Literature DB >> 28190102

The positive impact of surgical quality control on adequate lymph node harvest by standardized laparoscopic surgery and national quality assessment program in colorectal cancer.

Daeyoun David Won1, Sung Bong Choi2, Yoon Suk Lee3, Seong Taek Oh1, Jun Gi Kim1, In Kyu Lee4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to present the factors associated with lymph node harvest (LNH) and seek whether surgical quality control measures can improve LNH.
METHODS: From a prospectively collected data at a single institution, 874 CRC patients who underwent curative surgery between 2004 and 2013 were included. Factor and survival analyses were performed regarding LNH. Subgroup analysis was performed according to LNH group (LNH ≥ 12 vs LNH < 12) and year of surgery (2004-2008, 2009-2011, and 2012-2013 group).
RESULTS: In the multivariate analysis, tumor location (OR 0.6, p < 0.001), stage (OR 1.95, p < 0.001), and year of surgery (OR 3.86, p < 0.001) showed an association with adequate LNH. In the subgroup analysis categorized by the year of surgery, surgical quality control measures by standardized laparoscopic surgery (OR 52.91, p < 0.001) showed notable association with adequate LNH. Comparing the 2009-2011 and 2012-2013 group, the national quality assessment program additionally improved adequate LNH percentage (83.9 vs 94.3%). In the survival analysis, disease-free survival (DFS) differed according to year of surgery, standardized laparoscopic surgery with high vascular ligation, and adequate LNH by stage. In the overall survival (OS) analysis, the LNH-related factors did not show significant difference.
CONCLUSIONS: Through standardized laparoscopic surgery with high vascular ligation and national quality assessment program, surgical quality control had a positive impact on the increase of adequate LNH. Improving the modifiable LNH factors resulted in the enhancement of adequate LNH and related DFS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Lymph node harvest; National quality assessment program; Standardized laparoscopic surgery; Surgical quality control

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28190102     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-017-2771-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  23 in total

1.  Pathological examination of 12 regional lymph nodes and long-term survival in stages I-III colon cancer patients: an analysis of 2,056 consecutive patients in two branches of same institution.

Authors:  Hong Hwa Chen; Dilip Chakravarty K; Jeng-Yi Wang; Chung-Rong Changchien; Reiping Tang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Understanding optimal colonic cancer surgery: comparison of Japanese D3 resection and European complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation.

Authors:  Nicholas P West; Hirotoshi Kobayashi; Keiichi Takahashi; Aristoteles Perrakis; Klaus Weber; Werner Hohenberger; Kenichi Sugihara; Philip Quirke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Individual surgeon, pathologist, and other factors affecting lymph node harvest in stage II colon carcinoma. is a minimum of 12 examined lymph nodes sufficient?

Authors:  Luca Stocchi; Victor W Fazio; Ian Lavery; Jeff Hammel
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Prognostic impact of lymph node harvest and lymph node ratio in patients with colon cancer.

Authors:  Ole H Sjo; Marianne A Merok; Aud Svindland; Arild Nesbakken
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Clinical and pathologic factors that predict lymph node yield from surgical specimens in colorectal cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Joanne F Chou; David Row; Mithat Gonen; Yi-Hai Liu; Deborah Schrag; Martin R Weiser
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Effect of high and intermediate ligation on survival and recurrence rates following curative resection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C A Slanetz; R Grimson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  The impact of surgeon and pathologist on lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer and its impact on survival for patients with Dukes' stage B disease.

Authors:  M D Evans; K Barton; A Rees; J D Stamatakis; S S Karandikar
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.788

8.  Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  J Lujan; G Valero; Q Hernandez; A Sanchez; M D Frutos; P Parrilla
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 9.  Lymph node revealing solutions in colorectal cancer: should they be used routinely?

Authors:  Joanne Horne; Adrian C Bateman; Norman J Carr; Isobel Ryder
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Should total number of lymph nodes be used as a quality of care measure for stage III colon cancer?

Authors:  Jiping Wang; Mahmoud Kulaylat; Howard Rockette; James Hassett; Ashwani Rajput; Kelli Bullard Dunn; Merril Dayton
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Quality indicators for colon cancer surgery : Evidence-based development of a set of indicators for the outcome quality].

Authors:  J Hardt; H-J Buhr; C Klinger; S Benz; K Ludwig; J Kalff; S Post
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Application of Laparoscopy in Comprehensive Staging Operation of Ovarian Cancer Based on Electronic Medical Blockchain Technology.

Authors:  Limei Zhang; Xinrui Li; Yao Ning; Yufei Cai
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.682

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.