Literature DB >> 22461165

Pulsed electromagnetic fields and low intensity pulsed ultrasound in bone tissue.

Leo Massari1, Gaetano Caruso, Vincenzo Sollazzo, Stefania Setti.   

Abstract

The use of physical stimuli to modulate osteogenetic response and favour fracture healing has been the subject of research for many years now. Currently, 78% of hospitals in the USA provide this treatment at 3 months from the trauma.In literature, the findings of many clinical studies agree in confirming that biophysical stimuli are able to lead to healing in 75-85% of patients with nonunions. Prospective, randomized and double-blind studies show that by employing biophysical stimuli the time needed for a fresh fracture to heal can be reduced "on average" by 25-38%. The treatment is suggested for healing of fresh fractures that are characterized as "risk fractures", fractures that can evolve in nonunions and that amount to 20% of all the fractures; this justifies the use of biophysical stimuli, with a favourable cost-benefit ratio.Current orthopaedics reviews the different modalities of biophysical treatment in search of solutions most adequate to the pathology, the characteristics of the fracture and those of the patient. It is up to the orthopaedist to assess whether the biomechanical conditions of stability of the fracture site are such as not to jeopardize the osteogenetic process. International clinical experience shows that success in biophysical therapy for bone regeneration depends on certain principal factors: suitable indication, efficacy of the device employed, method of stimulation and - of crucial importance - patient compliance. If these principles are kept in mind, the percentage of success of union, obtained with biophysical stimulation, exceeds 90%.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 22461165      PMCID: PMC2781224     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab        ISSN: 1724-8914


  39 in total

1.  Signal transduction in electrically stimulated bone cells.

Authors:  C T Brighton; W Wang; R Seldes; G Zhang; S R Pollack
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Stimulation of growth factor synthesis by electric and electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  Roy K Aaron; Barbara D Boyan; Deborah McK Ciombor; Zvi Schwartz; Bruce J Simon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  The role of electrical stimulation in bone repair.

Authors:  Deborah McK Ciombor; Roy K Aaron
Journal:  Foot Ankle Clin       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.653

4.  Health plans' coverage determinations for technology-based interventions: the case of electrical bone growth stimulation.

Authors:  Alison J Huang; Marcel P Gemperli; Linda Bergthold; Sara S Singer; Alan Garber
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Augmentation of bone repair by inductively coupled electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  C A Bassett; R J Pawluk; A A Pilla
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-05-03       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Acceleration of tibial fracture-healing by non-invasive, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound.

Authors:  J D Heckman; J P Ryaby; J McCabe; J J Frey; R F Kilcoyne
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Pulsating electromagnetic field stimulates mRNA expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and -4.

Authors:  M Nagai; M Ota
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  No effect of low-intensity ultrasound on healing time of intramedullary fixed tibial fractures.

Authors:  A Emami; M Petrén-Mallmin; S Larsson
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Electrical stimulation induces the level of TGF-beta1 mRNA in osteoblastic cells by a mechanism involving calcium/calmodulin pathway.

Authors:  H Zhuang; W Wang; R M Seldes; A D Tahernia; H Fan; C T Brighton
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1997-08-18       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  Effects of BMP-2 and pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) on rat primary osteoblastic cell proliferation and gene expression.

Authors:  Nagarajan Selvamurugan; Sukyee Kwok; Anatoliy Vasilov; Stephen C Jefcoat; Nicola C Partridge
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  11 in total

1.  Effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on the biological behaviors of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on titanium with different surface topographies.

Authors:  Yanxin An; Yan Song; Zhaoling Wang; Jing Wang; Gaoyi Wu; Guoxiong Zhu; Lei Chen
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  The management of sacral stress fractures: current concepts.

Authors:  Valentina Longhino; Cristina Bonora; Valerio Sansone
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2011-09

3.  Magnetic exposure using Samarium Cobalt (SmCO5) increased proliferation and stemness of human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells (hUC-MSCs).

Authors:  Haslinda Abdul Hamid; Rajesh Ramasamy; Mohd Kamarulzaki Mustafa; Vahid Hosseinpour Sarmadi; Azizi Miskon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  The effect of two phosphodiesterase inhibitors on bone healing in mandibular fractures (animal study in rats).

Authors:  Mohsen MalekiGorji; Arash Golestaneh; Seyyed Mohammad Razavi
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-08-31

5.  Comparative effects of systemic administration of levofloxacin and cephalexin on fracture healing in rats.

Authors:  Shayan Golestani; Arash Golestaneh; Atousa Aminzadeh Gohari
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-04-30

6.  Effects of pulsed 2.856 GHz microwave exposure on BM-MSCs isolated from C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Changzhen Wang; Xiaoyan Wang; Hongmei Zhou; Guofu Dong; Xue Guan; Lifeng Wang; Xinping Xu; Shuiming Wang; Peng Chen; Ruiyun Peng; Xiangjun Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of Electromagnetic Stimulation on Gene Expression of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Repair of Bone Lesions.

Authors:  Maryam Jazayeri; Mohammad Ali Shokrgozar; Nooshin Haghighipour; Bahram Bolouri; Fereshteh Mirahmadi; Mehdi Farokhi
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 2.479

8.  Pentoxifylline and electromagnetic field improved bone fracture healing in rats.

Authors:  Yusuf Atalay; Nedim Gunes; Mehmet Dervis Guner; Veysi Akpolat; Mustafa Salih Celik; Rezzan Guner
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.162

9.  A comparative analysis of the in vitro effects of pulsed electromagnetic field treatment on osteogenic differentiation of two different mesenchymal cell lineages.

Authors:  Gabriele Ceccarelli; Nora Bloise; Melissa Mantelli; Giulia Gastaldi; Lorenzo Fassina; Maria Gabriella Cusella De Angelis; Davide Ferrari; Marcello Imbriani; Livia Visai
Journal:  Biores Open Access       Date:  2013-08

Review 10.  The Use of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields to Promote Bone Responses to Biomaterials In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Carlo Galli; Giuseppe Pedrazzi; Monica Mattioli-Belmonte; Stefano Guizzardi
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2018-09-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.