OBJECTIVES: To evaluate test-retest reproducibility and the validity of a physical activity questionnaire for adolescents (adapted from Self-Administered Physical Activity Checklist). METHODS: The test-retest reproducibility analysis was completed by 239 adolescents (average age 16 years, SD = 1.2; 56.4% female), and the validity analysis by 70 adolescents (average age 15.7 years, SD = 1.2; 55.7% female). All adolescents were high school students in João Pessoa, PB, in Northeastern Brazil, in 2009. The test-retest reproducibility was determined by repeated evaluations with one week interval between them. Validity of the physical activity questionnaire was assessed by comparing the results of the questionnaire with those of four 24-hour recalls (reference method). RESULTS: The test-retest reproducibility was high (intraclass correlation coefficient: ICC = 0.88; 95%CI: 0.84 - 0.91), and the agreement was moderate for physical activity classified in two groups (< 300 min/week vs. > 300 min/week; kappa coefficient: k = 0.52). Spearman correlation coefficient comparing the questionnaire data with those of four 24-hour recalls (reference method) was moderate (rho = 0.62; p < 0001). The agreement between these measures (questionnaire and 24-hours recalls) for physical activity classified in two groups was moderate (k = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: The physical activity questionnaire showed high reproducibility, and moderate validity, and therefore, its use is recommended for assessing adolescents' physical activity level.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate test-retest reproducibility and the validity of a physical activity questionnaire for adolescents (adapted from Self-Administered Physical Activity Checklist). METHODS: The test-retest reproducibility analysis was completed by 239 adolescents (average age 16 years, SD = 1.2; 56.4% female), and the validity analysis by 70 adolescents (average age 15.7 years, SD = 1.2; 55.7% female). All adolescents were high school students in João Pessoa, PB, in Northeastern Brazil, in 2009. The test-retest reproducibility was determined by repeated evaluations with one week interval between them. Validity of the physical activity questionnaire was assessed by comparing the results of the questionnaire with those of four 24-hour recalls (reference method). RESULTS: The test-retest reproducibility was high (intraclass correlation coefficient: ICC = 0.88; 95%CI: 0.84 - 0.91), and the agreement was moderate for physical activity classified in two groups (< 300 min/week vs. > 300 min/week; kappa coefficient: k = 0.52). Spearman correlation coefficient comparing the questionnaire data with those of four 24-hour recalls (reference method) was moderate (rho = 0.62; p < 0001). The agreement between these measures (questionnaire and 24-hours recalls) for physical activity classified in two groups was moderate (k = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: The physical activity questionnaire showed high reproducibility, and moderate validity, and therefore, its use is recommended for assessing adolescents' physical activity level.
Authors: D T Giannini; M C C Kuschnir; C L de Oliveira; K V Bloch; B D Schaan; F V Cureau; K M B de Carvalho; G M Dias; M Szklo Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2017-05-24 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Vivian S S Gonçalves; Taís F Galvão; Marcus T Silva; Maria C Kuschnir; Eliane S Dutra; Kênia M B Carvalho Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Joana Marcela Sales de Lucena; Luanna Alexandra Cheng; Thaísa Leite Mafaldo Cavalcante; Vanessa Araújo da Silva; José Cazuza de Farias Júnior Journal: Rev Paul Pediatr Date: 2015-08-01
Authors: Katia Vergetti Bloch; Moyses Szklo; Maria Cristina C Kuschnir; Gabriela de Azevedo Abreu; Laura Augusta Barufaldi; Carlos Henrique Klein; Maurício T L de Vasconcelos; Glória Valéria da Veiga; Valeska C Figueiredo; Adriano Dias; Ana Julia Pantoja Moraes; Ana Luiza Lima Souza; Ana Mayra Andrade de Oliveira; Beatriz D'Argord Schaan; Bruno Mendes Tavares; Cecília Lacroix de Oliveira; Cristiane de Freitas Cunha; Denise Tavares Giannini; Dilson Rodrigues Belfort; Dulce Lopes Barboza Ribas; Eduardo Lima Santos; Elisa Brosina de Leon; Elizabeth Fujimori; Elizabete Regina Araújo Oliveira; Erika da Silva Magliano; Francisco de Assis Guedes Vasconcelos; George Dantas Azevedo; Gisela Soares Brunken; Glauber Monteiro Dias; Heleno R Correa Filho; Maria Inês Monteiro; Isabel Cristina Britto Guimarães; José Rocha Faria Neto; Juliana Souza Oliveira; Kenia Mara B de Carvalho; Luis Gonzaga de Oliveira Gonçalves; Marize M Santos; Pascoal Torres Muniz; Paulo César B Veiga Jardim; Pedro Antônio Muniz Ferreira; Renan Magalhães Montenegro; Ricardo Queiroz Gurgel; Rodrigo Pinheiro Vianna; Sandra Mary Vasconcelos; Sandro Silva da Matta; Stella Maris Seixas Martins; Tamara Beres Lederer Goldberg; Thiago Luiz Nogueira da Silva Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-02-07 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Felipe Vogt Cureau; Thiago Luiz Nogueira da Silva; Katia Vergetti Bloch; Elizabeth Fujimori; Dilson Rodrigues Belfort; Kênia Mara Baiocchi de Carvalho; Elisa Brosina de Leon; Mauricio Teixeira Leite de Vasconcellos; Ulf Ekelund; Beatriz D Schaan Journal: Rev Saude Publica Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 2.106
Authors: Bruno Gonçalves Galdino da Costa; Jean-Philippe Chaput; Marcus Vinicius Veber Lopes; Luis Eduardo Argenta Malheiros; Kelly Samara Silva Journal: J Sport Health Sci Date: 2020-08-11 Impact factor: 13.077
Authors: Valter Cordeiro Barbosa Filho; Adair da Silva Lopes; Antônio Barroso Lima; Evanice Avelino de Souza; Fabiane do Amaral Gubert; Kelly Samara Silva; Neiva Francenely Cunha Vieira; Nicolino Trompieri Filho; Thábyta Silva de Araújo; Pedro Felipe Carvalhedo de Bruin; Jorge Mota Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-12-07 Impact factor: 3.295