Literature DB >> 22448857

The effects of basolateral amygdala lesions on unblocking.

Stephen E Chang1, Michael A McDannald, Daniel S Wheeler, Peter C Holland.   

Abstract

Prior reinforcement of a neutral stimulus often blocks subsequent conditioning of a new stimulus if a compound of the original and new cues is paired with the same reinforcer. However, if the value of the reinforcer is altered when the compound is presented, the new cue typically acquires conditioning, a result called unblocking. Blocking, unblocking, and related phenomena have been attributed to variations in processing of either the reinforcer, for example, the Rescorla-Wagner (1972) model, or cues, for example, the Pearce-Hall (1980) model. Here, we examined the effects of lesions of the basolateral amygdala on the occurrence of unblocking when the food reinforcer was increased in quantity at the time of introduction of the new cue. The lesions had no effects on unblocking in a simple design (Experiment 1), which did not distinguish between unblocking produced by variations in reward or cue processing. However, in a procedure that distinguished between unblocking due to direct conditioning by the added reinforcer, consistent with the Rescorla-Wagner (1972) model, and that due to increases in conditioning to the original reinforcer, consistent with the Pearce-Hall (1980) and other models of learning, the lesions prevented unblocking of the latter type. These results were discussed in the context of roles of the basolateral amygdala in coding and using reward prediction error information in associative learning. (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22448857      PMCID: PMC3315063          DOI: 10.1037/a0027576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  29 in total

1.  Amygdala circuitry in attentional and representational processes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Variations in unconditioned stimulus processing in unblocking.

Authors:  Peter C Holland; Cynthia Kenmuir
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2005-04

3.  c-Fos after incentive shifts: expectancy, incredulity, and recovery.

Authors:  Norman Pecoraro; Mary F Dallman
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Lesions of orbitofrontal cortex impair rats' differential outcome expectancy learning but not conditioned stimulus-potentiated feeding.

Authors:  Michael A McDannald; Michael P Saddoris; Michela Gallagher; Peter C Holland
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-05-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Enhanced conditioning produced by surprising increases in reinforcer value are unaffected by lesions of the amygdala central nucleus.

Authors:  Peter C Holland
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 2.877

6.  Excitation and inhibition in unblocking.

Authors:  P C Holland
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1988-07

7.  Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: expectation and prediction.

Authors:  R S Sutton; A G Barto
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Neural correlates of variations in event processing during learning in central nucleus of amygdala.

Authors:  Donna J Calu; Matthew R Roesch; Richard Z Haney; Peter C Holland; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Basal forebrain cholinergic lesions disrupt increments but not decrements in conditioned stimulus processing.

Authors:  A A Chiba; D J Bucci; P C Holland; M Gallagher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Removal of cholinergic input to rat posterior parietal cortex disrupts incremental processing of conditioned stimuli.

Authors:  D J Bucci; P C Holland; M Gallagher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  4 in total

1.  Odor-mediated taste learning requires dorsal hippocampus, but not basolateral amygdala activity.

Authors:  Daniel S Wheeler; Stephen E Chang; Peter C Holland
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  Effects of amygdala lesions on overexpectation phenomena in food cup approach and autoshaping procedures.

Authors:  Peter C Holland
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 3.  Mini-review: Prediction errors, attention and associative learning.

Authors:  Peter C Holland; Felipe L Schiffino
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 2.877

4.  Complementary contributions of basolateral amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex to value learning under uncertainty.

Authors:  Alexandra Stolyarova; Alicia Izquierdo
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 8.140

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.