OBJECTIVE: To compare the response in quality of life (QoL) to growth hormone (GH) replacement in women with GH deficiency (GHD) and a history of acromegaly with that in women with GHD of other causes. METHODS:Fifty-five women with GHD were studied: 17 with prior acromegaly and 38 with other causes of GHD. We compared two 6-month, randomized, placebo-controlled studies of GH therapy in women with hypopituitarism conducted with use of the same design-one in women with a history of acromegaly and one in women with no prior acromegaly. QoL was assessed with the following questionnaires: the QoL-Assessment of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Adults (AGHDA), the Symptom Questionnaire, and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). RESULTS: The 2 groups had comparable mean pretreatment age, body mass index, and QoL scores and comparable mean GH dose at 6 months (0.61 ± 0.30 versus 0.67 ± 0.27 mg daily). After 6 months of GH replacement therapy, women with GHD and prior acromegaly demonstrated a greater improvement in AGHDA score, four SF-36 sub-scales (Role Limitations due to Physical Health, Energy or Fatigue, Emotional Well-Being, and Social Functioning), and the Somatic Symptoms subscale of the Symptom Questionnaire than did women with GHD of other causes. Poorer pretreatment QoL was associated with a greater improvement in QoL after administration of GH. CONCLUSION: In this study, GH replacement therapy improved QoL in women with GHD and a history of acromegaly but not in women with GHD due to other hypothalamic and pituitary disorders. Further studies are needed to determine the long-term risks versus benefits of GH replacement in patients who develop GHD after definitive treatment for acromegaly.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the response in quality of life (QoL) to growth hormone (GH) replacement in women with GH deficiency (GHD) and a history of acromegaly with that in women with GHD of other causes. METHODS: Fifty-five women with GHD were studied: 17 with prior acromegaly and 38 with other causes of GHD. We compared two 6-month, randomized, placebo-controlled studies of GH therapy in women with hypopituitarism conducted with use of the same design-one in women with a history of acromegaly and one in women with no prior acromegaly. QoL was assessed with the following questionnaires: the QoL-Assessment of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Adults (AGHDA), the Symptom Questionnaire, and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). RESULTS: The 2 groups had comparable mean pretreatment age, body mass index, and QoL scores and comparable mean GH dose at 6 months (0.61 ± 0.30 versus 0.67 ± 0.27 mg daily). After 6 months of GH replacement therapy, women with GHD and prior acromegaly demonstrated a greater improvement in AGHDA score, four SF-36 sub-scales (Role Limitations due to Physical Health, Energy or Fatigue, Emotional Well-Being, and Social Functioning), and the Somatic Symptoms subscale of the Symptom Questionnaire than did women with GHD of other causes. Poorer pretreatment QoL was associated with a greater improvement in QoL after administration of GH. CONCLUSION: In this study, GH replacement therapy improved QoL in women with GHD and a history of acromegaly but not in women with GHD due to other hypothalamic and pituitary disorders. Further studies are needed to determine the long-term risks versus benefits of GH replacement in patients who develop GHD after definitive treatment for acromegaly.
Authors: A F Attanasio; S W Lamberts; A M Matranga; M A Birkett; P C Bates; N K Valk; J Hilsted; B A Bengtsson; C J Strasburger Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Nienke R Biermasz; Sjoerd W van Thiel; Alberto M Pereira; Hendrieke C Hoftijzer; Albert M van Hemert; Jan W A Smit; Johannes A Romijn; Ferdinand Roelfsema Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Nienke R Biermasz; Alberto M Pereira; Jan W A Smit; Johannes A Romijn; Ferdinand Roelfsema Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2005-03-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Susannah V Rowles; L Prieto; X Badia; Steven M Shalet; Susan M Webb; Peter J Trainer Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2005-03-08 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: H B Baum; L Katznelson; J C Sherman; B M Biller; D L Hayden; D A Schoenfeld; K E Cannistraro; A Klibanski Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: P Burman; J E Broman; J Hetta; I Wiklund; E M Erfurth; E Hagg; F A Karlsson Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 1995-12 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Cornelie D Andela; Margreet Scharloo; Alberto M Pereira; Ad A Kaptein; Nienke R Biermasz Journal: Pituitary Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 4.107
Authors: Pouneh K Fazeli; Jonathan G Teoh; Eleanor L Lam; Anu V Gerweck; Tamara L Wexler; Eliza P Teo; Brian M Russell; Ronen Durst; David McCarty; Rory B Weiner; Michael H Picard; Anne Klibanski; Karen K Miller Journal: Growth Horm IGF Res Date: 2015-12-03 Impact factor: 2.372
Authors: Karol Piotr Sagan; Elżbieta Andrysiak-Mamos; Ernest Tyburski; Leszek Michał Sagan; Anhelli Syrenicz Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-04-26 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Victor J Geraedts; Cornelie D Andela; Günter K Stalla; Alberto M Pereira; Wouter R van Furth; Caroline Sievers; Nienke R Biermasz Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2017-03-03 Impact factor: 5.555
Authors: Peter H Kann; Simona Bergmann; Martin Bidlingmaier; Christina Dimopoulou; Birgitte T Pedersen; Günter K Stalla; Matthias M Weber; Stefanie Meckes-Ferber Journal: BMC Endocr Disord Date: 2018-02-13 Impact factor: 2.763