| Literature DB >> 22434959 |
Biniam Guchi1, Mogessie Ashenafi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human food borne infections traditionally are acquired through the ingestion of foods of animal origin. Fresh fruits and vegetables are major vehicles for the transmission of the food-borne infections. In Ethiopia, there is a tradition of consuming raw vegetables, particularly lettuce and green pepper, without adequate treatment. The objective of this study was to investigate the microbial load of fresh lettuce and green pepper, used as salad vegetables, and to assess the prevalence and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella and Shigella spp. isolated from lettuce and green pepper.Entities:
Keywords: Green Pepper; Lettuce; drug resistance; microbial load
Year: 2010 PMID: 22434959 PMCID: PMC3275899 DOI: 10.4314/ejhs.v20i1.69431
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ethiop J Health Sci ISSN: 1029-1857
Microbial counts (log cfu/g) of lettuce and green pepper purchased from supermarkets in Addis Ababa
| Lettuce | Green pepper | |||||
| Bacterial groups | Mean | S.D. | %CV | Mean | S.D. | %CV |
| 4.51 | 0.84 | 18.70 | 4.05 | 0.69 | 17.27 | |
S.D. Standard deviation
C.V., Coefficient of variation
Dominant bacteria in lettuce and green pepper purchased form supermarkets in Addis Ababa.
| Sample | No of | Percent | |||||||
| Enterobacteriaceae | Other | ||||||||
| Lettuce | 229 | 8 | 16 | 13 | 7 | 30 | 17 | 1 | 8 |
| Green pepper | 378 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 30 | 32 | 4 | 18 |
| Total | 607 | 6 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 30 | 24.5 | 2.5 | 13 |
Frequency distribution of various microbial groups on lettuce (L) and green pepper (G)
| Microbial | Sample | Log (cfu/g) | ||||||||
| <2 | 2–2.99 | 3–3.99 | 4–4.99 | 5–5.99 | 6–6.99 | 7–7.99 | 8–8.99 | >9 | ||
| AMB | L | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 21 | 13 | 1 | 1 |
| G | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 1 | |
| Enterobacteriaceae | L | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 25 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| G | 0 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Coliforms | L | 0 | 2 | 4 | 15 | 15 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| G | 0 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Aerobic spores | L | 2 | 15 | 20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| G | 1 | 11 | 15 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Staphylococci | L | 0 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| G | 0 | 0 | 5 | 24 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Yeasts and | L | 0 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 19 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| G | 0 | 15 | 18 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
AMB, aerobic mesophilic bacteria
Frequency of resistance of Salmonella and Shigella isolated from lettuce and green pepper
| Isolates | No. of isolates | No. of resistant strain to | ||||||||||
| Pen | Str | Pol B | Tet | Amo | Cef | Gen | Cip | Amp | Kan | Ch1 | ||
| 8 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | |
| 24 | 22 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 19 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 1 | 2 | |
Pen, penicillin; Str, streptomycin; Pol B, polymyxin B; Tet, tetracycline; Amo, Amoxycillin; Cef, ceftriaxone; Gen, gentamycin, Cip, Ciproflaxin; Amp, ampicillin; Kan, kanamycin; Chl, chloramphenicol
Multiple drug resistance of Salmonella and Shigella isolated from lettuce and green pepper
| Number of antibiotic | Number of resistant | Drugs resisted | ||
| Three | 5 | 1 | Pen/Str/Amo | |
| 3 | Pen/Amo/Amp | |||
| 1 | Pen/Str/Cef | |||
| Four | 2 | 1 | Pen/Str/Amo/Cef | |
| 1 | Pen/Amo/Amp/Kan | |||
| Seven | 1 | 1 | Pen/Str/Tet/Amo/Cef/Amp/Chl | |
| Three | 6 | 5 | Pen/Amo/Amp | |
| 1 | Pen/Tet/Amo | |||
| Four | 4 | 1 | Pen/Tet/Amo/Amp | |
| 1 | Pen/Pol B/Amo/Chl | |||
| 1 | Pen/Amo/Cef/Amp | |||
| 1 | Pen/Cef/Amp/Chl | |||
| Five | 7 | 2 | Pen/Pol B/Tet/Amo/Amp | |
| 1 | Pen/Str/Amo/Cef/Amp | |||
| 1 | Pen/Pol B/Tet/Amo/Cef | |||
| 1 | Pen/Str/Tet/Amo/Amp | |||
| 1 | Pen/Amo/Cef/Amp/Chl | |||
| 1 | Pen/Str/Amo/Cef/Gen | |||
| Six | 4 | 1 | Pen/Str/Pol B/Amo/Cef/Amp | |
| 1 | Pen/Str/Amo/Cef/Amp/Chl | |||
| 1 | Pen/Str/Tet/Amo/Cef/Amp | |||
| 1 | Pen/Str/Pol B/Tet/Amo/Amp | |||
| Seven | 3 | 2 | Pen/Str/Tet/Amo/Cef/Amp/Kan | |
| 1 | Pen/Str/Pol B/Amo/Cef/Cip/Amp |