Literature DB >> 22451236

Impact of interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and TME for locally advanced rectal cancer on pathologic response and oncologic outcome.

Albert M Wolthuis1, Freddy Penninckx, Karin Haustermans, Gert De Hertogh, Steffen Fieuws, Eric Van Cutsem, André D'Hoore.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for rectal cancer has arbitrarily been set at 6-8 weeks. However, tumor regression is variable. This study aimed to evaluate whether the interval between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery had an impact on pathologic response and on surgical and oncologic outcome.
METHODS: A total of 356 consecutive patients with clinical stage II and III rectal adenocarcinoma were identified. Median age was 63 years, and 65 % were men. All patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (45 Gy) with a continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil. Data on neoadjuvant-surgery interval, type of surgery, pathology, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, disease recurrence, and survival were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the interval between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery: ≤ 7 weeks (short interval, n = 201) and >7 weeks (long interval, n = 155).
RESULTS: The complete pathologic response rate was 21 %. It was significantly higher after a longer interval (28 %) than after a shorter interval (16 %, p = 0.006). A longer interval did not affect morbidity or length of hospital stay. After a median follow-up of 4.9 years, the 5-year cancer-specific survival rate was 83 % in the short-interval group versus 91 % in the long-interval group (p = 0.046), and the free-from-recurrence rate was 73 versus 83 %, respectively (p = 0.026).
CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis, there seems to be an association between a longer interval after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and complete pathologic response without affecting postoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay, and with no detrimental effect on oncologic outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22451236     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2327-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  56 in total

1.  Diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  S Ishihara; K Kawai; T Tanaka; T Kiyomatsu; K Hata; H Nozawa; T Morikawa; T Watanabe
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 2.  Management of the Complete Clinical Response.

Authors:  Angelita Habr-Gama; Guilherme Pagin São Julião; Bruna Borba Vailati; Ivana Castro; Debora Raffaele
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

Review 3.  Interval to surgery after neoadjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nir Wasserberg
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Endoscopic evaluation of clinical response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for lower rectal cancer: the significance of endoscopic complete response.

Authors:  Atsushi Ogura; Akiko Chino; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Takashi Akiyoshi; Teruhito Kishihara; Yoshiro Tamegai; Masashi Ueno; Masahiro Igarashi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Effect of adding mFOLFOX6 after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicentre, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Oliver S Chow; David D Smith; Jorge E Marcet; Peter A Cataldo; Madhulika G Varma; Anjali S Kumar; Samuel Oommen; Theodore Coutsoftides; Steven R Hunt; Michael J Stamos; Charles A Ternent; Daniel O Herzig; Alessandro Fichera; Blase N Polite; David W Dietz; Sujata Patil; Karin Avila
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 6.  Laparoscopic natural orifice specimen extraction-colectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Albert M Wolthuis; Anthony de Buck van Overstraeten; André D'Hoore
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Tailored selection of the interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer: analysis based on the pathologic stage or chemoradiation response.

Authors:  Kai-yun You; Rong Huang; Lu-ning Zhang; Pei-rong Ding; Wei-wei Xiao; Bo Qiu; Hui Chang; Zhi-fan Zeng; Zhi-zhong Pan; Yuan-hong Gao
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Prognostic factors for postoperative morbidity and tumour response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Annefleur E M Berkel; Dankert P Woutersen; Job van der Palen; Joost M Klaase
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Thymidine phosphorylase and hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α expression in clinical stage II/III rectal cancer: association with response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and prognosis.

Authors:  Shuhan Lin; Hao Lai; Yuzhou Qin; Jiansi Chen; Yuan Lin
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-09-01

Review 10.  Surgeon perspectives on the use and effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in the treatment of rectal cancer: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Sami A Chadi; Marianna Berho; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.