Literature DB >> 22440643

Subfields of the hippocampal formation at 7 T MRI: in vivo volumetric assessment.

L E M Wisse1, L Gerritsen, J J M Zwanenburg, H J Kuijf, P R Luijten, G J Biessels, M I Geerlings.   

Abstract

Animal and human autopsy studies suggest that subfields of the hippocampal formation are differentially affected by neuropsychiatric diseases. Therefore, subfield volumes may be more sensitive to effects of disease processes. The few human studies that segmented subfields of the hippocampal formation in vivo either assessed the subfields only in the body of the hippocampus, assessed only three subfields, or did not take the differential angulation of the head of the hippocampus into account. We developed a protocol using 7 Tesla MRI with isotropic voxels to reliably delineate the entorhinal cortex (ERC), subiculum (SUB), CA1, CA2, CA3, dentate gyrus (DG)&CA4 along the full-length of the hippocampus. Fourteen subjects (aged 54-74 years, 2 men and 12 women) were scanned with a 3D turbo spin echo (TSE) sequence with isotropic voxels of 0.7 × 0.7 × 0.7 mm(3) on a 7 T MRI whole body scanner. Based on previous protocols and extensive anatomic atlases, a new protocol for segmentation of subfields of the hippocampal formation was formulated. ERC, SUB, CA1, CA2, CA3 and DG&CA4 were manually segmented twice by one rater from coronal MR images. Good-to-excellent consistency was found for all subfields (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient's (ICC) varying from 0.74 to 0.98). Accuracy as measured with the Dice Similarity Index (DSI) was above 0.82 for all subfields, with the exception of the smaller subfield CA3 (0.68-0.70). In conclusion, this study shows that it is possible to delineate the main subfields of the hippocampal formation along its full-length in vivo at 7 T MRI. Our data give evidence that this can be done in a reliable manner. Segmentation of subfields in the full-length of the hippocampus may bolster the study of the etiology neuropsychiatric diseases.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22440643     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  88 in total

1.  In vivo MRI signatures of hippocampal subfield pathology in intractable epilepsy.

Authors:  Maged Goubran; Boris C Bernhardt; Diego Cantor-Rivera; Jonathan C Lau; Charlotte Blinston; Robert R Hammond; Sandrine de Ribaupierre; Jorge G Burneo; Seyed M Mirsattari; David A Steven; Andrew G Parrent; Andrea Bernasconi; Neda Bernasconi; Terry M Peters; Ali R Khan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  In vivo normative atlas of the hippocampal subfields using multi-echo susceptibility imaging at 7 Tesla.

Authors:  Maged Goubran; David A Rudko; Brendan Santyr; Joe Gati; Trevor Szekeres; Terry M Peters; Ali R Khan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  A computational atlas of the hippocampal formation using ex vivo, ultra-high resolution MRI: Application to adaptive segmentation of in vivo MRI.

Authors:  Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Jean C Augustinack; Khoa Nguyen; Christopher M Player; Allison Player; Michelle Wright; Nicole Roy; Matthew P Frosch; Ann C McKee; Lawrence L Wald; Bruce Fischl; Koen Van Leemput
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Hippocampal substructural vulnerability to sleep disturbance and cognitive impairment in patients with chronic primary insomnia: magnetic resonance imaging morphometry.

Authors:  Eun Yeon Joo; Hosung Kim; Sooyeon Suh; Seung Bong Hong
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 5.849

5.  Cortical microinfarcts on 7T MRI in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Susanne J van Veluw; Wilmar M T Jolink; Jeroen Hendrikse; Mirjam I Geerlings; Peter R Luijten; Geert Jan Biessels; Catharina J M Klijn
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 6.200

6.  Differential associations of age with volume and microstructure of hippocampal subfields in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Dominik Wolf; Florian U Fischer; Robin de Flores; Gaël Chételat; Andreas Fellgiebel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  Automated methods for hippocampus segmentation: the evolution and a review of the state of the art.

Authors:  Vanderson Dill; Alexandre Rosa Franco; Márcio Sarroglia Pinho
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2015-04

8.  Hippocampal (subfield) volume and shape in relation to cognitive performance across the adult lifespan.

Authors:  Aristotle N Voineskos; Julie L Winterburn; Daniel Felsky; Jon Pipitone; Tarek K Rajji; Benoit H Mulsant; M Mallar Chakravarty
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Hippocampal Structure Predicts Statistical Learning and Associative Inference Abilities during Development.

Authors:  Margaret L Schlichting; Katharine F Guarino; Anna C Schapiro; Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Alison R Preston
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  High-resolution In Vivo Manual Segmentation Protocol for Human Hippocampal Subfields Using 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Julie Winterburn; Jens C Pruessner; Chavez Sofia; Mark M Schira; Nancy J Lobaugh; Aristotle N Voineskos; M Mallar Chakravarty
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.