Literature DB >> 26948122

Mini-review: Prediction errors, attention and associative learning.

Peter C Holland1, Felipe L Schiffino2.   

Abstract

Most modern theories of associative learning emphasize a critical role for prediction error (PE, the difference between received and expected events). One class of theories, exemplified by the Rescorla-Wagner (1972) model, asserts that PE determines the effectiveness of the reinforcer or unconditioned stimulus (US): surprising reinforcers are more effective than expected ones. A second class, represented by the Pearce-Hall (1980) model, argues that PE determines the associability of conditioned stimuli (CSs), the rate at which they may enter into new learning: the surprising delivery or omission of a reinforcer enhances subsequent processing of the CSs that were present when PE was induced. In this mini-review we describe evidence, mostly from our laboratory, for PE-induced changes in the associability of both CSs and USs, and the brain systems involved in the coding, storage and retrieval of these altered associability values. This evidence favors a number of modifications to behavioral models of how PE influences event processing, and suggests the involvement of widespread brain systems in animals' responses to PE.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Associability; Associative learning; Attention; Pearce–Hall model; Prediction error

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26948122      PMCID: PMC4862921          DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2016.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  47 in total

Review 1.  Memory--a century of consolidation.

Authors:  J L McGaugh
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-01-14       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Variations in unconditioned stimulus processing in unblocking.

Authors:  Peter C Holland; Cynthia Kenmuir
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2005-04

3.  Enhanced conditioning produced by surprising increases in reinforcer value are unaffected by lesions of the amygdala central nucleus.

Authors:  Peter C Holland
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 2.877

4.  Disruption of decrements in conditioned stimulus processing by selective removal of hippocampal cholinergic input.

Authors:  M G Baxter; P C Holland; M Gallagher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Attention, reward, and information seeking.

Authors:  Jacqueline Gottlieb; Mary Hayhoe; Okihide Hikosaka; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Excitation and inhibition in unblocking.

Authors:  P C Holland
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1988-07

7.  Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: expectation and prediction.

Authors:  R S Sutton; A G Barto
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Role of amygdala central nucleus in feature negative discriminations.

Authors:  Peter C Holland
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Removal of cholinergic input to rat posterior parietal cortex disrupts incremental processing of conditioned stimuli.

Authors:  D J Bucci; P C Holland; M Gallagher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Effects of hippocampal lesions in overshadowing and blocking procedures.

Authors:  Peter C Holland; Gregory D Fox
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.912

View more
  23 in total

1.  Effects of amygdala lesions on overexpectation phenomena in food cup approach and autoshaping procedures.

Authors:  Peter C Holland
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Amygdala and Ventral Striatum Make Distinct Contributions to Reinforcement Learning.

Authors:  Vincent D Costa; Olga Dal Monte; Daniel R Lucas; Elisabeth A Murray; Bruno B Averbeck
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Valence biases in reinforcement learning shift across adolescence and modulate subsequent memory.

Authors:  Gail M Rosenbaum; Hannah L Grassie; Catherine A Hartley
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 4.  Role of the locus coeruleus and basal forebrain in arousal and attention.

Authors:  Eden B Maness; Joshua A Burk; James T McKenna; Felipe L Schiffino; Robert E Strecker; John G McCoy
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.715

5.  Cerebellum and Emotion Memory.

Authors:  Melanie Mark; Johanna Pakusch; Thomas M Ernst; Dagmar Timmann
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  Consolidation of altered associability information by amygdala central nucleus.

Authors:  Felipe L Schiffino; Peter C Holland
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 2.877

7.  Stimulus preexposure speeds or slows subsequent acquisition of associative learning depending on learning test procedures and response measure.

Authors:  Peter C Holland
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Secondary visual cortex is critical to the expression of surprise-induced enhancements in cue associability in rats.

Authors:  Felipe L Schiffino; Peter C Holland
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Affective memory rehearsal with temporal sequences in amygdala neurons.

Authors:  Tamar Reitich-Stolero; Rony Paz
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  The control of tonic pain by active relief learning.

Authors:  Suyi Zhang; Hiroaki Mano; Michael Lee; Wako Yoshida; Mitsuo Kawato; Trevor W Robbins; Ben Seymour
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.