Literature DB >> 22468805

Everyday attention failures: an individual differences investigation.

Nash Unsworth1, Brittany D McMillan, Gene A Brewer, Gregory J Spillers.   

Abstract

The present study examined individual differences in everyday attention failures. Undergraduate students completed various cognitive ability measures in the laboratory and recorded everyday attention failures in a diary over the course of a week. The majority of attention failures were failures of distraction or mind wandering in educational contexts (in class or while studying). Latent variable techniques were used to perform analyses, and the results suggested that individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control were related to some but not all everyday attention failures. Furthermore, everyday attention failures predicted SAT scores and partially accounted for the relation between cognitive abilities and SAT scores. These results provide important evidence for individual differences in everyday attention failures as well as for the ecological validity of laboratory measures of working memory capacity and attention control.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22468805     DOI: 10.1037/a0028075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  27 in total

Review 1.  A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

2.  Working Memory Capacity, Mind Wandering, and Creative Cognition: An Individual-Differences Investigation into the Benefits of Controlled Versus Spontaneous Thought.

Authors:  Bridget A Smeekens; Michael J Kane
Journal:  Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts       Date:  2016-02-15

3.  Neuropsychological Correlates of Changes in Driving Behavior Among Clinically Healthy Older Adults.

Authors:  Andrew J Aschenbrenner; Samantha A Murphy; Jason M Doherty; Ann M Johnson; Sayeh Bayat; Alexis Walker; Yasmin Peña; Jason Hassenstab; John C Morris; Ganesh M Babulal
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.942

4.  Association of Personality with Cognitive Failure among Japanese Middle-Aged and Older Adults.

Authors:  Hajime Iwasa; Yuko Yoshida; Yoshiko Ishioka; Yoshimi Suzukamo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-12       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Study on Factors That Influence Human Errors: Focused on Cabin Crew.

Authors:  Jiyoung Kim; Myoungjin Yu; Sunghyup Sean Hyun
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Pupillary correlates of lapses of sustained attention.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and the regulation of arousal.

Authors:  Matthew K Robison; Gene A Brewer
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Studying in the region of proximal learning reduces mind wandering.

Authors:  Judy Xu; Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-07

9.  Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of everyday memory lapses in older adults.

Authors:  Courtney McAlister; Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2016-01-25

10.  Beyond perceptual load and dilution: a review of the role of working memory in selective attention.

Authors:  Jan W de Fockert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.