OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether patients with diagnosed erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (ERD) have an increased probability of halitosis and tongue coating compared to patients with nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients (33 males and 33 females) were recruited for the study and received an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The presence of ERD (n = 31) and NERD (n = 35) was classified based on the Los Angeles classification for erosive changes in the esophagus. Additionally, the patients filled in a questionnaire regarding their subjective assessment of halitosis, and an organoleptic assessment of halitosis, a measurement of oral volatile sulfur compounds (VSC) with the Halimeter, and a tongue coating index were performed. ERD and NERD subjects were compared with regard to Halitosis-related clinical and anamnestic findings. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference could be found between ERD and NERD patients regarding tongue coating index, organoleptic scores, and VSC values as well as self-perceived bad taste, tongue coating, and bad breath. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that halitosis is not typically associated with erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease and the presence of esophageal mucosal damage (ERD patients). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The data of this investigation support the findings of interdisciplinary bad breath clinics that gastroesophageal reflux disease is not a leading cause for halitosis.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether patients with diagnosed erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (ERD) have an increased probability of halitosis and tongue coating compared to patients with nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients (33 males and 33 females) were recruited for the study and received an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The presence of ERD (n = 31) and NERD (n = 35) was classified based on the Los Angeles classification for erosive changes in the esophagus. Additionally, the patients filled in a questionnaire regarding their subjective assessment of halitosis, and an organoleptic assessment of halitosis, a measurement of oral volatile sulfur compounds (VSC) with the Halimeter, and a tongue coating index were performed. ERD and NERD subjects were compared with regard to Halitosis-related clinical and anamnestic findings. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference could be found between ERD and NERD patients regarding tongue coating index, organoleptic scores, and VSC values as well as self-perceived bad taste, tongue coating, and bad breath. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that halitosis is not typically associated with erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease and the presence of esophageal mucosal damage (ERD patients). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The data of this investigation support the findings of interdisciplinary bad breath clinics that gastroesophageal reflux disease is not a leading cause for halitosis.
Authors: Jae Hee Cho; Hee Man Kim; Geun Jun Ko; Myoung Lyeol Woo; Chang Mo Moon; Yu Jin Kim; Ki Jun Han; Si Young Song; Hyeon Geun Cho Journal: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 4.029
Authors: Clive H Wilder-Smith; Petra Wilder-Smith; Hilari Kawakami-Wong; Julia Voronets; Kathy Osann; Adrian Lussi Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-08-04 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Karin Kislig; Clive H Wilder-Smith; Michael M Bornstein; Adrian Lussi; Rainer Seemann Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2013-08-09 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Lee M Akst; Jonathan M Bock; Jerome R Lechien; Thomas L Carroll; Jacqueline E Allen; Tareck Ayad; Necati Enver; Young-Gyu Eun; Paulo S Perazzo; Fabio Pupo Ceccon; Geraldo D Sant'Anna; Rui Imamura; Sampath Kumar Raghunandhan; Carlos M Chiesa-Estomba; Christian Calvo-Henriquez; Sven Saussez; Petros D Karkos; Marc Remacle Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2021-02-27 Impact factor: 2.503