Literature DB >> 22464874

Results that matter: structured vs. unstructured self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes.

Christopher G Parkin1, Ann Buskirk, Deborah A Hinnen, Matthias Axel-Schweitzer.   

Abstract

Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is one component of diabetes management. SMBG presents information about current glycemic status and provides the ability to obtain immediate feedback regarding the impact of behavioral and pharmacological interventions on glucose levels. However, SMBG is useful only when the glucose information is understood correctly, data are accurately interpreted, and results prompt appropriate therapeutic actions. The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) recently published guidelines for SMBG use in non-insulin treated people with diabetes, recommending that SMBG should be used only when patients and/or their clinicians possess the ability and willingness to incorporate SMBG monitoring and therapy adjustment into their diabetes care plan. If SMBG is used, the IDF also recommends that structured SMBG be performed utilizing defined regimens to meet individual needs. Structured SMBG can be performed as daily glucose profiles that are representative of daily glucose excursions. Measuring preprandial/postprandial blood glucose (bG) levels on consecutive or alternating days ("testing in pairs") also provides impactful glucose information for daily diabetes management. This article reviews recent studies that appropriately utilized structured SMBG as an integral component of comprehensive diabetes management and discusses how their findings support the IDF recommendations. Our goal is to help clinicians make more informed decisions about the value and utility of SMBG in diabetes management.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22464874     DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract        ISSN: 0168-8227            Impact factor:   5.602


  18 in total

1.  6(th) Annual Symposium on Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) applications and beyond, April 25-27, 2013, Riga, Latvia.

Authors:  Aus Alzaid; Christof Schlaeger; Rolf Hinzmann
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Use of structured self-monitoring of blood glucose improves glycemic control in real-world clinical practice: findings from a multinational and retrospectively controlled trial.

Authors:  Nebojsa Lalić; Tsvetalina Tankova; Mallem Nourredine; Christopher Parkin; Ulrich Schweppe; Ildiko Amann-Zalan
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-01-01

3.  The Impact of Structured Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Combined With Intensive Education on HbA1c Levels, Hospitalizations, and Quality-of-Life Parameters in Insulin-Treated Patients With Diabetes at Primary Care in Serbia: The Multicenter SPA-EDU Study.

Authors:  Nebojša M Lalić; Katarina Lalić; Aleksandra Jotić; Dejan Stanojević; Dragana Živojinović; Andrija Janićijević; Christopher Parkin
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-12-25

4.  Effects of Structured Versus Unstructured Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose on Glucose Control in Patients With Non-insulin-treated Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Edoardo Mannucci; Alessandro Antenore; Francesco Giorgino; Marina Scavini
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-07-12

Review 5.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose in diabetes: from evidence to clinical reality in Central and Eastern Europe--recommendations from the international Central-Eastern European expert group.

Authors:  Leszek Czupryniak; László Barkai; Svetlana Bolgarska; Agata Bronisz; Jan Broz; Katarzyna Cypryk; Marek Honka; Andrej Janez; Mladen Krnic; Nebojsa Lalic; Emil Martinka; Dario Rahelic; Gabriela Roman; Tsvetalina Tankova; Tamás Várkonyi; Bogumił Wolnik; Nadia Zherdova
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 6.  Impact of behavioral interventions in the management of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Daniel J Cox; Ann Gill Taylor; Elizabeth S Dunning; Mary C Winston; Ingrid L Luk Van; Anthony McCall; Harsimran Singh; William S Yancy
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.810

7.  Safe and Efficacious Use of Automated Bolus Advisors in Individuals Treated With Multiple Daily Insulin Injection (MDI) Therapy: Lessons Learned From the Automated Bolus Advisor Control and Usability Study (ABACUS).

Authors:  Christopher G Parkin; Katharine Barnard; Deborah A Hinnen
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-03-20

8.  Penny wise and pound foolish: will shortsighted cost reduction measures compromise patient access to promising self-monitoring of blood glucose technology?

Authors:  Christopher G Parkin
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-01

9.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose: use, frequency drivers, and cost in Argentina.

Authors:  Jorge F Elgart; Lorena González; Enzo Rucci; Juan J Gagliardino
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-09-10

10.  Changes in A1C levels are significantly associated with changes in levels of the cardiovascular risk biomarker hs-CRP: results from the SteP study.

Authors:  Oliver Schnell; Ildiko Amann-Zalan; Zhihong Jelsovsky; Annette Moritz; Justo L Bermejo; Christopher G Parkin; Matthias A Schweitzer; Lawrence Fisher; William H Polonsky
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.