Kobra Falah-Hassani1, Joanna Reeves1, Rahman Shiri2, Duane Hickling3,4, Linda McLean5. 1. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. 2. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland. 3. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada. 4. Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada. 5. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. linda.mclean@uottawa.ca.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the evidence for pathologies underlying stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women. METHODS: For the data sources, a structured search of the peer-reviewed literature (English language; 1960-April 2020) was conducted using predefined key terms in PubMed and Embase. Google Scholar was also searched. Peer-reviewed manuscripts that reported on anatomical, physiological or functional differences between females with signs and/or symptoms consistent with SUI and a concurrently recruited control group of continent females without any substantive urogynecological symptoms. Of 4629 publications screened, 84 met the inclusion criteria and were retained, among which 24 were included in meta-analyses. RESULTS: Selection bias was moderate to high; < 25% of studies controlled for major confounding variables for SUI (e.g., age, BMI and parity). There was a lack of standardization of methods among studies, and several measurement issues were identified. Results were synthesized qualitatively, and, where possible, random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. Deficits in urethral and bladder neck structure and support, neuromuscular and mechanical function of the striated urethral sphincter (SUS) and levator ani muscles all appear to be associated with SUI. Meta-analyses showed that observed bladder neck dilation and lower functional urethral length, bladder neck support and maximum urethral closure pressures are strong characteristic signs of SUI. CONCLUSION: The pathology of SUI is multifactorial, with strong evidence pointing to bladder neck and urethral incompetence. While there is also evidence of impaired urethral support and levator ani function, standardized approaches to measurement are needed to generate higher levels of evidence.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the evidence for pathologies underlying stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women. METHODS: For the data sources, a structured search of the peer-reviewed literature (English language; 1960-April 2020) was conducted using predefined key terms in PubMed and Embase. Google Scholar was also searched. Peer-reviewed manuscripts that reported on anatomical, physiological or functional differences between females with signs and/or symptoms consistent with SUI and a concurrently recruited control group of continent females without any substantive urogynecological symptoms. Of 4629 publications screened, 84 met the inclusion criteria and were retained, among which 24 were included in meta-analyses. RESULTS: Selection bias was moderate to high; < 25% of studies controlled for major confounding variables for SUI (e.g., age, BMI and parity). There was a lack of standardization of methods among studies, and several measurement issues were identified. Results were synthesized qualitatively, and, where possible, random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. Deficits in urethral and bladder neck structure and support, neuromuscular and mechanical function of the striated urethral sphincter (SUS) and levator ani muscles all appear to be associated with SUI. Meta-analyses showed that observed bladder neck dilation and lower functional urethral length, bladder neck support and maximum urethral closure pressures are strong characteristic signs of SUI. CONCLUSION: The pathology of SUI is multifactorial, with strong evidence pointing to bladder neck and urethral incompetence. While there is also evidence of impaired urethral support and levator ani function, standardized approaches to measurement are needed to generate higher levels of evidence.
Authors: Carlos D'Ancona; Bernard Haylen; Matthias Oelke; Luis Abranches-Monteiro; Edwin Arnold; Howard Goldman; Rizwan Hamid; Yukio Homma; Tom Marcelissen; Kevin Rademakers; Alexis Schizas; Ajay Singla; Irela Soto; Vincent Tse; Stefan de Wachter; Sender Herschorn Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Erik Schick; Jocelyne Tessier; Pierre E Bertrand; Charles Dupont; Martine Jolivet-Tremblay Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2003 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Margarita Martínez-Gómez; Mario I Romero-Ortega; Ana G Hernandez-Reynoso; Dora L Corona-Quintanilla; Kenia López-García; Ana A Horbovetz; Francisco Castelán; Philippe Zimmern Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-05-19 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Wilke M Post; Joanna Widomska; Hilde Grens; Marieke J H Coenen; Frank M J Martens; Dick A W Janssen; Joanna IntHout; Geert Poelmans; Egbert Oosterwijk; Kirsten B Kluivers Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-03-21 Impact factor: 5.923