Literature DB >> 33370343

Using enriched semantic event chains to model human action prediction based on (minimal) spatial information.

Fatemeh Ziaeetabar1, Jennifer Pomp2, Stefan Pfeiffer1, Nadiya El-Sourani2, Ricarda I Schubotz2, Minija Tamosiunaite1,3, Florentin Wörgötter1.   

Abstract

Predicting other people's upcoming action is key to successful social interactions. Previous studies have started to disentangle the various sources of information that action observers exploit, including objects, movements, contextual cues and features regarding the acting person's identity. We here focus on the role of static and dynamic inter-object spatial relations that change during an action. We designed a virtual reality setup and tested recognition speed for ten different manipulation actions. Importantly, all objects had been abstracted by emulating them with cubes such that participants could not infer an action using object information. Instead, participants had to rely only on the limited information that comes from the changes in the spatial relations between the cubes. In spite of these constraints, participants were able to predict actions in, on average, less than 64% of the action's duration. Furthermore, we employed a computational model, the so-called enriched Semantic Event Chain (eSEC), which incorporates the information of different types of spatial relations: (a) objects' touching/untouching, (b) static spatial relations between objects and (c) dynamic spatial relations between objects during an action. Assuming the eSEC as an underlying model, we show, using information theoretical analysis, that humans mostly rely on a mixed-cue strategy when predicting actions. Machine-based action prediction is able to produce faster decisions based on individual cues. We argue that human strategy, though slower, may be particularly beneficial for prediction of natural and more complex actions with more variable or partial sources of information. Our findings contribute to the understanding of how individuals afford inferring observed actions' goals even before full goal accomplishment, and may open new avenues for building robots for conflict-free human-robot cooperation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33370343      PMCID: PMC7769489          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  24 in total

1.  The fraction of an action is more than a movement: neural signatures of event segmentation in fMRI.

Authors:  Ricarda I Schubotz; Franziska M Korb; Anne-Marike Schiffer; Waltraud Stadler; D Yves von Cramon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Segmentation in the perception and memory of events.

Authors:  Christopher A Kurby; Jeffrey M Zacks
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 3.  Vision, eye movements, and natural behavior.

Authors:  Michael F Land
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 3.241

4.  Squeezing lemons in the bathroom: contextual information modulates action recognition.

Authors:  Moritz F Wurm; Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Predicting goals in action episodes attenuates BOLD response in inferior frontal and occipitotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Moritz F Wurm; Mari Hrkać; Yuka Morikawa; Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Predictive Impact of Contextual Objects during Action Observation: Evidence from Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Nadiya El-Sourani; Ima Trempler; Moritz F Wurm; Gereon R Fink; Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Movement kinematics affect action prediction: comparing human to non-human point-light actions.

Authors:  Waltraud Stadler; Anne Springer; Jim Parkinson; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-03-13

8.  ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain.

Authors:  Svenja Caspers; Karl Zilles; Angela R Laird; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Multiple grasp-specific representations of tool dynamics mediate skillful manipulation.

Authors:  James N Ingram; Ian S Howard; J Randall Flanagan; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Understanding the Goals of Everyday Instrumental Actions Is Primarily Linked to Object, Not Motor-Kinematic, Information: Evidence from fMRI.

Authors:  Toby Nicholson; Matt Roser; Patric Bach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Social Robot in Rehabilitation and Assistance: What Is the Future?

Authors:  Daniele Giansanti
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.