Literature DB >> 12228797

The use of external fixators in the immobilization of pediatric fractures.

D Norman1, B Peskin, A Ehrenraich, N Rosenberg, G Bar-Joseph, V Bialik.   

Abstract

The use of external fixation in the immobilization of diaphyseal and metaphyseal fractures in children is still controversial, as these fractures are generally managed by immediate plaster casting, by traction followed by casting, by various methods of internal fixation, including the recently developed flexible rods, and by plating. Between 1982 and 1998, we treated 64 children with fractures of the long bones of the lower limb using external fixation, 44 of whom were available for follow-up (46 fractures). Their average age on the day of injury was 8.l years. Average follow-up extended for 4 years. The external fixation used was left in place for an average of 67 days. Full range of movement was achieved in 42 children (44 limbs). The longitudinal axis was anatomically correct (<5 degrees angulation) in 40 children (42 limbs). Due to malalignment of the fracture (15 degrees varus) in one child, tibial osteotomy was performed 4 years after fracture healing. There was no leg length discrepancy in 38 children, and shortening of >2 cm was measured in the fractured limbs of 2 children. We found the use of external fixators to be easy, quick, with a short learning curve, and appropriate for comminuted and closed fractures of the long bones, and especially for children with polytrauma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12228797     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-001-0383-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  8 in total

1.  [Fracture stabilization in polytraumatized children].

Authors:  P C Strohm; P P Schmittenbecher
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [Injury pattern and clinical course of children with multiple injuries in comparison to adults, Ab 11-year analysis at a clinic of maximum utilization].

Authors:  C Gatzka; P G C Begemann; A Wolff; J Zörb; J M Rueger; J Windolf
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Open fractures of the femur in children: analysis of various treatment methods.

Authors:  Patrick Allison; Noémi Dahan-Oliel; Victor T Jando; Stephen Su Yang; Reggie C Hamdy
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 4.  Outcomes and complications following flexible intramedullary nailing for the treatment of tibial fractures in children: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli; Gerardo Perrotta; Fabio Stocco; Joshua Agilinko; Davide Castioni; Michele Mercurio; Giorgio Gasparini; Simon Barker
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Pediatric Tibial Shaft Fractures.

Authors:  Nirav K Patel; Joanna Horstman; Victoria Kuester; Senthil Sambandam; Varatharaj Mounasamy
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  External fixation versus elastic stable intramedullary nailing in the treatment of open tibial shaft fractures in children.

Authors:  Pan Hong; Saroj Rai; Xin Tang; Ruikang Liu; Jin Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Operative Choice for Length-Unstable Femoral Shaft Fracture in School-Aged Children: Locking Plate vs. Monolateral External Fixator.

Authors:  Pan Hong; Saroj Rai; Xin Tang; Ruikang Liu; Jin Li
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.418

8.  Paediatric tibial shaft fractures treated by open reduction and stabilization with monolateral external fixation.

Authors:  A-L Simon; N Apostolou; C Vidal; E Ferrero; K Mazda; B Ilharreborde
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.