Literature DB >> 22457402

Image quality associated with the use of an MR-compatible incubator in neonatal neuroimaging.

K O'Regan1, P Filan, N Pandit, M Maher, N Fanning.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: MRI in the neonate poses significant challenges associated with patient transport and monitoring, and the potential for diminished image quality owing to patient motion. The objective of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of a dedicated MR-compatible incubator with integrated radiofrequency coils in improving image quality of MRI studies of the brain acquired in term and preterm neonates using standard MRI equipment.
METHODS: Subjective and objective analyses of image quality of neonatal brain MR examinations were performed before and after the introduction of an MR-compatible incubator. For all studies, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated, image quality was graded (1-3) and each was assessed for image artefact (e.g. motion). Student's t-test and the Mann-Whitney U-test were used to compare mean SNR values.
RESULTS: 39 patients were included [mean gestational age 39 weeks (range 30-42 weeks); mean postnatal age 13 days (range 1-56 days); mean weight 3.5 kg (range 1.4-4.5 kg)]. Following the introduction of the MR-compatible incubator, diagnostic quality scans increased from 50 to 89% and motion artefact decreased from 73 to 44% of studies. SNR did not increase initially, but, when using MR sequences and parameters specifically tailored for neonatal brain imaging, SNR increased from 70 to 213 (p=0.001).
CONCLUSION: Use of an MR-compatible incubator in neonatal neuroimaging provides a safe environment for MRI of the neonate and also facilitates patient monitoring and transport. When specifically tailored MR protocols are used, this results in improved image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22457402      PMCID: PMC3486674          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/66148265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  12 in total

1.  Brain metabolite composition during early human brain development as measured by quantitative in vivo 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  R Kreis; L Hofmann; B Kuhlmann; C Boesch; E Bossi; P S Hüppi
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging of the neonate in a magnetic resonance-compatible incubator with a built-in coil.

Authors:  Elspeth H Whitby; Paul D Griffiths; Torsten Lonneker-Lammers; Ravi Srinivasan; Daniel J A Connolly; David Capener; Martyn N J Paley
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging of the brain.

Authors:  A Ba-Ssalamaha; S Schick; K Heimberger; K F Linnau; N Schibany; R Prokesch; S Trattnig
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Visual processing in infants and children studied using functional MRI.

Authors:  E Martin; P Joeri; T Loenneker; D Ekatodramis; D Vitacco; J Hennig; V L Marcar
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.756

5.  Sedation and monitoring of paediatric patients undergoing open low-field MRI.

Authors:  T Rupprecht; R Kuth; B Bowing; S Gerling; M Wagner; W Rascher
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.299

6.  Proton spectroscopy and diffusion imaging on the first day of life after perinatal asphyxia: preliminary report.

Authors:  A J Barkovich; K D Westmark; H S Bedi; J C Partridge; D M Ferriero; D B Vigneron
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Anaesthesia for MRI in the paediatric patient.

Authors:  Gianpaolo Serafini; Nicola Zadra
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.706

8.  Administration of oral chloral hydrate to paediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  C L Ronchera; L Martí-Bonmatí; C Poyatos; J Vilar; N V Jiménez
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1992-12-11

9.  An audit of adverse events in children sedated with chloral hydrate or propofol during imaging studies.

Authors:  C Merola; C Albarracin; P Lebowitz; R S Bienkowski; S M Barst
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.556

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance imaging in perinatal brain injury: clinical presentation, lesions and outcome.

Authors:  Mary Rutherford; Latha Srinivasan; Leigh Dyet; Phil Ward; Joanna Allsop; Serena Counsell; Frances Cowan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-05-16
View more
  10 in total

1.  [Application of magnetic resonance imaging-compatible incubator in cranial magnetic resonance imaging for neonates: a multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial].

Authors:  Lian Liu; Peng Zhang; Hong-Ping Xia; Bin Wang; Xue-Ling Ma; Guo-Qiang Cheng; Yuan Shi
Journal:  Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-12

Review 2.  The challenges of neonatal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Owen J Arthurs; Andrea Edwards; Topun Austin; Martin J Graves; David J Lomas
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-08-11

3.  Comparison of preterm and term equivalent age MRI for the evaluation of preterm brain injury.

Authors:  A Malhotra; M C Fahey; M Davies-Tuck; F Wong; E Carse; G Whiteley; M Ditchfield
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Non-pharmacological strategies to obtain usable magnetic resonance images in non-sedated infants: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elisa R Torres; Tyler A Tumey; Douglas C Dean; Wondwosen Kassahun-Yimer; Eloise D Lopez-Lambert; Mary E Hitchcock
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 5.837

5.  Evaluation of 100 brain examinations using a 3 Tesla MR-compatible incubator-safety, handling, and image quality.

Authors:  Selma Sirin; Sophia L Goericke; Britta M Huening; Anja Stein; Sonja Kinner; Ursula Felderhoff-Mueser; Bernd Schweiger
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  PPREMO: a prospective cohort study of preterm infant brain structure and function to predict neurodevelopmental outcome.

Authors:  Joanne M George; Roslyn N Boyd; Paul B Colditz; Stephen E Rose; Kerstin Pannek; Jurgen Fripp; Barbara E Lingwood; Melissa M Lai; Annice H T Kong; Robert S Ware; Alan Coulthard; Christine M Finn; Sasaka E Bandaranayake
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.125

7.  First Experience with Neonatal Examinations with the Use of MR-Compatible Incubator.

Authors:  Monika Bekiesińska-Figatowska; Sylwia Szkudlińska-Pawlak; Anna Romaniuk-Doroszewska; Marek Duczkowski; Beata Iwanowska; Agnieszka Duczkowska; Jarosław Mądzik; Hanna Brągoszewska
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-18

8.  Association Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Anesthetized Children and Hypothermia.

Authors:  Jessica A Cronin; Christine Shen; Sohel Rana; Stanley Thomas Fricke; Andrew Matisoff
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2019-05-23

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging of neonates in the magnetic resonance compatible incubator.

Authors:  Monika Bekiesińska-Figatowska; Ewa Helwich; Magdalena Rutkowska; Joanna Stankiewicz; Iwona Terczyńska
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 10.  Neuroimaging at Term Equivalent Age: Is There Value for the Preterm Infant? A Narrative Summary.

Authors:  Rudaina Banihani; Judy Seesahai; Elizabeth Asztalos; Paige Terrien Church
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.