Natharnia Young1,2, Anna Rosamilia1,2,3, John Arkwright4, Joseph Lee2, Miranda Davies-Tuck1,3, Joan Melendez2, Jerome Werkmeister3,5, Caroline E Gargett6,7. 1. The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, 27-31 Wright Street, Clayton, Victoria, Australia, 3168. 2. Monash Health, Pelvic Floor Clinic, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Victoria, Australia, 3168. 4. Computer Science, Engineering, and Mathematics, Flinders University, Clovelly Park, South Australia, 5082, Australia. 5. CSIRO Manufacturing, Bayview Avenue, Clayton, Victoria, Australia, 3168. 6. The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, 27-31 Wright Street, Clayton, Victoria, Australia, 3168. caroline.gargett@hudson.org.au. 7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Victoria, Australia, 3168. caroline.gargett@hudson.org.au.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Ewes develop pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and may be a suitable model for preclinical studies evaluating cell-based therapies for POP. The aim of this study was to establish a clinical score of vaginal weakness and to compare POP Quantification System (POP-Q) values in conscious nulliparous and parous ewes and determine whether ewes are a suitable POP model. METHODS: Ewes (n = 114) were examined while conscious, without sedation, and standing in a V conveyer by adapting the human POP-Q measurement. Ovine POP was defined as descent to the introitus from POP-Q points Aa 3 cm above the introitus on the anterior wall, Ap 3 cm above the introitus on the posterior wall, or increased Ba anterior wall descent above the urethra (≥0). A test-retest showed good inter- and intrarater reliability. RESULTS: There was no evidence of tissue mobility at Aa, Ap, Ba (all -3 cm) in nulliparous ewes (n = 14). In contrast, multiparous ewes had a median of -1 and interquartile range (IQR) (-2 to 0) for Aa, [0 (-1 to 0)] for Ap and [0 (-2.75 to 0)] for Ba (n = 33; P < 0.0001 in comparison with nulliparous) ewes. Ovine vaginal displacement was seen in 50.9 % of parous ewes and was strongly associated with parity (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: A modified POP-Q in conscious ewes was established showing that the vaginal wall of parous animals has similar regions of weakness as do women and may be similarly related to parity. Ewes appear to be a representative preclinical model of human vaginal prolapse.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Ewes develop pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and may be a suitable model for preclinical studies evaluating cell-based therapies for POP. The aim of this study was to establish a clinical score of vaginal weakness and to compare POP Quantification System (POP-Q) values in conscious nulliparous and parous ewes and determine whether ewes are a suitable POP model. METHODS: Ewes (n = 114) were examined while conscious, without sedation, and standing in a V conveyer by adapting the human POP-Q measurement. Ovine POP was defined as descent to the introitus from POP-Q points Aa 3 cm above the introitus on the anterior wall, Ap 3 cm above the introitus on the posterior wall, or increased Ba anterior wall descent above the urethra (≥0). A test-retest showed good inter- and intrarater reliability. RESULTS: There was no evidence of tissue mobility at Aa, Ap, Ba (all -3 cm) in nulliparous ewes (n = 14). In contrast, multiparous ewes had a median of -1 and interquartile range (IQR) (-2 to 0) for Aa, [0 (-1 to 0)] for Ap and [0 (-2.75 to 0)] for Ba (n = 33; P < 0.0001 in comparison with nulliparous) ewes. Ovine vaginal displacement was seen in 50.9 % of parous ewes and was strongly associated with parity (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: A modified POP-Q in conscious ewes was established showing that the vaginal wall of parous animals has similar regions of weakness as do women and may be similarly related to parity. Ewes appear to be a representative preclinical model of human vaginal prolapse.
Entities:
Keywords:
Ovine model; POP-Q; Pelvic organ prolapse; Vagina
Authors: R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Mariëlla I Withagen; Mark E Vierhout; Jan C Hendriks; Kirsten B Kluivers; Alfredo L Milani Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Lisa M Pierce; Melissa A Grunlan; Yaping Hou; Shannon S Baumann; Thomas J Kuehl; Tristi W Muir Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2009-03-14 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Daniela Ulrich; Sharon L Edwards; Kai Su; Jacinta F White; John A M Ramshaw; Graham Jenkin; Jan Deprest; Anna Rosamilia; Jerome A Werkmeister; Caroline E Gargett Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jan A Deprest; Rufus Cartwright; Hans Peter Dietz; Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito; Marianne Koch; Kristina Allen-Brady; Jittima Manonai; Adi Y Weintraub; John W F Chua; Romana Cuffolo; Felice Sorrentino; Laura Cattani; Judith Decoene; Anne-Sophie Page; Natalie Weeg; Glaucia M Varella Pereira; Marina Gabriela M C Mori da Cunha de Carvalho; Katerina Mackova; Lucie Hajkova Hympanova; Pamela Moalli; Oksana Shynlova; Marianna Alperin; Maria Augusta T Bortolini Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2022-03-10 Impact factor: 1.932
Authors: B Aghaei-Ghareh-Bolagh; S Mukherjee; K M Lockley; S M Mithieux; Z Wang; S Emmerson; S Darzi; C E Gargett; A S Weiss Journal: Mater Today Bio Date: 2020-10-13
Authors: Stuart Emmerson; Natharnia Young; Anna Rosamilia; Luke Parkinson; Sharon L Edwards; Aditya V Vashi; Miranda Davies-Tuck; Jacinta White; Kirstin Elgass; Camden Lo; John Arkwright; Jerome A Werkmeister; Caroline E Gargett Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-04-04 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Chantal M Diedrich; Zeliha Guler; Lucie Hympanova; Eva Vodegel; Manuel Zündel; Edoardo Mazza; Jan Deprest; Jan Paul Roovers Journal: BJOG Date: 2021-12-29 Impact factor: 7.331
Authors: Marina Gabriela M C Mori da Cunha; Katerina Mackova; Lucie Hajkova Hympanova; Maria Augusta T Bortolini; Jan Deprest Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2021-01-23 Impact factor: 2.894