Literature DB >> 22441756

Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study.

A M Leufkens1, M G H van Oijen, F P Vleggaar, P D Siersema.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: In patients undergoing colonoscopy, 22 % - 28 % of polyps and 20 % - 24 % of adenomas are missed. It is unclear which factors contribute to polyp miss rates, but colorectal cancer detected within 3 years after colonoscopy may originate from missed lesions. The aim of the current study was to determine patient- and polyp-related factors that influence the miss rates of polyps and adenomas during colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 406 patients were obtained from a multicenter, randomized back-to-back colonoscopy study investigating the Third Eye Retroscope (TER) in improving polyp detection rate by visualizing hidden areas such as folds and curves. Patients were randomized to undergo standard colonoscopy followed by colonoscopy with TER, or vice versa. Miss rates were calculated for all polyps and adenomas. All lesions were categorized for size and location within the colon/rectum. Odds ratios (ORs) were computed using adjusted logistic regression models to identify factors independently associated with missed lesions.
RESULTS: The miss rate was 25 % (150 /611) for all polyps and 26 % (90 /350) for adenomas. Miss rates were significantly lower (21 % vs. 29 %) in patients randomized to TER as the first procedure (P < 0.03). Taking all groups together, > 2 polyps compared with ≤ 2 polyps detected during the first colonoscopy increased the risk of missing additional polyps (adjusted OR = 2.83; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.22 - 6.70). Adenomas in the left colon compared with adenomas in the right colon were also more frequently missed (adjusted OR = 1.65; 95 %CI 1.06 - 2.58).
CONCLUSIONS: A quarter of polyps were missed during colonoscopy. Physicians should be aware that the risk of missing a polyp is related to patient factors (presence of > 2 polyps) and polyp factors (left colon location). © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22441756     DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1291666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  59 in total

1.  Improved bowel preparation increases polyp detection and unmasks significant polyp miss rate.

Authors:  Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Athanasios D Sioulas; Nektarios Magdalinos; Iosif Beintaris; Lazaros-Dimitrios Lazaridis; Dimitrios Polymeros; Chrysoula Malli; George D Dimitriadis; Konstantinos Triantafyllou
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 2.  How to improve colon cancer screening rates.

Authors:  Luiz Ronaldo Alberti; Diego Paim Carvalho Garcia; Debora Lucciola Coelho; David Correa Alves De Lima; Andy Petroianu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-12-15

Review 3.  Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Personalized Surveillance After Colorectal Adenomatous Polypectomy.

Authors:  Ethna McFerran; James F O'Mahony; Richard Fallis; Duncan McVicar; Ann G Zauber; Frank Kee
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 4.  Fluorescence Imaging for Cancer Screening and Surveillance.

Authors:  K E Tipirneni; E L Rosenthal; L S Moore; A D Haskins; N Udayakumar; A H Jani; W R Carroll; A B Morlandt; M Bogyo; J Rao; Jason M Warram
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Standard forward-viewing colonoscopy versus full-spectrum endoscopy: an international, multicentre, randomised, tandem colonoscopy trial.

Authors:  Ian M Gralnek; Peter D Siersema; Zamir Halpern; Ori Segol; Alaa Melhem; Alain Suissa; Erwin Santo; Alan Sloyer; Jay Fenster; Leon M G Moons; Vincent K Dik; Ralph B D'Agostino; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Morning colonoscopies are associated with improved adenoma detection rates.

Authors:  Tze Yeong Teng; Shao Nan Khor; Manimegalai Kailasam; Wei Keat Cheah; Cheryl Chien Li Lau
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Is Dynamic Position Changes an Effective Way to Improve the Adenoma Detection Rate?

Authors:  Sheng-Bing Zhao; Hui Wan; Zhao-Shen Li; Yu Bai
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Near-Infrared Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy Detects Colorectal Cancer via an Integrin αvβ 3 Optical Probe.

Authors:  Petra Schulz; Cordula Dierkes; Bertram Wiedenmann; Carsten Grötzinger
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Findings on interval colonoscopies: an auditable performance indicator for colonoscopy quality?

Authors:  P G Vaughan-Shaw; M Aung; K Sahnan; P Rai; A Goodman
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-30

10.  Multimodal Video Colonoscope for Targeted Wide-Field Detection of Nonpolypoid Colorectal Neoplasia.

Authors:  Bishnu P Joshi; Asha Pant; Xiyu Duan; Anoop Prabhu; Erik J Wamsteker; Richard S Kwon; Grace H Elta; Scott R Owens; Henry D Appelman; Thomas D Wang; D Kim Turgeon
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 22.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.