PURPOSE: We propose a compressed-sensing (CS) technique based on magnitude image subtraction for high spatial and temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA). METHODS: Our technique integrates the magnitude difference image into the CS reconstruction to promote subtraction sparsity. Fully sampled Cartesian 3D CE-MRA datasets from 6 volunteers were retrospectively under-sampled and three reconstruction strategies were evaluated: k-space subtraction CS, independent CS, and magnitude subtraction CS. The techniques were compared in image quality (vessel delineation, image artifacts, and noise) and image reconstruction error. Our CS technique was further tested on seven volunteers using a prospectively under-sampled CE-MRA sequence. RESULTS: Compared with k-space subtraction and independent CS, our magnitude subtraction CS provides significantly better vessel delineation and less noise at 4× acceleration, and significantly less reconstruction error at 4× and 8× (P < 0.05 for all). On a 1-4 point image quality scale in vessel delineation, our technique scored 3.8 ± 0.4 at 4×, 2.8 ± 0.4 at 8×, and 2.3 ± 0.6 at 12× acceleration. Using our CS sequence at 12× acceleration, we were able to acquire dynamic CE-MRA with higher spatial and temporal resolution than current clinical TWIST protocol while maintaining comparable image quality (2.8 ± 0.5 vs. 3.0 ± 0.4, P = NS). CONCLUSION: Our technique is promising for dynamic CE-MRA.
PURPOSE: We propose a compressed-sensing (CS) technique based on magnitude image subtraction for high spatial and temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA). METHODS: Our technique integrates the magnitude difference image into the CS reconstruction to promote subtraction sparsity. Fully sampled Cartesian 3D CE-MRA datasets from 6 volunteers were retrospectively under-sampled and three reconstruction strategies were evaluated: k-space subtraction CS, independent CS, and magnitude subtraction CS. The techniques were compared in image quality (vessel delineation, image artifacts, and noise) and image reconstruction error. Our CS technique was further tested on seven volunteers using a prospectively under-sampled CE-MRA sequence. RESULTS: Compared with k-space subtraction and independent CS, our magnitude subtraction CS provides significantly better vessel delineation and less noise at 4× acceleration, and significantly less reconstruction error at 4× and 8× (P < 0.05 for all). On a 1-4 point image quality scale in vessel delineation, our technique scored 3.8 ± 0.4 at 4×, 2.8 ± 0.4 at 8×, and 2.3 ± 0.6 at 12× acceleration. Using our CS sequence at 12× acceleration, we were able to acquire dynamic CE-MRA with higher spatial and temporal resolution than current clinical TWIST protocol while maintaining comparable image quality (2.8 ± 0.5 vs. 3.0 ± 0.4, P = NS). CONCLUSION: Our technique is promising for dynamic CE-MRA.
Authors: Kedar Khare; Christopher J Hardy; Kevin F King; Patrick A Turski; Luca Marinelli Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Y Wang; D L Johnston; J F Breen; J Huston; C R Jack; P R Julsrud; M J Kiely; B F King; S L Riederer; R L Ehman Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 1996-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Winfried A Willinek; Dariusch R Hadizadeh; Marcus von Falkenhausen; Horst Urbach; R Hoogeveen; Hans H Schild; Jürgen Gieseke Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Manus J Donahue; Eric Achten; Petrice M Cogswell; Frank-Erik De Leeuw; Colin P Derdeyn; Rick M Dijkhuizen; Audrey P Fan; Rashid Ghaznawi; Jeremy J Heit; M Arfan Ikram; Peter Jezzard; Lori C Jordan; Eric Jouvent; Linda Knutsson; Richard Leigh; David S Liebeskind; Weili Lin; Thomas W Okell; Adnan I Qureshi; Charlotte J Stagg; Matthias Jp van Osch; Peter Cm van Zijl; Jennifer M Watchmaker; Max Wintermark; Ona Wu; Greg Zaharchuk; Jinyuan Zhou; Jeroen Hendrikse Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Animesh Tandon; Nicholas Byrne; Maria de Las Nieves Velasco Forte; Song Zhang; Adrian K Dyer; Jeanne M Dillenbeck; Gerald F Greil; Tarique Hussain Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 2.357