Literature DB >> 22459747

Changes in baroreceptor sensitivity after eversion carotid endarterectomy.

Serdar Demirel1, Nicolas Attigah, Hans Bruijnen, Laura Macek, Maani Hakimi, Thomas Able, Dittmar Böckler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Posteversion carotid endarterectomy hypertension has been suggested to be associated with impaired baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS), which has been identified as a factor of prognostic relevance in patients with cardiovascular disease. The aim of this prospective single-center nonrandomized study was to describe the changes of BRS in the early postoperative period after eversion carotid endarterectomy (E-CEA).
METHODS: Spontaneous BRS and hemodynamic parameters such as blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), and total peripheral resistance (TPR) were evaluated preoperatively as well as postoperatively after 1 and 3 days using a noninvasive sequential cross-correlation method. Additionally, any modification in vasoactive medication due to BP derangement in the postoperative period was noted. Due to non-normal distribution of BRS, HR, and TPR samples, all measured values were expressed as medians with interquartile range (IQR), and a nonparametric test (Friedman) was performed. After adjustment for multiple testing, differences were considered statistically significant when the two-tailed P value was less than .0036.
RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (mean age, 71 years) with symptomatic or asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis were included. The BRS significantly decreased to a lower level 24 hours after surgery (4.71 ms/mm Hg [3.02-6.1]) than preoperatively (5.95 ms/mm Hg [4.68-10.86]; P < .0001), resulting in a within-patient difference of -2.46 ms/mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI], -8.38 - -1.52). This difference (95% CI, [- 1.58 (-8.24 - -0.80)]) persisted at the 72-hour measurements (5.63 ms/mm Hg [3.23-7.69]; P = .0005). The HR, reflecting the sympathetic activity, increased 24 hours after the operation (69 bpm [61.3-77.7]) compared with preoperative values (63 bpm [57.9-73.2]; P = .005) (within-patient difference [95% CI] 3.7 [1.5-8.5]), and this increase reached significance at 72 hours (69 bpm [65.4-77.5]; P = .001) (within-patient difference [95% CI] 5.5 [2.3-8.8]). Values of systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, mean arterial pressure, CO, and TPR were not significantly different between pre- and postoperative measurements. Overall, 23 (66%) patients developed significant postoperative hypertension requiring aggressive management with additional medications.
CONCLUSIONS: E-CEA might have a decreasing influence on BRS, leading to increased sympathetic activity. Investigations of the longer-term effects of impaired BRS are warranted. These findings should be interpreted with caution, noting the limitation of an absent control group.
Copyright © 2012 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22459747     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.11.134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  6 in total

Review 1.  Hemodynamic changes and baroreflex sensitivity associated with carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Qinqin Cao; Jun Zhang; Gelin Xu
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2015-01

Review 2.  [Postoperative blood pressure alterations after carotid endarterectomy : Implications of different reconstruction methods].

Authors:  J A Celi de la Torre; D A Skrypnik; R A Vinogradov; D Böckler; S Demirel
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Perioperative blood pressure alterations after eversion and conventional carotid endarterectomy sustain in the midterm.

Authors:  Serdar Demirel; Nicolas Attigah; Hans Bruijnen; Maani Hakimi; Benedikta Burgmer; Dittmar Böckler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Does severe contralateral carotid artery stenosis affect the outcomes of carotid endarterectomy?

Authors:  Serkan Burç Deser; Mustafa Kemal Demirağ; Fersat Kolbakır
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 0.332

5.  Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy according to the Anesthetic Method: General versus Regional Anesthesia.

Authors:  Jong Won Kim; Up Huh; Seunghwan Song; Sang Min Sung; Jung Min Hong; Areum Cho
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-12-05

6.  Peri-operative Monitoring of an Asystolic Cardiac Arrest Requiring Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation During Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Joris J Blok; Floortje Huizing; Arthur G Y Kurvers; Katja K Muderlak; Alexander C de Vries
Journal:  EJVES Vasc Forum       Date:  2021-04-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.