Literature DB >> 22930213

Measuring outcomes in urogynecological surgery: "perspective is everything".

Candace Y Parker-Autry1, Matthew D Barber, Kimberly Kenton, Holly E Richter.   

Abstract

Over 10 years have passed since the first US National Institutes of Health consensus panel considered the standardization of definitions of pelvic floor conditions and the criteria utilized for reporting pelvic floor research study outcomes. The literature is replete with pelvic floor outcome studies; however, a consistent standardized approach to the evaluation of patients and characterization of outcomes is still needed. The purpose of this overview is to describe how the use of outcome measures has evolved over time and to attempt to help readers utilize the best measures for their clinical and research needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22930213      PMCID: PMC3678959          DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1908-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  52 in total

1.  Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  T H Rockwood; J M Church; J W Fleshman; R L Kane; C Mavrantonis; A G Thorson; S D Wexner; D Bliss; A C Lowry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index.

Authors:  T H Rockwood; J M Church; J W Fleshman; R L Kane; C Mavrantonis; A G Thorson; S D Wexner; D Bliss; A C Lowry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 3.  Etiology and management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  J M Jorge; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 4.  Surgery for genuine stress incontinence.

Authors:  G J Jarvis
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1994-05

Review 5.  Pad testing in incontinent women: a review.

Authors:  A M Ryhammer; J C Djurhuus; S Laurberg
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1999

6.  A new instrument to measure sexual function in women with urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  R G Rogers; D Kammerer-Doak; A Villarreal; K Coates; C Qualls
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system.

Authors:  A F Hall; J P Theofrastous; G W Cundiff; R L Harris; L F Hamilton; S E Swift; R C Bump
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  The effectiveness of surgery for stress incontinence in women: a systematic review.

Authors:  N A Black; S H Downs
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1996-10

9.  Validation of a severity index in female urinary incontinence and its implementation in an epidemiological survey.

Authors:  H Sandvik; S Hunskaar; A Seim; R Hermstad; A Vanvik; H Bratt
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group.

Authors:  J S Uebersax; J F Wyman; S A Shumaker; D K McClish; J A Fantl
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.696

View more
  6 in total

1.  Cumulative Incidence of a Subsequent Surgery After Stress Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Procedure.

Authors:  Jennifer M Wu; Alexis A Dieter; Virginia Pate; Michele Jonsson Funk
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  International Urogynecology Consultation: Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROs) use in the evaluation of patients with pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Sara Cichowski; Magdalena Emilia Grzybowska; Gabriela E Halder; Sierra Jansen; Daniela Gold; Montserrat Espuña; Swati Jha; Ahmed Al-Badr; Abdelmageed Abdelrahman; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 1.932

3.  Conceptual framework for patient-important treatment outcomes for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Vivian W Sung; Rebecca G Rogers; Matthew D Barber; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.696

4.  Vaginal prolapse repair with or without a midurethral sling in women with genital prolapse and occult stress urinary incontinence: a randomized trial.

Authors:  J Marinus van der Ploeg; Katrien Oude Rengerink; Annemarie van der Steen; Jules H Schagen van Leeuwen; C Huub van der Vaart; Jan-Paul W R Roovers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  The "bother" of urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Gerda Trutnovsky; Daniela Ulrich; Rodrigo Guzman Rojas; Kristy Mann; Thomas Aigmueller; Hans P Dietz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Patient-reported goal attainment and comprehensive functioning outcomes after surgery compared with pessary for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Vivian W Sung; Kyle J Wohlrab; Annetta Madsen; Christina Raker
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 8.661

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.