Literature DB >> 18607857

Cost-effectiveness of maintenance rituximab treatment after second line therapy in patients with follicular lymphoma in Sweden.

Frida Kasteng1, Martin Erlanson, Hans Hagberg, Eva Kimby, Thomas Relander, Jonas Lundkvist.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Rituximab has significantly improved the prognosis for patients with both indolent and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. An economic evaluation was carried out to assess the cost-effectiveness in Sweden of rituximab as maintenance therapy for patients with follicular lymphoma in remission after second line therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The incremental cost and effectiveness of rituximab maintenance therapy versus observation were evaluated in a health-state transition model. Primary effect measures were quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and life-years gained (LYG). Model state transitions were calculated based on progression-free and overall survival data from the EORTC20981 trial. The analysis was made from the perspective of the healthcare provider, including direct medical costs presented in euro, 2007 value. Effects and costs were discounted at a 3% annual rate. The stability of the base case results were tested in one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.
RESULTS: The evaluation assessed rituximab maintenance therapy to be associated with an incremental cost per QALY gained of euro 12,600 and an incremental cost per LYG of euro 11,200. The average discounted life expectancy for patients on rituximab maintenance was 1.0 year longer than for patients on observation (5.96 vs. 4.94 years). Rituximab maintenance was associated with an additional 0.9 QALY, and total costs per patient were euro 11,500 higher in the treatment arm, compared to observation. DISCUSSION: The results indicate that rituximab maintenance treatment after successful induction therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma in Sweden is cost-effective compared to observation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18607857     DOI: 10.1080/02841860802120028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  11 in total

Review 1.  Cost effectiveness of rituximab for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Philipp W P Auweiler; Dirk Müller; Stephanie Stock; Andreas Gerber
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Rituximab: a review of its use in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, low-grade or follicular lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Treatment Patterns and Health Care Costs in Commercially Insured Patients with Follicular Lymphoma.

Authors:  Nathan H Fowler; Guifang Chen; Stephen Lim; Stephanie Manson; Qiufei Ma; Frank Yunfeng Li
Journal:  J Health Econ Outcomes Res       Date:  2020-09-04

4.  Cost effectiveness of rituximab maintenance therapy in follicular lymphoma: long-term economic evaluation.

Authors:  Eric Deconinck; Houda Miadi-Fargier; Claude Le Pen; Pauline Brice
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Economic evaluation of plerixafor for stem cell mobilization.

Authors:  Steven M Kymes; Iskra Pusic; Dennis L Lambert; Martin Gregory; Kenneth R Carson; John F DiPersio
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  Rituximab in the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, focus on outcomes and comparative effectiveness.

Authors:  Firas Badin; John Hayslip
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2010-04-07

7.  Administration costs of intravenous biologic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Erkki J Soini; Miina Leussu; Taru Hallinen
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-10-17

8.  A Generic Model for Follicular Lymphoma: Predicting Cost, Life Expectancy, and Quality-Adjusted-Life-Year Using UK Population-Based Observational Data.

Authors:  Han-I Wang; Eve Roman; Simon Crouch; Eline Aas; Cathy Burton; Russell Patmore; Alexandra Smith
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 5.725

9.  A practical guide for using registry data to inform decisions about the cost effectiveness of new cancer drugs: lessons learned from the PHAROS registry.

Authors:  Hedwig M Blommestein; Margreet G Franken; Carin A Uyl-de Groot
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Cost effectiveness of first-line treatment with doxorubicin/ifosfamide compared to trabectedin monotherapy in the management of advanced soft tissue sarcoma in Italy, Spain, and sweden.

Authors:  Julian F Guest; Monica Panca; Erikas Sladkevicius; Nicholas Gough; Mark Linch
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2013-11-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.