Literature DB >> 23801456

High spatial and temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography using compressed sensing with magnitude image subtraction.

Stanislas Rapacchi1, Fei Han, Yutaka Natsuaki, Randall Kroeker, Adam Plotnik, Evan Lehrman, James Sayre, Gerhard Laub, J Paul Finn, Peng Hu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We propose a compressed-sensing (CS) technique based on magnitude image subtraction for high spatial and temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA).
METHODS: Our technique integrates the magnitude difference image into the CS reconstruction to promote subtraction sparsity. Fully sampled Cartesian 3D CE-MRA datasets from 6 volunteers were retrospectively under-sampled and three reconstruction strategies were evaluated: k-space subtraction CS, independent CS, and magnitude subtraction CS. The techniques were compared in image quality (vessel delineation, image artifacts, and noise) and image reconstruction error. Our CS technique was further tested on seven volunteers using a prospectively under-sampled CE-MRA sequence.
RESULTS: Compared with k-space subtraction and independent CS, our magnitude subtraction CS provides significantly better vessel delineation and less noise at 4× acceleration, and significantly less reconstruction error at 4× and 8× (P < 0.05 for all). On a 1-4 point image quality scale in vessel delineation, our technique scored 3.8 ± 0.4 at 4×, 2.8 ± 0.4 at 8×, and 2.3 ± 0.6 at 12× acceleration. Using our CS sequence at 12× acceleration, we were able to acquire dynamic CE-MRA with higher spatial and temporal resolution than current clinical TWIST protocol while maintaining comparable image quality (2.8 ± 0.5 vs. 3.0 ± 0.4, P = NS).
CONCLUSION: Our technique is promising for dynamic CE-MRA.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DCE-MRI; background suppression; compressed sensing; dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; magnetic resonance angiography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23801456      PMCID: PMC4049415          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  37 in total

1.  Method for rapidly determining and reconstructing the peak arterial frame from a time-resolved CE-MRA exam.

Authors:  T J Carroll; F R Korosec; J S Swan; T M Grist; R Frayne; C A Mistretta
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Parallel imaging reconstruction using automatic regularization.

Authors:  Fa-Hsuan Lin; Kenneth K Kwong; John W Belliveau; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Accelerated MR imaging using compressive sensing with no free parameters.

Authors:  Kedar Khare; Christopher J Hardy; Kevin F King; Patrick A Turski; Luca Marinelli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Reconstruction of 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using nonlocal means.

Authors:  Ganesh Adluru; Tolga Tasdizen; Matthias C Schabel; Edward V R DiBella
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Array compression for MRI with large coil arrays.

Authors:  Martin Buehrer; Klaas P Pruessmann; Peter Boesiger; Sebastian Kozerke
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Improved k-t BLAST and k-t SENSE using FOCUSS.

Authors:  Hong Jung; Jong Chul Ye; Eung Yeop Kim
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  k-t PCA: temporally constrained k-t BLAST reconstruction using principal component analysis.

Authors:  Henrik Pedersen; Sebastian Kozerke; Steffen Ringgaard; Kay Nehrke; Won Yong Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Low-dose, time-resolved, contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography in cardiac and vascular diseases: correlation to high spatial resolution 3D contrast-enhanced MRA.

Authors:  M S Krishnam; A Tomasian; D G Lohan; L Tran; J P Finn; S G Ruehm
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.350

9.  Dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using contrast enhancement, fast data acquisition, and complex subtraction.

Authors:  Y Wang; D L Johnston; J F Breen; J Huston; C R Jack; P R Julsrud; M J Kiely; B F King; S L Riederer; R L Ehman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  4D time-resolved MR angiography with keyhole (4D-TRAK): more than 60 times accelerated MRA using a combination of CENTRA, keyhole, and SENSE at 3.0T.

Authors:  Winfried A Willinek; Dariusch R Hadizadeh; Marcus von Falkenhausen; Horst Urbach; R Hoogeveen; Hans H Schild; Jürgen Gieseke
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Compressed sensing MRI: a review of the clinical literature.

Authors:  Oren N Jaspan; Roman Fleysher; Michael L Lipton
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Undersampling patterns in k-space for compressed sensing MRI using two-dimensional Cartesian sampling.

Authors:  Shinya Kojima; Hiroyuki Shinohara; Takeyuki Hashimoto; Shigeru Suzuki
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-08-04

3.  Accelerated noncontrast-enhanced 4-dimensional intracranial MR angiography using golden-angle stack-of-stars trajectory and compressed sensing with magnitude subtraction.

Authors:  Ziwu Zhou; Fei Han; Songlin Yu; Dandan Yu; Stanislas Rapacchi; Hee Kwon Song; Danny J J Wang; Peng Hu; Lirong Yan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-05-07       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Consensus statement on current and emerging methods for the diagnosis and evaluation of cerebrovascular disease.

Authors:  Manus J Donahue; Eric Achten; Petrice M Cogswell; Frank-Erik De Leeuw; Colin P Derdeyn; Rick M Dijkhuizen; Audrey P Fan; Rashid Ghaznawi; Jeremy J Heit; M Arfan Ikram; Peter Jezzard; Lori C Jordan; Eric Jouvent; Linda Knutsson; Richard Leigh; David S Liebeskind; Weili Lin; Thomas W Okell; Adnan I Qureshi; Charlotte J Stagg; Matthias Jp van Osch; Peter Cm van Zijl; Jennifer M Watchmaker; Max Wintermark; Ona Wu; Greg Zaharchuk; Jinyuan Zhou; Jeroen Hendrikse
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Use of a semi-automated cardiac segmentation tool improves reproducibility and speed of segmentation of contaminated right heart magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Animesh Tandon; Nicholas Byrne; Maria de Las Nieves Velasco Forte; Song Zhang; Adrian K Dyer; Jeanne M Dillenbeck; Gerald F Greil; Tarique Hussain
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Accelerated ferumoxytol-enhanced 4D multiphase, steady-state imaging with contrast enhancement (MUSIC) cardiovascular MRI: validation in pediatric congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Ziwu Zhou; Fei Han; Stanislas Rapacchi; Kim-Lien Nguyen; Daniel Z Brunengraber; Grace-Hyun J Kim; J Paul Finn; Peng Hu
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 7.  Clinical utility of optimized three-dimensional T1-, T2-, and T2*-weighted sequences in spinal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Nobuko Tanitame; Keizo Tanitame; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.374

8.  3D Cartesian MRI with compressed sensing and variable view sharing using complementary poisson-disc sampling.

Authors:  Evan Levine; Bruce Daniel; Shreyas Vasanawala; Brian Hargreaves; Manojkumar Saranathan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Segmented golden ratio radial reordering with variable temporal resolution for dynamic cardiac MRI.

Authors:  Fei Han; Ziwu Zhou; Stanislas Rapacchi; Kim-Lien Nguyen; J Paul Finn; Peng Hu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  Sparse Reconstruction Techniques in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Methods, Applications, and Challenges to Clinical Adoption.

Authors:  Alice C Yang; Madison Kretzler; Sonja Sudarski; Vikas Gulani; Nicole Seiberlich
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.