Literature DB >> 22465609

The complex basis underlying common fragile site instability in cancer.

Efrat Ozeri-Galai1, Assaf C Bester, Batsheva Kerem.   

Abstract

Common fragile sites (CFSs) were characterized almost 30 years ago as sites undergoing genomic instability in cancer. Recently, in vitro studies have found that oncogene-induced replication stress leads to CFS instability. In vivo, CFSs were found to be preferentially unstable during early stages of cancer development and to leave a unique signature of instability. It is now increasingly clear that, along the spectrum of replication features characterizing CFSs, failure of origin activation is a common feature. This and other features of CFSs, together with the replication stress characterizing early stages of cancer development, lead to incomplete replication that results in genomic instability preferentially at CFSs. Here, we review the shared and unique characteristics of CFSs, their underlying causes and their implications, particularly with respect to the development of cancer.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22465609     DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2012.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Genet        ISSN: 0168-9525            Impact factor:   11.639


  45 in total

1.  Rad54 and Mus81 cooperation promotes DNA damage repair and restrains chromosome missegregation.

Authors:  S El Ghamrasni; R Cardoso; L Li; K K N Guturi; V A Bjerregaard; Y Liu; S Venkatesan; M P Hande; J T Henderson; O Sanchez; I D Hickson; A Hakem; R Hakem
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Oncogenes create a unique landscape of fragile sites.

Authors:  Karin Miron; Tamar Golan-Lev; Raz Dvir; Eyal Ben-David; Batsheva Kerem
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  The SNM1B/APOLLO DNA nuclease functions in resolution of replication stress and maintenance of common fragile site stability.

Authors:  Jennifer M Mason; Ishita Das; Martin Arlt; Neil Patel; Stephanie Kraftson; Thomas W Glover; JoAnn M Sekiguchi
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 4.  Chromosome Dynamics during Mitosis.

Authors:  Tatsuya Hirano
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 5.  Early replication fragile sites: where replication-transcription collisions cause genetic instability.

Authors:  Oliver Mortusewicz; Patrick Herr; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 6.  Impediments to replication fork movement: stabilisation, reactivation and genome instability.

Authors:  Sarah Lambert; Antony M Carr
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 7.  Transcription-replication encounters, consequences and genomic instability.

Authors:  Anne Helmrich; Monica Ballarino; Evgeny Nudler; Laszlo Tora
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 8.  Replication fork recovery and regulation of common fragile sites stability.

Authors:  Annapaola Franchitto; Pietro Pichierri
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 9.  DNA replication timing, genome stability and cancer: late and/or delayed DNA replication timing is associated with increased genomic instability.

Authors:  Nathan Donley; Mathew J Thayer
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 15.707

Review 10.  The cellular etiology of chromosome translocations.

Authors:  Vassilis Roukos; Bharat Burman; Tom Misteli
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 8.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.