Literature DB >> 25999987

Hemodynamic changes and baroreflex sensitivity associated with carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting.

Qinqin Cao1, Jun Zhang1, Gelin Xu1.   

Abstract

Atherosclerotic carotid lesion is a major cause of stroke which accounts for up to 20% of ischemic stroke. Aggressive treatment of carotid stenosis may prevent stroke. Currently, carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) are the first-line treatments for severe carotid stenosis. CEA is superior to medical therapy in preventing stroke and cardiovascular death. CAS has emerged as an alternative to CEA in recent years due to its less invasive nature. However, both CEA and CAS may be associated with adverse hemodynamic changes as well as a variation of carotid baroreflex sensitivity. There is no consensus on which of these two methods is more advantageous concerning the procedure-related hemodynamic changes. This article reviews the hemodynamic changes and baroreflex sensitivity after CEA and CAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Baroreflex sensitivity; Carotid artery stenting; Carotid endarterectomy; Hemodynamic changes

Year:  2015        PMID: 25999987      PMCID: PMC4436525          DOI: 10.1159/000366231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Neurol        ISSN: 1664-5545


  64 in total

1.  Carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy have different effects on heart rate variability.

Authors:  Mehmet Demirci; Okay Saribaş; Kayihan Uluç; Saruhan Cekirge; Erkmen Böke; Hakan Ay
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 3.181

2.  Noninvasive investigation of autonomic activity after carotid stenting or carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Leïla Yakhou; Isabelle Constant; Jean-Claude Merle; Dominique Laude; Jean-Pierre Becquemin; Philippe Duvaldestin
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 3.  Baroreflex sensitivity: measurement and clinical implications.

Authors:  Maria Teresa La Rovere; Gian Domenico Pinna; Grzegorz Raczak
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Evaluation of reproducibility of spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity at rest and during laboratory tests.

Authors:  F Iellamo; J M Legramante; G Raimondi; F Castrucci; M Massaro; G Peruzzi
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.844

5.  The effects of carotid endarterectomy on the mechanical properties of the carotid sinus and carotid sinus nerve activity in atherosclerotic patients.

Authors:  J E Angell-James; J S Lumley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Effect of age and high blood pressure on baroreflex sensitivity in man.

Authors:  B Gribbin; T G Pickering; P Sleight; R Peto
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  Selective contribution of two types of carotid sinus baroreceptors to the control of blood pressure.

Authors:  J L Seagard; F A Hopp; H A Drummond; D M Van Wynsberghe
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 17.367

8.  Baroreceptor reflex sensitivity index derived from Phase 4 of te Valsalva maneuver.

Authors:  H A Palmero; T F Caeiro; D J Iosa; J Bas
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1981 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Organization and transmitter specificity of medullary neurons activated by sustained hypertension: implications for understanding baroreceptor reflex circuitry.

Authors:  R K Chan; P E Sawchenko
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Assessment of baroreflex sensitivity in patients with preserved and impaired left ventricular function by means of the Valsalva manoeuvre and the phenylephrine test.

Authors:  G Raczak; G D Pinna; R Maestri; G Swiatecka
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.124

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  [Postoperative blood pressure alterations after carotid endarterectomy : Implications of different reconstruction methods].

Authors:  J A Celi de la Torre; D A Skrypnik; R A Vinogradov; D Böckler; S Demirel
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Efficacy and safety of stenting for elderly patients with severe and symptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a critical meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yi-An Ouyang; Yugang Jiang; Mengqiang Yu; Yunze Zhang; Hao Huang
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.458

3.  Rare Complication of Carotid Stenting: New-Onset Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Study of Five Patients.

Authors:  Narayan D Deshmukh; Rakeshsingh K Singh; Rakesh S Lalla; Anil P Karapurkar; Satish V Khadilkar
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.383

Review 4.  Recanalization of the Chronically Occluded Internal Carotid Artery: Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Mario Zanaty; Jorge A Roa; Pascal M Jabbour; Edgar A Samaniego; David M Hasan
Journal:  World Neurosurg X       Date:  2019-11-21

5.  Incidence of postoperative, major, adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A single-center, retrospective study.

Authors:  Aphichat Suphathamwit; Chutima Leewatchararoongjaroen; Pongprueth Rujirachun; Kittipatr Poopong; Apichaya Leesakul; Apichaya Junyavoraluk; Chanean Ruangsetakit
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2022-01-08

Review 6.  Impact of Non-Pharmacological Interventions on the Mechanisms of Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Daniela Matei; Ioana Buculei; Catalina Luca; Calin-Petru Corciova; Doru Andritoi; Robert Fuior; Daniel-Andrei Iordan; Ilie Onu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 6.208

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.