Literature DB >> 20169514

Interlaboratory variation in factor VIII:C inhibitor assay results is sufficient to influence patient management: data from the UK national quality external assessment scheme for blood coagulation.

Steve Kitchen1, Ian Jennings, F Eric Preston, Dianne P Kitchen, Tim A L Woods, Isobel D Walker.   

Abstract

We report the results of external quality assessment exercises in which 60 to 120 centers performed factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitor testing on a series of samples over a 13-year period. Samples from seven different subjects were distributed for analysis comprising the following: four different subjects with severe hemophilia A with antibodies following replacement therapy, one subject with acquired hemophilia A and antibodies to FVIII, one subject with normal FVIII and an easily detected lupus anticoagulant, and one subject with mild hemophilia A and a difficult-to-detect lupus anticoagulant but without antibodies to FVIII. In all of the surveys the results obtained in different centers analyzing the same sample varied to an extent that would influence patient management decisions. In the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme surveys reported here, there was considerable interlaboratory variation in the results of FVIII inhibitor testing that did not improve over the survey period. The coefficient of variation of results in different centers was between 33% and 106% in samples from patients with severe congenital hemophilia A. In some cases, results were affected by assay components. For one plasma, the mean FVIII inhibitor results in centers using one source of normal plasma was 3.9 Bethesda unit (BU)/mL compared with a mean of 5.7 BU/mL in centers using a different normal plasma source ( P = 0.04). Our data indicate that the detection of FVIII inhibitors is not the same in different centers, and the degree of variability noted makes it likely that assay variability has contributed to the lack of international consensus in relation to the real incidence of FVIII inhibitors in different clinical settings. Improvements in assay standardization are urgently needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20169514     DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost        ISSN: 0094-6176            Impact factor:   4.180


  4 in total

1.  Validation of Nijmegen-Bethesda assay modifications to allow inhibitor measurement during replacement therapy and facilitate inhibitor surveillance.

Authors:  C H Miller; S J Platt; A S Rice; F Kelly; J M Soucie
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.824

2.  Usefulness of anti-factor VIII IgG ELISA in acquired hemophilia A follow-up.

Authors:  Albain Chansavang; Aurélien Philippe; Ines Bozinovic; Khalil Ben Hadj Ali; David Smadja; Dominique Helley; Luc Darnige; Laetitia Mauge
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  Variability between laboratories performing coagulation tests with identical platforms: a nationwide evaluation study.

Authors:  Michael Nagler; Lucas M Bachmann; Lorenzo Alberio; Anne Angelillo-Scherrer; Lars M Asmis; Wolfgang Korte; Adriana Mendez; Guido Reber; Hans Stricker; Dimitrios A Tsakiris; Walter A Wuillemin
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2013-03-07

4.  A public health approach to the prevention of inhibitors in hemophilia.

Authors:  J Michael Soucie; Connie H Miller; Fiona M Kelly; Meredith Oakley; Deborah L Brown; Phillip Kucab
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 5.043

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.