Literature DB >> 23180047

Size does not matter: size-invariant echo-acoustic object classification.

Daria Genzel1, Lutz Wiegrebe.   

Abstract

Echolocating bats can not only extract spatial information from the auditory analysis of their ultrasonic emissions, they can also discriminate, classify and identify the three-dimensional shape of objects reflecting their emissions. Effective object recognition requires the segregation of size and shape information. Previous studies have shown that, like in visual object recognition, bats can transfer an echo-acoustic object discrimination task to objects of different size and that they spontaneously classify scaled versions of virtual echo-acoustic objects according to trained virtual-object standards. The current study aims to bridge the gap between these previous findings using a different class of real objects and a classification-instead of a discrimination paradigm. Echolocating bats (Phyllostomus discolor) were trained to classify an object as either a sphere or an hour-glass shaped object. The bats spontaneously generalised this classification to objects of the same shape. The generalisation cannot be explained based on similarities of the power spectra or temporal structures of the echo-acoustic object images and thus require dedicated neural mechanisms dealing with size-invariant echo-acoustic object analysis. Control experiments with human listeners classifying the echo-acoustic images of the objects confirm the universal validity of auditory size invariance. The current data thus corroborate and extend previous psychophysical evidence for sonar auditory-object normalisation and suggest that the underlying auditory mechanisms following the initial neural extraction of the echo-acoustic images in echolocating bats may be very similar in bats and humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23180047     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-012-0777-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  36 in total

Review 1.  Bats use a neuronally implemented computational acoustic model to form sonar images.

Authors:  James A Simmons
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Time-variant spectral peak and notch detection in echolocation-call sequences in bats.

Authors:  Daria Genzel; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  A method for evaluating temporal, spectral and combined temporal-spectral resolution of hearing.

Authors:  B Larsby; S Arlinger
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1998

4.  Size scaling in visual pattern recognition.

Authors:  A Larsen; C Bundesen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Using functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess adaptation and size invariance of shape processing by humans and monkeys.

Authors:  Hiromasa Sawamura; Svetlana Georgieva; Rufin Vogels; Wim Vanduffel; G A Orban
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Adaptive behavior for texture discrimination by the free-flying big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  Ben Falk; Tameeka Williams; Murat Aytekin; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Temporal integration in the echolocating bat, Megaderma lyra.

Authors:  L Wiegrebe; S Schmidt
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-12-01       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  Visual object recognition.

Authors:  N K Logothetis; D L Sheinberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  Cochlear sensitivity in the lesser spear-nosed bat, Phyllostomus discolor.

Authors:  Anna Wittekindt; Markus Drexl; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-09-18       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  The processing and perception of size information in speech sounds.

Authors:  David R R Smith; Roy D Patterson; Richard Turner; Hideki Kawahara; Toshio Irino
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  6 in total

1.  Echolocating bats detect but misperceive a multidimensional incongruent acoustic stimulus.

Authors:  Sasha Danilovich; Gal Shalev; Arjan Boonman; Aya Goldshtein; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Place recognition using batlike sonar.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Jan Steckel; Andre Boen; Herbert Peremans; Marc W Holderied
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  A computational model for biosonar echoes from foliage.

Authors:  Chen Ming; Anupam Kumar Gupta; Ruijin Lu; Hongxiao Zhu; Rolf Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Acoustic traits of bat-pollinated flowers compared to flowers of other pollination syndromes and their echo-based classification using convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Ralph Simon; Karol Bakunowski; Angel Eduardo Reyes-Vasques; Marco Tschapka; Mirjam Knörnschild; Jan Steckel; Dan Stowell
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  A simplified model of biosonar echoes from foliage and the properties of natural foliages.

Authors:  Chen Ming; Hongxiao Zhu; Rolf Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A fully autonomous terrestrial bat-like acoustic robot.

Authors:  Itamar Eliakim; Zahi Cohen; Gabor Kosa; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 4.475

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.