Literature DB >> 6743980

Large bowel cancer: surgical pathology and its relationship to survival.

R K Phillips, R Hittinger, L Blesovsky, J S Fry, L P Fielding.   

Abstract

Modifications of Dukes' (1932) classification of rectal tumours have led to confusion. From the data of 2518 patients who had undergone curative colorectal surgery the interrelationships between tumour penetration, grade, vascular invasion and pattern of lymph node involvement have been examined and their individual relevance to survival determined. Subdivision of Dukes' A cases into those confined to the muscularis mucosae (A) and those penetrating into, but not through, the bowel wall (B1) should be abandoned. Despite interrelationships between lymph node status, grade of tumour and vascular invasion, they all contribute prognostic information independent of each other. Apical lymph node involvement, more than four lymph nodes involved and extensive primary tumours with nodal involvement all carry a bad prognosis. Although interrelated each variable is individually relevant. However, subgroups of patients with Dukes' C tumours have an observed survival significantly better than expected. When few lymph nodes are involved or the primary tumour is confined to the bowel wall but lymph nodes are involved, the expectation of life is equivalent to Dukes' B.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6743980     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800710813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  21 in total

1.  Molecular staging estimates occult tumor burden in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Alex Mejia; Stephanie Schulz; Terry Hyslop; David S Weinberg; Scott A Waldman
Journal:  Adv Clin Chem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 5.394

2.  Controversial topics in surgery: Splenic flexure mobilisation for anterior resection performed for sigmoid and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Robin Kennedy; Ian Jenkins; Paul J Finan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Venous invasion as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Tsuchiya; Y Ando; Y Kikuchi; M Kanazawa; H Sato; R Abe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 4.  Molecular staging individualizing cancer management.

Authors:  Alex Mejia; Stephanie Schulz; Terry Hyslop; David S Weinberg; Scott A Waldman
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Carcinoma of the colon: long-term survival and prognosis after surgical treatment in a series of 798 patients.

Authors:  J Moreaux; M Catala
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Large bowel cancer: the effect of perioperative blood transfusion on outcome.

Authors:  S Cheslyn-Curtis; L P Fielding; R Hittinger; J S Fry; R K Phillips
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Access to care and satisfaction in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Porter; Karen M Inglis; Lori A Wood; Paul J Veugelers
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Follow-up recommendations for colon cancer.

Authors:  W Donald Buie; Jo-Anne P Attard
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-08

Review 9.  Trends in cancer survival and mortality rates.

Authors:  J Pontén; H O Adami; P Sparén
Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother       Date:  1991

10.  Prognostic factors in 1,138 Iranian colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Bijan Moghimi-Dehkordi; Azadeh Safaee; Mohammad Reza Zali
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.