Literature DB >> 28717884

Serum concentrations of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) do not indicate tumor recurrence in patients with glioblastoma.

Julia-Mareen Vietheer1, Johannes Rieger2,3, Marlies Wagner4, Christian Senft5, Julia Tichy6,7, Christian Foerch1.   

Abstract

Recent studies identified serum concentrations of the astroglial protein glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) to be indicative of glioblastoma (GBM) in patients with newly diagnosed space occupying cerebral mass lesions. Until now, no data is available whether GFAP serum concentrations decrease after first therapy and whether GFAP may be used as a predictor of survival and an indicator of tumor recurrence. In this prospective study, we included 44 patients with a single space occupying cerebral mass lesion suspicious for GBM. GBM was histopathologically proven in 33 cases. After initial therapy, patients were followed up until tumor recurrence (defined according to the RANO criteria) or death (maximum observation period 78 weeks). Blood was sampled on a regular basis, and GFAP serum levels were determined using an immunofluorescence assay. Prior to any intervention, 14 of the 33 GBM patients had elevated GFAP serum concentrations (median 0.25 µg/L, interquartile range 0.13-0.53), whereas only one out of 11 patients having other tumor entities revealed a slightly increased GFAP serum level (0.06 µg/L). Following surgery (i.e., biopsy, full or partial resection), all initially GFAP positive GBM patients showed decreased serum concentrations. During the follow-up period, we found a minimal GFAP increase in one patient only (0.04 µg/L; week 52), although 23 out of 31 available GBM patients developed tumor progression or died. No difference was found regarding the survival rate and the time to tumor recurrence between initially GFAP positive and GFAP negative GBM patients. In GBM patients, initially elevated GFAP serum concentrations decrease after the first diagnostic or therapeutic intervention. GFAP was not predictive for tumor recurrence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; GFAP; Glioblastoma; Serum; Tumor recurrence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28717884     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2565-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  21 in total

1.  Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group.

Authors:  Patrick Y Wen; David R Macdonald; David A Reardon; Timothy F Cloughesy; A Gregory Sorensen; Evanthia Galanis; John Degroot; Wolfgang Wick; Mark R Gilbert; Andrew B Lassman; Christina Tsien; Tom Mikkelsen; Eric T Wong; Marc C Chamberlain; Roger Stupp; Kathleen R Lamborn; Michael A Vogelbaum; Martin J van den Bent; Susan M Chang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse: imaging challenges in the assessment of posttreatment glioma.

Authors:  L C Hygino da Cruz; I Rodriguez; R C Domingues; E L Gasparetto; A G Sorensen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Localization of the glial fibrillary acidic protein in astrocytes by immunofluorescence.

Authors:  A Bignami; L F Eng; D Dahl; C T Uyeda
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1972-08-25       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Serum Levels Distinguish between Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Cerebral Ischemia in the Early Phase of Stroke.

Authors:  Sebastian Luger; Jens Witsch; Andreas Dietz; Gerhard F Hamann; Jens Minnerup; Hauke Schneider; Matthias Sitzer; Katja E Wartenberg; Marion Niessner; Christian Foerch
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 5.  Glial fibrillary acidic protein: GFAP-thirty-one years (1969-2000).

Authors:  L F Eng; R S Ghirnikar; Y L Lee
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.996

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein for differentiating intracerebral hemorrhage and cerebral ischemia in patients with symptoms of acute stroke.

Authors:  Christian Foerch; Marion Niessner; Tobias Back; Michael Bauerle; Gian Marco De Marchis; Andreas Ferbert; Holger Grehl; Gerhard F Hamann; Andreas Jacobs; Andreas Kastrup; Sven Klimpe; Frederick Palm; Götz Thomalla; Hans Worthmann; Matthias Sitzer
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Pre- and post-operative plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein levels in patients with newly diagnosed gliomas.

Authors:  Hatim Husain; William Savage; Stuart A Grossman; Xiaobu Ye; Peter C Burger; Allen Everett; Chetan Bettegowda; Luis A Diaz; Cherie Blair; Katharine E Romans; Matthias Holdhoff
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Astroglial proteins as diagnostic markers of acute intracerebral hemorrhage-pathophysiological background and clinical findings.

Authors:  Robert Brunkhorst; Waltraud Pfeilschifter; Christian Foerch
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 6.829

9.  Early changes measured by magnetic resonance imaging in cerebral blood flow, blood volume, and blood-brain barrier permeability following dexamethasone treatment in patients with brain tumors.

Authors:  L Ostergaard; F H Hochberg; J D Rabinov; A G Sorensen; M Lev; L Kim; R M Weisskoff; R G Gonzalez; C Gyldensted; B R Rosen
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Glial fibrillary acidic protein is highly correlated with brain injury.

Authors:  Kimberly M Lumpkins; Grant V Bochicchio; Kaspar Keledjian; J Marc Simard; Maureen McCunn; Thomas Scalea
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-10
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Blood GFAP as an emerging biomarker in brain and spinal cord disorders.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdelhak; Matteo Foschi; Samir Abu-Rumeileh; John K Yue; Lucio D'Anna; Andre Huss; Patrick Oeckl; Albert C Ludolph; Jens Kuhle; Axel Petzold; Geoffrey T Manley; Ari J Green; Markus Otto; Hayrettin Tumani
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 44.711

Review 2.  Glioblastoma: Is There Any Blood Biomarker with True Clinical Relevance?

Authors:  Paulo Linhares; Bruno Carvalho; Rui Vaz; Bruno M Costa
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Blood-Based Biomarkers for Glioma in the Context of Gliomagenesis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hamza Ali; Romée Harting; Ralph de Vries; Meedie Ali; Thomas Wurdinger; Myron G Best
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 4.  Molecular Determinants of Malignant Brain Cancers: From Intracellular Alterations to Invasion Mediated by Extracellular Vesicles.

Authors:  Gabriella Schiera; Carlo Maria Di Liegro; Italia Di Liegro
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Serum long noncoding RNA HOTAIR as a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Sze Kiat Tan; Chiara Pastori; Clara Penas; Ricardo J Komotar; Michael E Ivan; Claes Wahlestedt; Nagi G Ayad
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 27.401

6.  Importance of GFAP isoform-specific analyses in astrocytoma.

Authors:  Emma J van Bodegraven; Jessy V van Asperen; Pierre A J Robe; Elly M Hol
Journal:  Glia       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 7.452

Review 7.  Molecular and Cellular Complexity of Glioma. Focus on Tumour Microenvironment and the Use of Molecular and Imaging Biomarkers to Overcome Treatment Resistance.

Authors:  Silvia Valtorta; Daniela Salvatore; Paolo Rainone; Sara Belloli; Gloria Bertoli; Rosa Maria Moresco
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.