Literature DB >> 32651927

Individual differences in working memory capacity and the regulation of arousal.

Matthew K Robison1, Gene A Brewer2.   

Abstract

Previously it has been theorized that differential functioning of the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine (LC-NE) system affects people's ability to regulate arousal, which has impacts on cognitive abilities. In the present study, we investigated three potential mechanisms by which the LC-NE system can fail to regulate arousal appropriately: hypoarousal, hyperarousal, and dysregulation of arousal. Each of these three could potentially account for why arousal affects cognition. To test the contributions of these three mechanisms, the present study examined individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) and the regulation of arousal using pupillometry. Participants completed multiple complex span and visual arrays change-detection measures of WMC. An eye-tracker recorded pupil diameter as participants completed the visual arrays tasks. We found rather mixed evidence for the three mechanisms. Arousal dysregulation correlated with lower visual arrays performance and more self-reported attentional lapses. However, arousal regulation did not correlate with complex span performance. There was also some evidence for hypoarousal as an explanatory mechanism, as arousal correlated with attentional lapses. We discuss the implications of the results for theories regarding the role of arousal regulation in cognitive performance and individual differences in cognitive abilities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arousal; Attention control; Locus coeruleus; Norepinephrine; Working memory capacity

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32651927     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02077-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  51 in total

1.  On the capacity of attention: its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Emily M Elliott; J Scott Saults; Candice C Morey; Sam Mattox; Anna Hismjatullina; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  A dual-networks architecture of top-down control.

Authors:  Nico U F Dosenbach; Damien A Fair; Alexander L Cohen; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Shared and distinct oculomotor function deficits in schizophrenia and obsessive compulsive disorder.

Authors:  Angeliki Damilou; Sotirios Apostolakis; Eleftheria Thrapsanioti; Christos Theleritis; Nikolaos Smyrnis
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Simple viewing tests can detect eye movement abnormalities that distinguish schizophrenia cases from controls with exceptional accuracy.

Authors:  Philip J Benson; Sara A Beedie; Elizabeth Shephard; Ina Giegling; Dan Rujescu; David St Clair
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 5.  The default network and self-generated thought: component processes, dynamic control, and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Jessica R Andrews-Hanna; Jonathan Smallwood; R Nathan Spreng
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 6.  Inverted-U-shaped dopamine actions on human working memory and cognitive control.

Authors:  Roshan Cools; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 7.  The locus coeruleus-noradrenergic system: modulation of behavioral state and state-dependent cognitive processes.

Authors:  Craig W Berridge; Barry D Waterhouse
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2003-04

8.  The relation between antisaccade errors, fixation stability and prosaccade errors in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jason J S Barton; Manisha Pandita; Katy Thakkar; Donald C Goff; Dara S Manoach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Dopamine and inhibitory action control: evidence from spontaneous eye blink rates.

Authors:  Lorenza Serena Colzato; Wery P M van den Wildenberg; Nelleke C van Wouwe; Merel M Pannebakker; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The effects of neural gain on attention and learning.

Authors:  Eran Eldar; Jonathan D Cohen; Yael Niv
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.