lymph nodes and ratio in colon cancer is still debated.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate lymph node harvest in patients with colon cancer over time, and to test the hypotheses that investigation of more lymph nodes, and low lymph node ratio in stage III patients, has positive prognostic impact.
DESIGN: This is a prospective, observational study. SETTINGS: This study was conducted in a single institution treating all patients with colon cancer in a defined catchment area. PATIENTS: All patients admitted in the period 1993 to 2009 (n = 1481) were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were the number of examined regional lymph nodes according to treatment period, 5-year overall survival and time to recurrence, and univariate (Kaplan-Meier) and multivariate (Cox regression) analyses of prognostic factors.
RESULTS: Nine hundred fifty (65%) patients underwent curative resection. Median number of examined lymph nodes increased from 7 to 15 (p < 0.001), and the proportion of patients with stage III disease increased from 25% to 33% (p = 0.02) during the study period. In patients with stage I to III disease, time to recurrence (proportion of patients without recurrence or death of colon cancer) improved from 65% to 82% during the period (p < 0.001). An association between lymph node count (<8 compared with ≥ 12) and overall survival was found for patients with stage II disease (57% vs 71%, p = 0.004). Hazard ratio for death within 5 years was 0.7 (p = 0.043) when 8 to 11 nodes were examined and 0.6 (p = 0.001) when ≥ 12 nodes were examined (<8 reference). In patients with stage III disease, increasing lymph node ratio was associated with reduced overall survival and time to recurrence in uni- and multivariate analyses. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the small number of patients in each stage.
CONCLUSIONS: The number of examined lymph nodes increased in the study period. A stage migration was observed, and time to recurrence improved in patients with stage I to III disease. In patients with stage III disease, lymph node ratio was a stronger prognostic factor than the total number of lymph nodes examined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22469798     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182423f62

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  41 in total

1.  Extended lymphadenectomy in colon cancer is crucial.

Authors:  Hermann Kessler; Werner Hohenberger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  The positive impact of surgical quality control on adequate lymph node harvest by standardized laparoscopic surgery and national quality assessment program in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Daeyoun David Won; Sung Bong Choi; Yoon Suk Lee; Seong Taek Oh; Jun Gi Kim; In Kyu Lee
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: where do we stand?

Authors:  Mukta K Krane; Alessandro Fichera
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Extended lymphadenectomy in colon cancer is debatable.

Authors:  Jamie Murphy; Tonia Young-Fadok
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Emergency surgery for colorectal cancer does not affect nodal harvest comparing elective procedures: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Gianluca Costa; Laura Lorenzon; Giulia Massa; Barbara Frezza; Mario Ferri; Pietro Fransvea; Paolo Mercantini; Maria Cristina Giustiniani; Genoveffa Balducci
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Debating deposits: an interobserver variability study of lymph nodes and pericolonic tumor deposits in colonic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jonathan B Rock; M Kay Washington; N Volkan Adsay; Joel K Greenson; Elizabeth A Montgomery; Marie E Robert; Rhonda K Yantiss; Amy M Lehman; Wendy L Frankel
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 5.534

7.  Lymph node ratio improves TNM and Astler-Coller's assessment of colorectal cancer prognosis: an analysis of 761 node positive cases.

Authors:  Renato Costi; Filippo Beggi; Valeria Reggiani; Matteo Riccò; Pellegrino Crafa; Melissa Bersanelli; Francesco Tartamella; Vincenzo Violi; Luigi Roncoroni; Leopoldo Sarli
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Possible biological and translational significance of mast cells density in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ilaria Marech; Michele Ammendola; Claudia Gadaleta; Nicola Zizzo; Caroline Oakley; Cosmo Damiano Gadaleta; Girolamo Ranieri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  The impact of the lymph node ratio is greater than traditional lymph node status in stage III colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Yen-Jung Lu; Pei-Ching Lin; Chun-Chi Lin; Huann-Sheng Wang; Shung-Haur Yang; Jeng-Kai Jiang; Yuan-Tzu Lan; Tzu-Chen Lin; Wen-Yi Liang; Wei-Shone Chen; Jen-Kou Lin; Shih-Ching Chang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Establishing the optimum lymph node yield for diagnosis of stage III rectal cancer.

Authors:  A Bhangu; R P Kiran; G Brown; R Goldin; P Tekkis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.