Literature DB >> 22452557

The context-object-manipulation triad: cross talk during action perception revealed by fMRI.

Moritz F Wurm1, D Yves Cramon, Ricarda I Schubotz.   

Abstract

To recognize an action, an observer exploits information about the applied manipulation, the involved objects, and the context where the action occurs. Context, object, and manipulation information are hence expected to be tightly coupled in a triadic relationship (the COM triad hereafter). The current fMRI study investigated the hemodynamic signatures of reciprocal modulation in the COM triad. Participants watched short video clips of pantomime actions, that is, actions performed with inappropriate objects, taking place at compatible or incompatible contexts. The usage of pantomime actions enabled the disentanglement of the neural substrates of context-manipulation (CM) and context-object (CO) associations. There were trials in which (1) both manipulation and objects, (2) only manipulation, (3) only objects, or (4) neither manipulation nor objects were compatible with the context. CM compatibility effects were found in an action-related network comprising ventral premotor cortex, SMA, left anterior intraparietal sulcus, and bilateral occipito-temporal cortex. Conversely, CO compatibility effects were found bilaterally in lateral occipital complex. These effects interacted in subregions of the lateral occipital complex. An overlap of CM and CO effects was observed in the occipito-temporal cortex and the dorsal attention network, that is, superior frontal sulcus/dorsal premotor cortex and superior parietal lobe. Results indicate that contextual information is integrated into the analysis of actions. Manipulation and object information is linked by contextual associations as a function of co-occurrence in specific contexts. Activation of either CM or CO associations shifts attention to either action- or object-related relevant information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22452557     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  10 in total

1.  The neural correlates of planning and executing actual tool use.

Authors:  Marie-Luise Brandi; Afra Wohlschläger; Christian Sorg; Joachim Hermsdörfer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  What's she doing in the kitchen? Context helps when actions are hard to recognize.

Authors:  Moritz F Wurm; Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

3.  Social-affective features drive human representations of observed actions.

Authors:  Diana C Dima; Tyler M Tomita; Christopher J Honey; Leyla Isik
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 8.713

4.  Visual context modulates potentiation of grasp types during semantic object categorization.

Authors:  Solène Kalénine; Allison D Shapiro; Andrea Flumini; Anna M Borghi; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-06

5.  People accurately predict the transition probabilities between actions.

Authors:  Mark A Thornton; Diana I Tamir
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 6.  The tool in the brain: apraxia in ADL. Behavioral and neurological correlates of apraxia in daily living.

Authors:  Marta M N Bieńkiewicz; Marie-Luise Brandi; Georg Goldenberg; Charmayne M L Hughes; Joachim Hermsdörfer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-04-23

7.  How the context matters. Literal and figurative meaning in the embodied language paradigm.

Authors:  Valentina Cuccio; Marianna Ambrosecchia; Francesca Ferri; Marco Carapezza; Franco Lo Piparo; Leonardo Fogassi; Vittorio Gallese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Using enriched semantic event chains to model human action prediction based on (minimal) spatial information.

Authors:  Fatemeh Ziaeetabar; Jennifer Pomp; Stefan Pfeiffer; Nadiya El-Sourani; Ricarda I Schubotz; Minija Tamosiunaite; Florentin Wörgötter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Expertise in action observation: recent neuroimaging findings and future perspectives.

Authors:  Luca Turella; Moritz F Wurm; Raffaele Tucciarelli; Angelika Lingnau
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  N400 ERPs for actions: building meaning in context.

Authors:  Lucía Amoruso; Carlos Gelormini; Francisco Aboitiz; Miguel Alvarez González; Facundo Manes; Juan F Cardona; Agustín Ibanez
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.