Literature DB >> 33219074

Barriers to Patient Portal Access and Use: Evidence from the Health Information National Trends Survey.

Sherine El-Toukhy1, Alejandra Méndez2, Shavonne Collins2, Eliseo J Pérez-Stable2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient access to their medical records through patient portals (PPs) facilitates information exchange and provision of quality health care. Understanding factors that characterize patients with limited access to and use of PPs is needed.
METHODS: Data were from the 2017-2018 Health Information National Trends Survey 5, Cycles 1 and 2, a nationally representative survey of US adults ≥ 18 years old (n = 6789). Weighted multivariate logistic regressions modeled the associations between patient characteristics and access to, facilitators of use, and use of PPs and their functions.
RESULTS: Individuals without (vs with) a regular doctor (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.4; CI, 0.3-0.5) or health insurance (aOR, 0.4; CI, 0.2-0.7), those with high school (aOR 0.4; CI, 0.3-0.5) or with vocational/some college (aOR, 0.5; CI, 04.-0.7) education (vs college/postgraduate), or those with limited English proficiency (vs those who speak English very well) (aOR, 0.7; CI, 0.5-0.9) were less likely to report accessing their personal medical records. Women (vs men) were more likely to report accessing their medical records (aOR, 1.5; CI, 1.2-1.8). Similar patterns were found for PPs access and facilitators of use. Less consistent associations emerged between patient characteristics and use of PP functionalities.
CONCLUSIONS: PP access and use are low. Having a primary care clinician, patient's educational attainment, and being a woman were factors associated with PP access and use, but not race/ethnicity. Once access was achieved, use of PP functionalities was generally uniform across demographic segments. Facilitating PP access and use among all patient populations is warranted. © Copyright 2020 by the American Board of Family Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic Health Records; Information Technology; Limited English Proficiency; Logistic Models; Medical Informatics; Patient Portals; Personal Health Records; Primary Health Care; Surveys and Questionnaires; Telemedicine

Year:  2020        PMID: 33219074      PMCID: PMC7849369          DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.06.190402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  46 in total

1.  The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records.

Authors:  David Blumenthal; Marilyn Tavenner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The inverse care law: implications for healthcare of vulnerable populations.

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Peter Shin
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec

3.  Insurance or a regular physician: which is the most powerful predictor of health care?

Authors:  C M Sox; K Swartz; H R Burstin; T A Brennan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Women as health care decision-makers: implications for health care coverage in the United States.

Authors:  Sabrina Matoff-Stepp; Bethany Applebaum; Jennifer Pooler; Erin Kavanagh
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2014-11

5.  A vision for patient-centered health information systems.

Authors:  Alex H Krist; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Patient-Perceived Facilitators of and Barriers to Electronic Portal Use: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kimberly R Powell
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Blue Button use by patients to access and share health record information using the Department of Veterans Affairs' online patient portal.

Authors:  Carolyn Turvey; Dawn Klein; Gemmae Fix; Timothy P Hogan; Susan Woods; Steven R Simon; Mary Charlton; Mary Vaughan-Sarrazin; Donna M Zulman; Lilian Dindo; Bonnie Wakefield; Gail Graham; Kim Nazi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 8.  Personal Health Records: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Alex Roehrs; Cristiano André da Costa; Rodrigo da Rosa Righi; Kleinner Silva Farias de Oliveira
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Integrated personal health records: transformative tools for consumer-centric care.

Authors:  Don Detmer; Meryl Bloomrosen; Brian Raymond; Paul Tang
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Disparities in registration and use of an online patient portal among older adults: findings from the LitCog cohort.

Authors:  Samuel G Smith; Rachel O'Conor; William Aitken; Laura M Curtis; Michael S Wolf; Mita Sanghavi Goel
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  4 in total

1.  Outpatient portal use in prenatal care: differential use by race, risk, and area social determinants of health.

Authors:  Priti Singh; Pallavi Jonnalagadda; Evan Morgan; Naleef Fareed
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Impact of Telemedicine Modalities on Equitable Access to Ambulatory Gastroenterology Care.

Authors:  Nicolette J Rodriguez; Noreen C Okwara; Lin Shen; Kunal Jajoo; Walter W Chan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 33.883

3.  Patient Portals: Useful for Whom and for What? A Cross-Sectional Analysis of National Survey Data.

Authors:  Christine M Swoboda; Matthew J DePuccio; Naleef Fareed; Ann Scheck McAlearney; Daniel M Walker
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.762

4.  Socioeconomic deprivation, age and language are barriers to accessing personal health records: a cross-sectional study of a large hospital-based personal health record system.

Authors:  Rachel Chapman; Shamil Haroon; Nikita Simms-Williams; Neeraj Bhala; Foyzal Miah; Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar; James Ferguson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.