Literature DB >> 2245180

The influence of tumour cell DNA content on survival in colorectal cancer: a detailed analysis.

N C Armitage1, K C Ballantyne, D F Evans, P Clarke, J Sheffield, J D Hardcastle.   

Abstract

We have investigated the influence of tumour cell DNA content (ploidy) on survival of 416 patients undergoing excisional surgery for colorectal cancer. Two hundred and eleven (51%) tumours had an abnormal DNA content (aneuploid or tetraploid). There was no correlation between ploidy status, sex, age and pathological stage, histological grade, tumour site, local tumour extension or assessment of curability. Patients with tumours with an abnormal DNA content had a poorer survival 68/211 (32%) than patients with near normal (diploid) DNA content 88/205 (43%) (test statistic 5.0, P = 0.02). The patient subgroups in which DNA content exerted an influence on survival were: stage B tumours (P = 0.0058), moderately differentiated tumours (P = 0.004), rectal tumours (P = 0.02), and mobile tumours (P = 0.02). Multivariant analysis showed that pathological stage, local tumour extension and DNA ploidy were all independent prognostic indicators whereas histological grade, tumour site and assessment of 'curability' were not. The influence of pathological stage, however, was much greater than that of local tumor extension or DNA ploidy. Tumour cell DNA content together with pathological stage and local tumour extension may be used in a prognostic index and may be important in planning adjuvant therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2245180      PMCID: PMC1971514          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1990.393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  19 in total

1.  The prognostic significance of direct extension of carcinoma of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  V B ASTLER; F A COLLER
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1954-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Clinical importance of DNA content in rectal cancer measured by flow cytometry.

Authors:  J R Jass; K Mukawa; H S Goh; S B Love; D Capellaro
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  The influence of tumour cell DNA abnormalities on survival in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  N C Armitage; R A Robins; D F Evans; D R Turner; R W Baldwin; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  DNA distribution in human colon carcinomas and its relationship to clinical behavior.

Authors:  R C Wolley; K Schreiber; L G Koss; M Karas; A Sherman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Method for analysis of cellular DNA content of paraffin-embedded pathological material using flow cytometry.

Authors:  D W Hedley; M L Friedlander; I W Taylor; C A Rugg; E A Musgrove
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.479

6.  The results of 1115 patients with colorectal cancer treated over an 8-year period in a single hospital.

Authors:  M J Stower; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 4.424

7.  Prognostic significance of DNA aneuploidy and cell proliferation in rectal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  P Quirke; M F Dixon; A D Clayden; P Durdey; J E Dyson; N S Williams; C C Bird
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 7.996

8.  Large bowel cancer: surgical pathology and its relationship to survival.

Authors:  R K Phillips; R Hittinger; L Blesovsky; J S Fry; L P Fielding
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  DNA stemline heterogeneity in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  W Hiddemann; D B Von Bassewitz; H J Kleinemeier; E Schulte-Brochterbeck; J Hauss; B Lingemann; T Büchner; E Grundmann
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Heterogeneity of colorectal adenocarcinomas evaluated by flow cytometry and histopathology.

Authors:  P Quirke; J E Dyson; M F Dixon; C C Bird; C A Joslin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  7 in total

1.  The prognostic significance of DNA ploidy in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  M Sarbia; G Molsberger; R Willers; O Horstmann; C Schroders; R Porschen; E Gabbert H
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Numerical chromosome alterations in colorectal carcinomas detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Relationship to 17p and 18q allelic losses.

Authors:  A Ooi; C D Huang; M Mai; I Nakanishi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Influence of preoperative radiotherapy on DNA ploidy in squamous cell carcinomas of the oesophagus.

Authors:  R Porschen; G Bevers; U Remy; S Schauseil; F Borchard
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Stage-specific frequency and prognostic significance of aneuploidy in patients with sporadic colorectal cancer--a meta-analysis and current overview.

Authors:  Tilman Laubert; Sandra Freitag-Wolf; Michael Linnebacher; Alexandra König; Brigitte Vollmar; Jens K Habermann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Significance of superoxide dismutase (SOD) in human colorectal cancer tissue: correlation with malignant intensity.

Authors:  A Satomi; S Murakami; T Hashimoto; K Ishida; M Matsuki; M Sonoda
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 7.527

6.  DNA index and S phase fraction in uveal malignant melanomas.

Authors:  W G Hodge; A J Duclos; G Rocha; E Antecka; M G Baines; C Corriveau; S Brownstein; J Deschenes
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Flow cytometric analysis of ploidy in colorectal cancer: a multicentric experience.

Authors:  R Silvestrini; I D'Agnano; A Faranda; A Costa; G Zupi; M Cosimelli; V Quagliuolo; D Giannarelli; L Gennari; R Cavaliere
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.