Literature DB >> 22453780

Anatomical and histological examination of the porcine vagina and supportive structures: in search of an ideal model for pelvic floor disorder evaluation and management.

Daniel D Gruber1, William B Warner, Eric D Lombardini, Christopher M Zahn, Jerome L Buller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: : The objective of the study was to examine the anatomy and histology of the swine vagina and adjacent supportive structures in comparison to human tissues to determine the potential utility of this model for pelvic floor disorder evaluation and management.
METHODS: : This is a descriptive study of the gross anatomy and histology of the swine vagina, uterosacral ligament, cardinal ligament, and rectovaginal space. Tissue was collected from 6 different sites in each of the 6 animals, processed, and stained with hematoxylin-eosin, Masson trichrome, and van Gieson and evaluated by both gynecologic and veterinary pathologists.
RESULTS: : Porcine tissues were similar to the human vagina and supporting structures. The origin, insertion, and course of the uterosacral and cardinal ligaments appeared similar to those in humans. Histologically, both the porcine and human vagina and rectum consist of a mucosal, muscular, and adventitial layers. The swine vaginal smooth muscle is arranged in an inner circular and outer longitudinal manner. Collagen, elastin, and smooth muscle were identified in 5 sites. Collagen was highest in the cardinal compared with the uterosacral ligament (P = 0.03), whereas elastin was highest in the uterosacral ligament. The vaginal epithelium measured approximately 40 μm at the vaginal cuff and 50 to 200 μm at anterior and posterior vagina. The swine vagina appeared thinner and contained less elastin. The rectovaginal region contained a smooth muscle layer leading to a thin adventitial layer.
CONCLUSIONS: : The swine vagina and adjacent supportive structures appear to be grossly and histologically similar to human vaginal anatomy, and these similarities could lead to further investigation of the porcine model in the study of pelvic support and support disorders.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22453780     DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e318214b1a6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 2151-8378            Impact factor:   2.091


  8 in total

1.  Ultrasonic thermal damage during robotic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Jason Massengill; Eric Lombardini; Jonathan Oliva; Jerome Buller; Daniel Gruber
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-04-27

2.  Animal models of female pelvic organ prolapse: lessons learned.

Authors:  Bruna M Couri; Andrew T Lenis; Ali Borazjani; Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Margot S Damaser
Journal:  Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-05-01

3.  Mechanical Analysis of the Uterosacral Ligament: Swine vs. Human.

Authors:  Adwoa Baah-Dwomoh; Marianna Alperin; Mark Cook; Raffaella De Vita
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Vaginal wall weakness in parous ewes: a potential preclinical model of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Natharnia Young; Anna Rosamilia; John Arkwright; Joseph Lee; Miranda Davies-Tuck; Joan Melendez; Jerome Werkmeister; Caroline E Gargett
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Smooth Muscle Organization and Nerves in the Rat Vagina: A First Look Using Tissue Clearing and Immunolabeling.

Authors:  Alyssa J Huntington; Barath Udayasuryan; Pang Du; Scott S Verbridge; Steven D Abramowitch; Raffaella De Vita
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 6.  Mechanics of Uterosacral Ligaments: Current Knowledge, Existing Gaps, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Kandace Donaldson; Alyssa Huntington; Raffaella De Vita
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Temporal analysis of vaginal proteome reveals developmental changes in lower reproductive tract of gilts across the first two weeks postnatal.

Authors:  KaLynn Harlow; Aridany Suarez-Trujillo; Victoria Hedrick; Tiago Sobreira; Uma K Aryal; Kara Stewart; Theresa Casey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A biomechanical analysis of different meshes for reconstructions of the pelvic floor in the porcine model.

Authors:  Nadja Trageser; Axel Sauerwald; Sebastian Ludwig; Wolfram Malter; Kilian Wegmann; Leonidas Karapanos; Julia Radosa; Alina Katharina Jansen; Christian Eichler
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.344

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.