Literature DB >> 22467579

Improved estimates of visual field progression using bayesian linear regression to integrate structural information in patients with ocular hypertension.

Richard A Russell1, Rizwan Malik, Balwantray C Chauhan, David P Crabb, David F Garway-Heath.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess whether neuroretinal rim area (RA) measurements of the optic disc could be used to improve the estimate of the rate of change in visual field (VF) mean sensitivity in patients with ocular hypertension (OHT) using a Bayesian linear regression (BLR), compared to a standard ordinary least squares linear regression (OLSLR) of mean sensitivity (MS) measurements alone.
METHODS: MS and RA measurements were analyzed from a longitudinal series of 179 patients with OHT visiting Moorfields Eye Hospital between 1992 and 2000. For each patient, linear regression of RA was computed after an appropriate transformation to "scale" RA with MS measurements, and the slope coefficient from this regression was used as a prior for BLR of MS. The BLR then was compared with the OLSLR approach by evaluating how accurately each regression technique predicted future MS measurements.
RESULTS: On average, BLR was significantly more accurate than OLSLR for series up to 8 measurements long (root-mean-square prediction error [RMSPE] was 0.14 decibels [dB] smaller with BLR than OLSLR; P < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test), with OLSLR of VF data alone being more accurate for longer series (RMSPE was 0.06 dB smaller with OLSLR than BLR).
CONCLUSIONS: BLR provides a significantly more accurate estimate of the rate of change in MS than the standard OLSLR approach, especially in short time series, suggesting that structural measurements can be used successfully in statistical models to assist clinicians monitoring VF progression in patients with OHT. Further studies are necessary to validate the method in glaucoma patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22467579      PMCID: PMC4632869          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-7976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  41 in total

1.  Perimetric defects and ganglion cell damage: interpreting linear relations using a two-stage neural model.

Authors:  William H Swanson; Joost Felius; Fei Pan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies.

Authors:  Paul H Artes; Aiko Iwase; Yuko Ohno; Yoshiaki Kitazawa; Balwantray C Chauhan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Longitudinal changes in the visual field and optic disc in glaucoma.

Authors:  Paul H Artes; Balwantray C Chauhan
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2005-01-24       Impact factor: 21.198

4.  Optic disc and visual field progression in ocular hypertensive subjects: detection rates, specificity, and agreement.

Authors:  Nicholas G Strouthidis; Andrew Scott; Neena M Peter; David F Garway-Heath
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  A Bayesian approach to characterising multi-phase flows using magnetic resonance: application to bubble flows.

Authors:  D J Holland; A Blake; A B Tayler; A J Sederman; L F Gladden
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  A general regression procedure for method transformation. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry, Part III.

Authors:  W Bablok; H Passing; R Bender; B Schneider
Journal:  J Clin Chem Clin Biochem       Date:  1988-11

7.  Test-retest variability of topographic measurements with confocal scanning laser tomography in patients with glaucoma and control subjects.

Authors:  B C Chauhan; R P LeBlanc; T A McCormick; J B Rogers
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Combining structural and functional measurements to improve detection of glaucoma progression using Bayesian hierarchical models.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Mauro T Leite; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Measurement variability in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph imaging of neuroretinal rim area.

Authors:  Victoria M F Owen; Nicholas G Strouthidis; David F Garway-Heath; David P Crabb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 10.  Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma.

Authors:  B C Chauhan; D F Garway-Heath; F J Goñi; L Rossetti; B Bengtsson; A C Viswanathan; A Heijl
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  34 in total

1.  Evaluation of Visual Field and Imaging Outcomes for Glaucoma Clinical Trials (An American Ophthalomological Society Thesis).

Authors:  David F Garway-Heath; Ana Quartilho; Philip Prah; David P Crabb; Qian Cheng; Haogang Zhu
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2017-08-22

2.  What rates of glaucoma progression are clinically significant?

Authors:  Luke J Saunders; Felipe A Medeiros; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill
Journal:  Expert Rev Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-13

3.  Reducing variability in visual field assessment for glaucoma through filtering that combines structural and functional information.

Authors:  Lisha Deng; Shaban Demirel; Stuart K Gardiner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Advances in the Structural Evaluation of Glaucoma with Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Daniel Meira-Freitas; Renato Lisboa; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Curr Ophthalmol Rep       Date:  2013-06-01

5.  Clinical Prediction Performance of Glaucoma Progression Using a 2-Dimensional Continuous-Time Hidden Markov Model with Structural and Functional Measurements.

Authors:  Youngseok Song; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Mengfei Wu; Yu-Ying Liu; Katie A Lucy; Fabio Lavinsky; Mengling Liu; Gadi Wollstein; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 6.  Functional assessment of glaucoma: Uncovering progression.

Authors:  Rongrong Hu; Lyne Racette; Kelly S Chen; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 6.048

7.  Longitudinal Macular Structure-Function Relationships in Glaucoma and Their Sources of Variability.

Authors:  Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Nima Fatehi; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 8.  Combining structure and function to evaluate glaucomatous progression: implications for the design of clinical trials.

Authors:  Renato Lisboa; Robert N Weinreb; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 5.547

Review 9.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in glaucoma clinical trials.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 10.  Macular imaging with optical coherence tomography in glaucoma.

Authors:  Vahid Mohammadzadeh; Nima Fatehi; Adeleh Yarmohammadi; Ji Woong Lee; Farideh Sharifipour; Ramin Daneshvar; Joseph Caprioli; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 6.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.