Literature DB >> 22436892

Bats use a neuronally implemented computational acoustic model to form sonar images.

James A Simmons1.   

Abstract

This paper reexamines neurophysiological results from echolocating big brown bats to propose a new perspective on FM biosonar processing in the auditory system. Individual auditory neurons are frequency-tuned and respond to brief, 2-10 ms FM sweeps with an average of one spike per sound to register their tuned frequencies, to detect echo arrival, or to register a local null in the echo spectrum. When initiated by the broadcast, these responses comprise a cascade of single spikes distributed across time in neurons tuned to different frequencies that persists for 30-50 ms, long after the sound has ended. Their progress mirrors the broadcast's propagation away from the bat and the return of echoes for distances out to 5-8 m. Each returning echo evokes a similar pattern of single spikes that coincide with ongoing responses to the broadcast to register the target's distance and shape. The hypothesis advanced here is that this flow of responses over time acts as an internal model of sonar acoustics that the bat executes using neuronal computations distributed across many neurons to accumulate a dynamic image of the bat's surroundings.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22436892     DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol        ISSN: 0959-4388            Impact factor:   6.627


  21 in total

1.  Temporal encoding precision of bat auditory neurons tuned to target distance deteriorates on the way to the cortex.

Authors:  Silvio Macías; Julio C Hechavarría; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  A model of order-selectivity based on dynamic changes in the balance of excitation and inhibition produced by short-term synaptic plasticity.

Authors:  Vishwa Goudar; Dean V Buonomano
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Neural representation of the self-heard biosonar click in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus).

Authors:  James J Finneran; Jason Mulsow; Dorian S Houser; Carolyn E Schlundt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Temporal binding of neural responses for focused attention in biosonar.

Authors:  James A Simmons
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Development of echolocation calls and neural selectivity for echolocation calls in the pallid bat.

Authors:  Khaleel A Razak; Zoltan M Fuzessery
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.964

6.  A comprehensive computational model of animal biosonar signal processing.

Authors:  Chen Ming; Stephanie Haro; Andrea Megela Simmons; James A Simmons
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  The electrocardiogram signal of Seba's short-tailed bat, Carollia perspicillata.

Authors:  Diana Mihova; Julio C Hechavarría
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Target shape perception and clutter rejection use the same mechanism in bat sonar.

Authors:  Michaela Warnecke; James A Simmons
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Size does not matter: size-invariant echo-acoustic object classification.

Authors:  Daria Genzel; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Echolocating bats rely on an innate speed-of-sound reference.

Authors:  Eran Amichai; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.