Literature DB >> 22468153

Open fractures of the femur in children: analysis of various treatment methods.

Patrick Allison, Noémi Dahan-Oliel, Victor T Jando, Stephen Su Yang, Reggie C Hamdy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of children who presented with open femur fractures.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all children treated for open femur fractures at the McGill University Health Center between 1980 and 2009 was conducted. Thirty-seven patients (28 males and 9 females) were identified. Union was determined clinically by the absence of pain, tenderness to palpation and crepitus with motion. Complications were reported.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 11.5 years (range 2.8-18.1 years). The mechanism of injury involved motor vehicle-related injuries in 70% of cases. There were 13 Grade I, 15 Grade II and 9 Grade III fractures. The treatment involved traction and hip spica in 11 patients, external fixator in nine patients, intramedullary nailing in seven patients, open reduction and internal fixation in six patients, and traction and an ischial weight bearing brace in four patients. Average time to union was 5.1 months (range 1.5-14.4 months). Infections occurred in ten patients, nine had delayed unions, two developed malunions, four had a refracture and four patients developed a limb length discrepancy >2 cm.
CONCLUSIONS: Open fractures of the femur are often accompanied by associated injuries, indicating the importance of early and comprehensive treatment. Treatment may include hip spica application in school-age children and solid intramedullary nails in adolescents. In children with multiple injuries, specifically those with higher fracture grades, treatment with an external fixator provides immediate stability of the fracture and allows early mobilization and ease of management of associated injuries.

Entities:  

Keywords:  External fixation; Intra-medullary nailing; Open femur fracture; Pediatric fracture; Traction and hip spica cast; Treatment methods

Year:  2011        PMID: 22468153      PMCID: PMC3058202          DOI: 10.1007/s11832-011-0334-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Orthop        ISSN: 1863-2521            Impact factor:   1.548


  37 in total

Review 1.  A review of unintentional injuries in adolescents.

Authors:  David A Sleet; Michael F Ballesteros; Nagesh N Borse
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 2.  Modern trends for external fixation of fractures in children: a critical review.

Authors:  J B Hull; M J Bell
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  External fixation of displaced femoral shaft fractures in children: a consecutive study of 98 fractures.

Authors:  Hanne Hedin; Kerstin Hjorth; Lars Rehnberg; Sune Larsson
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses.

Authors:  R B Gustilo; J T Anderson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The use of external fixators in the immobilization of pediatric fractures.

Authors:  D Norman; B Peskin; A Ehrenraich; N Rosenberg; G Bar-Joseph; V Bialik
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 6.  Fractures in children.

Authors:  R D Blasier; J Aronson
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.856

7.  Motocross morbidity: economic cost and injury distribution in children.

Authors:  A Noelle Larson; Anthony A Stans; William J Shaughnessy; Mark B Dekutoski; Michael J Quinn; Amy L McIntosh
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  Is external fixation in pediatric femoral fractures a risk factor for refracture?

Authors:  Cumhur Cevdet Kesemenli; Mehmet Subasi; Hüseyin Arslan; Tolga Tüzüner; Serdar Necmioglu; Ahmet Kapukaya
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.324

9.  The increasing problem of motorcycle injuries in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Catherine A Bevan; Franz E Babl; Penny Bolt; Lisa N Sharwood
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 7.738

10.  Femoral shaft fracture in 265 children. Log-normal correlation with age of speed of healing.

Authors:  S V Skak; T T Jensen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1988-12
View more
  7 in total

1.  [Femoral shaft fractures in children under 3 years old. Current treatment standard].

Authors:  P C Strohm; P P Schmittenbecher
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Systematic review of spica casting for the treatment of paediatric diaphyseal femur fractures.

Authors:  R T Tisherman; J S Hoellwarth; S A Mendelson
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 1.548

3.  Management of Orthopaedic Injuries in Multiply Injured Child.

Authors:  Om Lahoti; Anand Arya
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  Optimizing Management of Open Fractures in Children.

Authors:  Akshat Sharma; Vikas Gupta; Kumar Shashikant
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  Pediatric Open Long-Bone Fracture and Subsequent Deep Infection Risk: The Importance of Early Hospital Care.

Authors:  Andrew W Kuhn; Stockton C Troyer; Jeffrey E Martus
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-17

6.  Treatment of pediatric open femoral fractures with external fixator versus flexible intramedullary nails.

Authors:  Hossein Aslani; Ali Tabrizi; Ali Sadighi; Ahmad R Mirbolook
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2013-12-15

7.  Treatment of open pediatric tibial fractures by external fixation versus flexible intramedullary nailing: a comparative study.

Authors:  Hossein Aslani; Ali Tabrizi; Ali Sadighi; Ahmad Reza Mirblok
Journal:  Arch Trauma Res       Date:  2013-12-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.