Literature DB >> 10342350

No effect of low-intensity ultrasound on healing time of intramedullary fixed tibial fractures.

A Emami1, M Petrén-Mallmin, S Larsson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether stimulation with low-intensity ultrasound will reduce the radiologic healing time of fresh tibial shaft fractures fixed with a reamed and statically locked intramedullary rod.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double blinded, and placebo controlled. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two adult patients were included, fifteen in the active ultrasound group and seventeen in the placebo group. They all used an ultrasound device twenty minutes daily for seventy-five days without knowing whether it was active or inactive. Standardized radiographs were taken every third week until healing and at six and twelve months. All radiographs were assessed blinded and independently by a radiologist and an orthopaedic surgeon. The codes were not broken until all fractures had healed and all radiographs had been evaluated.
RESULTS: The time until the first visible callus averaged 40+/-3 days for the active group and 37+/-3 days for the placebo (p=0.44). The healing time, defined as radiologic bridging of three cortices, was on average 155+/-22 days (median 113 days) for the active treatment group and 125+/-11 days (median 112 days) for the placebo group (p=0.76) as assessed by the radiologist and 128+/-13 days for the active group and 114+/-9 days for the placebo group (p=0.40) as evaluated by the orthopaedic surgeon.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that low-intensity ultrasound treatment did not shorten healing time in fresh tibial fractures treated with a reamed and statically locked intramedullary nail. Our results are not in accordance with previous findings reporting reduced healing time in nonoperatively treated tibial shaft fractures when subjected to ultrasound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10342350     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199905000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  21 in total

1.  [Abstracts of the 58th Annual Meeting of the North German Orthopedic Society. June 18-20, 2009. Hamburg, Germany].

Authors: 
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Ultrasound and shockwave therapy for acute fractures in adults.

Authors:  Xavier L Griffin; Nick Parsons; Matthew L Costa; David Metcalfe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-06-23

3.  Value of ultrasonography for observation of early healing of humeral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Hai-Qing Su; Xiao-Qiang Zhuang; Yu Bai; Hai-Hong Ye; Xiao-Hua Huang; Bing-Bing Lu; Sheng-Lin Lu; De-Yi Nong; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 1.314

4.  A not-so-systematic review.

Authors:  Peter Heeckt; Hans Goost; Sheldon S Lin; Todd O McKinley; Samir Mehta; Yuko Mikuni-Takagaki
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 5.  Low-intensity pulsed ultrasonography versus electrical stimulation for fracture healing: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shanil Ebrahim; Brent Mollon; Sheena Bance; Jason W Busse; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Pulsed electromagnetic fields and low intensity pulsed ultrasound in bone tissue.

Authors:  Leo Massari; Gaetano Caruso; Vincenzo Sollazzo; Stefania Setti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2009-05

Review 7.  The effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy on time to fracture healing: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jason W Busse; Mohit Bhandari; Abhaya V Kulkarni; Eldon Tunks
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  Variability in the assessment of fracture-healing in orthopaedic trauma studies.

Authors:  Luis A Corrales; Saam Morshed; Mohit Bhandari; Theodore Miclau
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and pulsed electromagnetic field in the treatment of tibial fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicol A Walker; Craig R Denegar; Jody Preische
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound: Fracture healing.

Authors:  Raman Mundi; Stephen Petis; Roopinder Kaloty; Vijay Shetty; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.