Literature DB >> 32082825

Does severe contralateral carotid artery stenosis affect the outcomes of carotid endarterectomy?

Serkan Burç Deser1, Mustafa Kemal Demirağ1, Fersat Kolbakır1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the effect of contralateral internal carotid artery stenosis on postoperative stroke and mortality rate and blood pressure alterations following carotid artery endarterectomy.
METHODS: Between January 2009 and April 2017, a total of 152 carotid artery endarterectomy operations in 141 consecutive patients (30 females, 111 males; mean age 70.0±10.2 years; range, 48 to 92 years) with internal carotid artery stenosis were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups as those with contralateral internal carotid artery stenosis <70% (n=95) and contralateral internal carotid artery stenosis ?70% (n=26). Stroke and mortality rates in the early postoperative period (within the first 30 days), postoperative blood pressure alterations at six and 24 hours, non-neurological outcomes, and baseline demographic characteristics were analyzed and compared between the groups.
RESULTS: Both groups showed similar results in terms of the demographic characteristics. There was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative blood pressure alterations at six (p=0.917) and 24 hours (p=0.6), stroke rate (7.6% vs. 3.1%, p=0.282), mortality rate (3.8% vs. 2.1%, p=0.519), non-neurological complications (15.3% vs. 11.4%, p=0.736), and length of hospital stay (p>0.05) between the groups. The patients with contralateral severe internal carotid artery stenosis were younger (p=0.005).
CONCLUSION: The present study shows that the presence of a contralateral severe internal carotid artery stenosis does not increase the risk of postoperative stroke and mortality rates and blood pressure alterations. Therefore, carotid artery endarterectomy can be performed with acceptable complication rates in patients with contralateral severe internal carotid artery stenosis with strict perioperative hemodynamic monitoring.
Copyright © 2019, Turkish League Against Rheumatism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood pressure; carotid endarterectomy; contralateral carotid artery stenosis; stroke

Year:  2019        PMID: 32082825      PMCID: PMC7021377          DOI: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2019.15878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg        ISSN: 1301-5680            Impact factor:   0.332


  22 in total

1.  Predictors of neurocognitive decline after carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  J Mocco; David A Wilson; Ricardo J Komotar; Joseph Zurica; William J Mack; Hadi J Halazun; Raheleh Hatami; Robert R Sciacca; E Sander Connolly; Eric J Heyer
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST): stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for carotid disease.

Authors:  Vito A Mantese; Carlos H Timaran; David Chiu; Richard J Begg; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  The influence of contralateral occlusion on results of carotid interventions from the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Registry.

Authors:  Joseph J Ricotta; Gilbert R Upchurch; Gregg S Landis; Christopher T Kenwood; Flora S Siami; Nikolaos Tsilimparis; John J Ricotta; Rodney A White
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  [The analysis of risk factors and outcomes of carotid endarterectomy for carotid artery stenosis].

Authors:  Z G Chen; Y J Li; Y P Diao; R Sun; Y H Zheng; C W Liu; Y X Chen
Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2017-09-26

5.  Outcome following carotid endarterectomy: lessons learned from a large international vascular registry.

Authors:  G Menyhei; M Björck; B Beiles; E Halbakken; L P Jensen; T Lees; D Palombo; I A Thomson; M Venermo; P Wigger
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 7.069

6.  The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial : surgical results in 1415 patients.

Authors:  G G Ferguson; M Eliasziw; H W Barr; G P Clagett; R W Barnes; M C Wallace; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; J W Finan; V C Hachinski; H J Barnett
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 7.  Carotid endarterectomy in patients with contralateral carotid occlusion.

Authors:  Caron Rockman
Journal:  Semin Vasc Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jörg Ederle; Joanna Dobson; Roland L Featherstone; Leo H Bonati; H Bart van der Worp; Gert J de Borst; T Hauw Lo; Peter Gaines; Paul J Dorman; Sumaira Macdonald; Philippe A Lyrer; Johanna M Hendriks; Charles McCollum; Paul J Nederkoorn; Martin M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

Authors:  H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Risk factors for perioperative death and stroke after carotid endarterectomy: results of the new york carotid artery surgery study.

Authors:  Ethan A Halm; Stanley Tuhrim; Jason J Wang; Caron Rockman; Thomas S Riles; Mark R Chassin
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of 3D printed carotid anatomical models in planning carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Hakan Göçer; Ahmet Barış Durukan; Osman Tunç; Erdinç Naseri; Ertuğrul Ercan
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 0.332

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.