Literature DB >> 15872110

Lesions of orbitofrontal cortex impair rats' differential outcome expectancy learning but not conditioned stimulus-potentiated feeding.

Michael A McDannald1, Michael P Saddoris, Michela Gallagher, Peter C Holland.   

Abstract

Patients with damage to the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) display various impairments in cognitive and affective function, including a reduced ability to use information about the consequences of their actions to guide their behavior. In this study, rats with neurotoxic lesions of the OFC failed to use specific expectancies about outcomes to guide their learning of an instrumental discrimination task. In contrast, lesioned rats were unimpaired in a measure of learned motivational function, the potentiation of feeding under conditions of food satiation, by a conditioned stimulus that had been paired with food while the rats were food deprived. Notably, performance of both of these tasks has been shown to depend on the function of the basolateral amygdala (BLA), a region that is richly interconnected with the OFC. Thus, the present results are consistent with the view that the acquisition and use of specific outcome expectancies to guide behavior critically involve a neural system that includes the BLA and the OFC, but they indicate that certain motivational properties acquired by cues on the basis of appetitive learning involve BLA circuitry apart from the OFC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15872110      PMCID: PMC1201522          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5301-04.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  39 in total

1.  Dissociation of Pavlovian and instrumental incentive learning under dopamine antagonists.

Authors:  A Dickinson; J Smith; J Mirenowicz
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Bilateral orbital prefrontal cortex lesions in rhesus monkeys disrupt choices guided by both reward value and reward contingency.

Authors:  Alicia Izquierdo; Robin K Suda; Elisabeth A Murray
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-25       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Encoding predicted outcome and acquired value in orbitofrontal cortex during cue sampling depends upon input from basolateral amygdala.

Authors:  Geoffrey Schoenbaum; Barry Setlow; Michael P Saddoris; Michela Gallagher
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Gustatory cortex in the rat. I. Physiological properties and cytoarchitecture.

Authors:  E Kosar; H J Grill; R Norgren
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1986-08-06       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Projections from the amygdaloid complex to the cerebral cortex and thalamus in the rat and cat.

Authors:  J E Krettek; J L Price
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1977-04-15       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Conditioned cues elicit feeding in sated rats: a role for learning in meal initiation.

Authors:  H P Weingarten
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-04-22       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Convergence of autonomic and limbic connections in the insular cortex of the rat.

Authors:  C B Saper
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1982-09-10       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 8.  Amygdala-frontal interactions and reward expectancy.

Authors:  Peter C Holland; Michela Gallagher
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Different roles for orbitofrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala in a reinforcer devaluation task.

Authors:  Charles L Pickens; Michael P Saddoris; Barry Setlow; Michela Gallagher; Peter C Holland; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-12-03       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Lesions of the orbitofrontal but not medial prefrontal cortex disrupt conditioned reinforcement in primates.

Authors:  Andrew Pears; John A Parkinson; Lucy Hopewell; Barry J Everitt; Angela C Roberts
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-12-03       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  45 in total

Review 1.  Does the orbitofrontal cortex signal value?

Authors:  Geoffrey Schoenbaum; Yuji Takahashi; Tzu-Lan Liu; Michael A McDannald
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 2.  All that glitters ... dissociating attention and outcome expectancy from prediction errors signals.

Authors:  Matthew R Roesch; Donna J Calu; Guillem R Esber; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  A neural systems analysis of the potentiation of feeding by conditioned stimuli.

Authors:  Peter C Holland; Gorica D Petrovich
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2005-10-25

4.  Outcome expectations drive learned behaviour in larval Drosophila.

Authors:  Bertram Gerber; Thomas Hendel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Learned contextual cue potentiates eating in rats.

Authors:  Gorica D Petrovich; Cali A Ross; Michela Gallagher; Peter C Holland
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2006-10-31

6.  Differential involvement of the basolateral amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex, and nucleus accumbens core in the acquisition and use of reward expectancies.

Authors:  Donna R Ramirez; Lisa M Savage
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Reconciling the roles of orbitofrontal cortex in reversal learning and the encoding of outcome expectancies.

Authors:  Geoffrey Schoenbaum; Michael P Saddoris; Thomas A Stalnaker
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  The Role of the Rodent Lateral Orbitofrontal Cortex in Simple Pavlovian Cue-Outcome Learning Depends on Training Experience.

Authors:  Marios C Panayi; Simon Killcross
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2021-02-09

Review 9.  What the orbitofrontal cortex does not do.

Authors:  Thomas A Stalnaker; Nisha K Cooch; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 10.  A new perspective on the role of the orbitofrontal cortex in adaptive behaviour.

Authors:  Geoffrey Schoenbaum; Matthew R Roesch; Thomas A Stalnaker; Yuji K Takahashi
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 34.870

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.