Literature DB >> 22459346

Diagnostic accuracy of visual urethral mobility exam versus Q-Tip test: a randomized crossover trial.

Barbara Lynn Robinson1, Elizabeth Joanne Geller, Brent Ashley Parnell, Andrea Kuntaraf Crane, Mary Lee Jannelli, Ellen Casper Wells, AnnaMarie Connolly, Catherine Ann Matthews.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of a visual urethral mobility examination (VUME) with a Q-Tip test in the assessment of urethral hypermobility. STUDY
DESIGN: Subjects were randomized to a VUME or Q-Tip test first, followed by the alternate assessment. Outcomes included hypermobile, not hypermobile, or indeterminate. Hypermobility was defined as 30° or greater from the horizontal. Pain perception and test preference were assessed.
RESULTS: For the 54 subjects, 61.1% demonstrated hypermobility on VUME vs 72.2% on the Q-Tip test (P = .39). Assessment of hypermobility was correlated between the 2 tools (ρ = 0.47, P = .001). Positive and negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity for VUME were 88%, 56%, 78%, and 71%, respectively, with a Q-Tip test as the reference standard. Mean pain score on visual analog scale was 0.72 for VUME and 3.15 for Q-tip test (P < .001). VUME was preferred by 83% of subjects.
CONCLUSION: VUME is a diagnostic alternative to the Q-Tip test for the assessment of urethral hypermobility and is preferred by subjects.
Copyright © 2012 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22459346     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

Review 1.  Measuring outcomes in urogynecological surgery: "perspective is everything".

Authors:  Candace Y Parker-Autry; Matthew D Barber; Kimberly Kenton; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Vaginal Swab Test Compared With the Urethral Q-tip Test for Urethral Mobility Measurement: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Isuzu Meyer; Jeff M Szychowski; Jana D Illston; Alison M Parden; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  The pathophysiology of stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kobra Falah-Hassani; Joanna Reeves; Rahman Shiri; Duane Hickling; Linda McLean
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 1.932

4.  Clinical and Urodynamic Predictors of the Q-Tip Test in Women With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.

Authors:  Chin-Jui Wu; Wan-Hua Ting; Ho-Hsiung Lin; Sheng-Mou Hsiao
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  Inverse correlation between urethral length and continence before and after native tissue pelvic floor reconstruction.

Authors:  A R Mothes; H K Mothes; A Kather; A Altendorf-Hofmann; M P Radosa; J C Radosa; I B Runnebaum
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The Urological Society of India survey on urinary incontinence practice patterns among urologists.

Authors:  Sanjay Sinha; Shirish Yande; Anita Patel; Ajit Vaze; Kalyan Sarkar; Shailesh Raina; Mayank Mohan Agarwal; Pawan Vasudeva; Nikhil Khattar; Vijay Kumar Sarma Madduri; Nagendranath Mishra; Amita Jain; Manu Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.