Literature DB >> 22465192

Temporal/spatial resolution improvement of in vivo DCE-MRI with compressed sensing-optimized FLASH.

SoHyun Han1, Jeffrey L Paulsen, Gang Zhu, Youngkyu Song, SongI Chun, Gyunggoo Cho, Ellen Ackerstaff, Jason A Koutcher, HyungJoon Cho.   

Abstract

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) provides critical information regarding tumor perfusion and permeability by injecting a T(1) contrast agent, such as Gd-DTPA, and making a time-resolved measurement of signal increase. Both temporal and spatial resolutions are required to be high to achieve an accurate and reproducible estimation of tumor perfusion. However, the dynamic nature of the DCE experiment limits simultaneous improvement of temporal and spatial resolution by conventional methods. Compressed sensing (CS) has become an important tool for the acceleration of imaging times in MRI, which is achieved by enabling the reconstruction of subsampled data. Similarly, CS algorithms can be utilized to improve the temporal/spatial resolution of DCE-MRI, and several works describing retrospective simulations have demonstrated the feasibility of such improvements. In this study, the fast low angle shot sequence was modified to implement a Cartesian, CS-optimized, sub-Nyquist phase encoding acquisition/reconstruction with multiple two-dimensional slice selections and was tested on water phantoms and animal tumor models. The mean voxel-level concordance correlation coefficient for Ak(ep) values obtained from ×4 and ×8 accelerated and the fully sampled data was 0.87±0.11 and 0.83±0.11, respectively (n=6), with optimized CS parameters. In this case, the reduction of phase encoding steps made possible by CS reconstruction improved effectively the temporal/spatial resolution of DCE-MRI data using an in vivo animal tumor model (n=6) and may be useful for the investigation of accelerated acquisitions in preclinical and clinical DCE-MRI trials.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22465192      PMCID: PMC3792168          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  23 in total

1.  k-t BLAST and k-t SENSE: dynamic MRI with high frame rate exploiting spatiotemporal correlations.

Authors:  Jeffrey Tsao; Peter Boesiger; Klaas P Pruessmann
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Hans H Schild; Nuschin Morakkabati
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Reconstruction of 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using nonlocal means.

Authors:  Ganesh Adluru; Tolga Tasdizen; Matthias C Schabel; Edward V R DiBella
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.

Authors:  L I Lin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  G-6-PD and PGM phenotypes of 16 continuous human tumor cell lines. Evidence against cross-contamination and contamination by HeLa cells.

Authors:  G Beckman; L Beckman; J Pontén; B Westermark
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 0.444

Review 6.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as an imaging biomarker.

Authors:  Nola Hylton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Reconstruction of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast with temporal constraints.

Authors:  Liyong Chen; Matthias C Schabel; Edward V R DiBella
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 8.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in clinical oncology: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Noninvasive multimodality imaging of the tumor microenvironment: registered dynamic magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography studies of a preclinical tumor model of tumor hypoxia.

Authors:  HyungJoon Cho; Ellen Ackerstaff; Sean Carlin; Mihaela E Lupu; Ya Wang; Asif Rizwan; Joseph O'Donoghue; C Clifton Ling; John L Humm; Pat B Zanzonico; Jason A Koutcher
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 10.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols.

Authors:  P S Tofts; G Brix; D L Buckley; J L Evelhoch; E Henderson; M V Knopp; H B Larsson; T Y Lee; N A Mayr; G J Parker; R E Port; J Taylor; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  11 in total

1.  Atherosclerotic plaque inflammation quantification using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.

Authors:  Huijun Chen; Tingting Wu; William S Kerwin; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2013-12

2.  High spatial and temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography using compressed sensing with magnitude image subtraction.

Authors:  Stanislas Rapacchi; Fei Han; Yutaka Natsuaki; Randall Kroeker; Adam Plotnik; Evan Lehrman; James Sayre; Gerhard Laub; J Paul Finn; Peng Hu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Accelerated Brain DCE-MRI Using Iterative Reconstruction With Total Generalized Variation Penalty for Quantitative Pharmacokinetic Analysis: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Chunhao Wang; Fang-Fang Yin; John P Kirkpatrick; Zheng Chang
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-05-23

4.  Dynamic MR image reconstruction based on total generalized variation and low-rank decomposition.

Authors:  Dong Wang; David S Smith; Xiaoping Yang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  Perfusion MRI: the five most frequently asked technical questions.

Authors:  Marco Essig; Mark S Shiroishi; Thanh Binh Nguyen; Marc Saake; James M Provenzale; David Enterline; Nicoletta Anzalone; Arnd Dörfler; Alex Rovira; Max Wintermark; Meng Law
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Ultrafast Bilateral DCE-MRI of the Breast with Conventional Fourier Sampling: Preliminary Evaluation of Semi-quantitative Analysis.

Authors:  Federico D Pineda; Milica Medved; Shiyang Wang; Xiaobing Fan; David V Schacht; Charlene Sennett; Aytekin Oto; Gillian M Newstead; Hiroyuki Abe; Gregory S Karczmar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 7.  Sparse Reconstruction Techniques in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Methods, Applications, and Challenges to Clinical Adoption.

Authors:  Alice C Yang; Madison Kretzler; Sonja Sudarski; Vikas Gulani; Nicole Seiberlich
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Ultrafast 3D spin-echo acquisition improves Gadolinium-enhanced MRI signal contrast enhancement.

Authors:  S H Han; F H Cho; Y K Song; J Paulsen; Y Q Song; Y R Kim; J K Kim; G Cho; H Cho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Quantitative Evaluation of Temporal Regularizers in Compressed Sensing Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI of the Breast.

Authors:  Dong Wang; Lori R Arlinghaus; Thomas E Yankeelov; Xiaoping Yang; David S Smith
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2017-08-28

10.  Reconstruction of Undersampled Big Dynamic MRI Data Using Non-Convex Low-Rank and Sparsity Constraints.

Authors:  Ryan Wen Liu; Lin Shi; Simon Chun Ho Yu; Naixue Xiong; Defeng Wang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.