Literature DB >> 29881076

Anchor Selection Using the Wald Test Anchor-All-Test-All Procedure.

Mian Wang1, Carol M Woods2.   

Abstract

Methods for testing differential item functioning (DIF) require that the reference and focal groups are linked on a common scale using group-invariant anchor items. Several anchor-selection strategies have been introduced in an item response theory framework. However, popular strategies often utilize likelihood ratio testing with all-others-as-anchors that requires multiple model fittings. The current study explored alternative anchor-selection strategies based on a modified version of the Wald χ2 test that is implemented in flexMIRT and IRTPRO, and made comparisons with methods based on the popular likelihood ratio test. Accuracies of anchor identification of four different strategies (two testing methods combined with two selection criteria), along with the power and Type I error associated with respective follow-up DIF tests, will be presented. Implications for applied researchers and suggestions for future research will be discussed.

Keywords:  Wald’s test; all-others-as-anchors; anchor selection; anchor-all-test-all; differential item functioning; likelihood ratio test

Year:  2016        PMID: 29881076      PMCID: PMC5978488          DOI: 10.1177/0146621616668014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0146-6216


  9 in total

1.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease.

Authors:  N MANTEL; W HAENSZEL
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Solving the measurement invariance anchor item problem in item response theory.

Authors:  Adam W Meade; Natalie A Wright
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2012-04-02

3.  A Cautionary Note on Using G(2)(dif) to Assess Relative Model Fit in Categorical Data Analysis.

Authors:  Albert Maydeu-Olivares; Li Cai
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: toward a unified strategy.

Authors:  Stephen Stark; Oleksandr S Chernyshenko; Fritz Drasgow
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2006-11

5.  SEM of another flavour: two new applications of the supplemented EM algorithm.

Authors:  Li Cai
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 3.380

6.  Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for night eating syndrome using item response theory analysis.

Authors:  Kelly C Allison; Scott G Engel; Ross D Crosby; Martina de Zwaan; John P O'Reardon; Stephen A Wonderlich; James E Mitchell; Delia Smith West; Thomas A Wadden; Albert J Stunkard
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2008-05-10

7.  Item response theory analyses of parent and teacher ratings of the ADHD symptoms for recoded dichotomous scores.

Authors:  Rapson Gomez; Alasdair Vance; Andre Gomez
Journal:  J Atten Disord       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.256

8.  Item response theory in personality assessment: a demonstration using the MMPI-2 depression scale.

Authors:  R A Childs; W G Dahlstrom; S M Kemp; A T Panter
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2000-03

9.  DSM criteria for major depression: evaluating symptom patterns using latent-trait item response models.

Authors:  Steven H Aggen; Michael C Neale; Kenneth S Kendler
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.723

  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  A signal detection-item response theory model for evaluating neuropsychological measures.

Authors:  Michael L Thomas; Gregory G Brown; Ruben C Gur; Tyler M Moore; Virginie M Patt; Victoria B Risbrough; Dewleen G Baker
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.475

2.  TBI-CareQOL military health care frustration in caregivers of service members/veterans with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Noelle E Carlozzi; Rael T Lange; Louis M French; Michael A Kallen; Nicholas R Boileau; Robin A Hanks; Risa Nakase-Richardson; Jill P Massengale; Angelle M Sander; Elizabeth A Hahn; Jennifer A Miner; Tracey A Brickell
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2020-01-09

3.  Differential item functioning of the CAHPS® In-Center Hemodialysis Survey.

Authors:  Claude M Setodji; John D Peipert; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Differential Item Functioning Analyses of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Measures: Methods, Challenges, Advances, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; Chun Wang; Marjorie Kleinman; Richard N Jones; David J Weiss
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Development of Reliable and Valid Negative Mood Screening Tools for Orthopaedic Patients with Musculoskeletal Pain.

Authors:  Trevor A Lentz; Michael A Kallen; Daniel Deutscher; Steven Z George
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  Using restricted factor analysis to select anchor items and detect differential item functioning.

Authors:  Laura Kolbe; Terrence D Jorgensen
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-02

7.  Evaluations of the sum-score-based and item response theory-based tests of group mean differences under various simulation conditions.

Authors:  Mian Wang; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 3.021

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.